CVE Intelligence
Início / CVEs

Base de CVEs

Vulnerabilidades publicadas, com severidade, exploração conhecida e fontes oficiais.

Severidade
Limpar

1.434 resultado(s)

Exportar esta busca: RSS · CSV · STIX
CVE-2026-47229 Média · 5.4 CWE-352 12/08/2026
Admidio: CSRF in SSO client `enable` action toggles SAML/OIDC clients without token validation
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.10, `modules/sso/clients.php` validates an `adm_csrf_token` on every state-changing branch except `enable`. The `enable` case loads the SAML or OIDC client by UUID, calls `$client->enable($enabled)`, and persists the new state with no token check. Because the action is reachable via plain GET parameters, a third-party page can trick an authenticated administrator into disabling (or silently re-enabling) any configured SAML or OIDC client. Disabling an SSO client breaks every downstream relying-party application that authenticates through it. Version 5.0.10 contains a fix.
CVE-2026-47228 Média · 5.2 CWE-352 12/08/2026
Admidio's CSRF in registration `send_login` mode resets arbitrary user passwords
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. `modules/registration.php` mode `send_login` regenerates a random password for `user_uuid_assigned`, stores its bcrypt hash in `adm_users.usr_password`, and emails the cleartext to that user. Every other state-changing mode in the same file (`assign_member`, `assign_user`, `delete_user`, `create_user`) calls `SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token'])` first; the `send_login` branch does not. Prior to version 5.0.10, page visited by a registration-administrator can issue the request as a top-level navigation, the browser sends the admin's `SameSite=Lax` cookies, and the server resets the chosen user's password without any further interaction from the admin. Version 5.0.10 fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-73162 Média · 5.3 CWE-352 11/08/2026
cti-transmute CSRF Allows Unauthorized Follow and Notification State Changes
Affected versions of MISP cti-transmute expose several state-changing account operations as GET requests: * /account/follow * /account/delete_notification * /account/mark_notification_read * /account/mark_all_read These endpoints require authentication, but before the fix they could be invoked with simple GET requests. That makes them susceptible to cross-site request forgery because a third-party site can induce the victim’s browser to send authenticated GET requests automatically. The patch converts the actions to POST or DELETE and updates the frontend to include an X-CSRFToken header, providing explicit CSRF protection for those state-changing operations.
CVE-2026-66775 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 10/08/2026
Multiple vulnerabilities in SAP Business AI Platform (Approuter)
SAP Approuter does not enforce cross-site request forgery protection on the authentication flow by default. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link and trick a victim into following it. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to bind the victim's session to an attacker-controlled identity, resulting in a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality and availability.
CVE-2025-32736 Média · 4.9 CWE-352 10/08/2026
PingFederate Administrative Console CSRF weaknesses
Cross-Site Request Forgery weaknesses in the Administrative Console of PingFederate versions before version 13.1 may allow actors to perform unauthorized actions via specially-crafted links triggered by administrators with active sessions.
CVE-2026-72578 Alta · 8.8 CWE-352 10/08/2026
FreePBX Framework - Missing CSRF Protection in Admin Panel Ajax Dispatcher
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FreePBX Framework 17.0 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform administrative actions on behalf of an authenticated administrator.
CVE-2026-66642 Média · 5.4 CWE-352 10/08/2026
WordPress WP Umbrella plugin 2.24.2-2.26.2 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Umbrella allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Umbrella: from 2.24.2 through 2.26.2.
CVE-2026-16965 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 09/08/2026
Solace Extra < 1.6.1 - Subscriber+ Post Meta Update via solace_update_sitebuilder_status
The Solace Extra WordPress plugin before 1.6.1 does not perform capability or nonce checks in one of its AJAX actions, allowing any authenticated user such as a subscriber (and, via CSRF, any logged-in user) to update post meta on arbitrary posts and to deactivate the site's active templates.
CVE-2026-16262 Alta · 7.5 CWE-352 07/08/2026
Estatik < 4.3.3 - Login CSRF
The Estatik Real Estate Plugin WordPress plugin before 4.3.3 does not bind its OAuth social login flow to the initiating user session, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to log a victim into an attacker-controlled account (login CSRF), so that the victim's subsequent activity is stored under and readable by the attacker.
CVE-2026-66686 Média · 6.5 CWE-352 06/08/2026
WordPress Plugins Garbage Collector (Database Cleanup) plugin <= 0.14 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Plugins Garbage Collector (Database Cleanup) <= 0.14 versions.
CVE-2026-66681 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 06/08/2026
WordPress theme My Login plugin <= 7.1.14 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Theme My Login <= 7.1.14 versions.
CVE-2026-28172 Alta · 7.1 CWE-352 06/08/2026
WordPress Tracking Code Manager plugin <= 2.6.0 - CSRF to Stored XSS vulnerability
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Tracking Code Manager <= 2.6.0 versions.
CVE-2026-70556 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 06/08/2026
Hubzilla version prior to 11.4 CSRF via OAuth2 /authorize Endpoint App Registration
Hubzilla versions prior to 11.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the OAuth2 /authorize endpoint handled by Zotlabs\Module\Authorize::post() that allows unauthenticated attackers to register arbitrary OAuth2 applications under an authenticated user's account by submitting a cross-origin POST request without CSRF token or Origin/Referer validation. Attackers can craft a malicious HTML form that autosubmits attacker-chosen OAuth2 parameters including client_id, client_secret, redirect_uri, and scope to silently register a persistent OAuth2 application, enabling interception of future OAuth2 authorization codes when the victim later authenticates against the attacker-controlled client.
CVE-2025-13394 Média · 5.4 CWE-352 06/08/2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery via Ajax Processor Endpoints in Multiple WSO2 Products Enables Unauthorized Actions
The Ajax processor within the Carbon console fails to adequately protect state-changing operations from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. Specifically, it utilizes the HTTP GET method for these operations, and while the SameSite=Lax cookie attribute is employed for mitigation, this mechanism is bypassed as it permits cookies to be sent with cross-origin top-level navigation requests, including GET requests. This allows an attacker to trick an authenticated user's browser into unknowingly executing unintended actions. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to perform unauthorized state-altering requests on behalf of authenticated users. This could lead to consequences such as data modification, account changes, or other actions that could result in data compromise or loss of user control over their account. However, this attack is only feasible if the Carbon console and related services are exposed to the public internet, which is not recommended according to WSO2's security guidelines.
CVE-2026-14313 Média · 5.3 CWE-352 06/08/2026
PeproDev WooCommerce Receipt Uploader <= 2.8.0 - Unauthenticated Order Receipt Tampering via IDOR
PeproDev WooCommerce Receipt Uploader (PeproDev WooCommerce Receipt Uploader WordPress plugin through 2.8.0 slug: pepro-bacs-receipt-upload-for-woocommerce), all versions up to and including 2.8.0 (latest on wordpress.org; no fixed version available at the time of writing), is vulnerable to unauthenticated missing-authorization / IDOR write. Requires WooCommerce.
CVE-2026-14204 Média · 6.5 CWE-352 06/08/2026
Google Authenticator < 0.56 - 2FA Secret Overwrite via CSRF
The Google Authenticator WordPress plugin before 0.56 does not verify a CSRF nonce when saving its two-factor setup, allowing attackers to trick a logged-in user into overwriting their own 2FA secret with an attacker-controlled value, which enables two-factor authentication and locks the victim out of their account.
CVE-2026-66885 Média · 6.5 CWE-352 05/08/2026
Livebook Teams identity callback lacks state binding, allowing login CSRF
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in livebook-dev livebook allows an attacker to authenticate a victim's browser session under the attacker's own Livebook Teams identity. When Livebook is configured to use Livebook Teams for identity, Livebook.ZTA.LivebookTeams.handle_request/4 in lib/livebook/zta/livebook_teams.ex handles the OAuth-style callback carrying a teams_identity marker and a code parameter. The clause exchanges that code for an access token and writes the token into the browser session without verifying any value that ties the callback to the browser session that started the login. No state or nonce is generated when the flow is initiated: Livebook.Teams.Requests.create_auth_request/1 in lib/livebook/teams/requests.ex sends an empty request body, so no per-attempt value is ever registered, and the callback clause has nothing to compare against. An attacker who holds membership in the same Livebook Teams organisation as the target instance can therefore begin the login flow themselves, retain the resulting authorization code without redeeming it, and induce a victim to open a crafted URL carrying that code. The victim's browser completes the exchange and the resulting session is bound to the attacker's identity rather than the victim's. The victim is not required to hold any particular privilege, and no credential belonging to the victim is involved. The vulnerability does not allow the attacker to authenticate as the victim. The consequence is that a user believes they are working in their own authenticated session while they are in fact operating as another identity. Work performed in that session is attributed to the attacker's account, and secrets, uploaded data, or notebook results the victim produces are exposed to the attacker rather than kept in the victim's own account. The authorization code must be redeemed within a short window after the login flow begins, which constrains the timing of the attack but not its feasibility. This issue affects livebook: from 0.15.0 before 0.18.7 and from 0.19.0 before 0.19.9.
CVE-2026-70434 Média · 4.2 CWE-352 05/08/2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) em Jenkins Project Jenkins SCM-Manager Plugin
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins SCM-Manager Plugin 1.11.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.
CVE-2026-70432 Alta · 8.8 CWE-352 05/08/2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) em Jenkins Project Jenkins Multijob Plugin
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Multijob Plugin 669.v9d96a_d9c71b_0 and earlier allows attackers to execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM.
CVE-2026-7326 Alta · 8.8 CWE-352 05/08/2026
Cross-site request forgery in Progress MarkLogic Server Admin UI
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the Admin UI of Progress MarkLogic Server before 11.3.6 and 12.0.3 allows a remote attacker who lures an authenticated administrator to a malicious web page to perform administrative actions on the administrator's behalf. This can result in unauthorized changes to security configuration.
CVE-2026-71273 Média · 6.5 CWE-352 05/08/2026
OpenBK7231T CSRF in /cfg_wifi_set Leading to Implicit Web Password Disable and WiFi Hijack
OpenBK7231T's /cfg_wifi_set endpoint (src/httpserver/http_fns.c) accepts configuration changes via a plain GET request with no CSRF token. If the parameter is absent from the request, an else-branch silently clears the device's web admin password to an empty string.
CVE-2026-7444 Alta · 8.1 CWE-352 05/08/2026
Search Analytics for WP <= 1.4.16 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Search Analytics for WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.16. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the `process_bulk_action()` function of `MWTSA_Stats_Table`. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary search-term records, including all associated search-history rows, via a forged request granted they can trick a user with access to the plugin's "Search Analytics" dashboard page (Administrator by default) into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-70376 Crítica · 9.6 CWE-352 05/08/2026
Pluck CMS - CSRF via Spoofable Missing-Referer Bypass Leads to Stored XSS and RCE
Pluck CMS's admin panel relies solely on a Referer-header comparison (requestedByTheSameDomain in data/inc/functions.admin.php, gating every admin.php action) for CSRF protection, with no per-request anti-CSRF token anywhere in the admin area.
CVE-2026-16613 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 05/08/2026
GDPR Cookie Compliance < 5.1.0 - Cookie Deletion and Forced Logout via CSRF
The GDPR Cookie Compliance WordPress plugin before 5.1.0 expires the visitor's cookies from an action that is reachable without authentication and performs no request-origin check, allowing an attacker to log any user out and delete the site's cookies by luring them to a crafted link.
CVE-2026-18819 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 04/08/2026
RackTables cross-site request forgery
A security vulnerability has been detected in RackTables up to 0.22.0/e5fff9f8aab339798ed47e8c6d7d977ed97a82bd. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project maintainer confirms: "[I]t seems plausible, in that RackTables does not at this time have any CSRF prevention. You may assign a CVE ID to this, but there is no guarantee it will be handled in urgent, or even timely, manner, or at all."