CVE Intelligence
Início / CVEs

Base de CVEs

Vulnerabilidades publicadas, com severidade, exploração conhecida e fontes oficiais.

Severidade
Limpar

1.436 resultado(s)

Exportar esta busca: RSS · CSV · STIX
CVE-2026-13156 Média · 5.4 CWE-352 20/07/2026
MailerSend - Official SMTP Integration < 1.0.8 - Settings Deletion and Plugin Deactivation via CSRF
The MailerSend WordPress plugin before 1.0.8 does not perform a nonce check on its configuration-delete action (it verifies the manage_options capability but ignores the nonce), so an attacker can trick a logged-in administrator into visiting a crafted page that wipes the MailerSend WordPress plugin before 1.0.8's SMTP configuration and deactivates the MailerSend WordPress plugin before 1.0.8, breaking the site's email delivery.
CVE-2026-16216 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 19/07/2026
geex-arts django-jet OAuth cross-site request forgery
A weakness has been identified in geex-arts django-jet up to 1.0.8. Affected is an unknown function of the component OAuth Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
CVE-2026-16081 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 18/07/2026
Sipeed PicoClaw auth.go cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability was determined in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. The affected element is an unknown function of the file web/backend/api/auth.go. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This patch is called 4b0229351678f479429b8d8b19207757266f246b. Applying a patch is advised to resolve this issue.
CVE-2026-9734 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 18/07/2026
W3SC Elementor to Zoho CRM <= 2.2.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The W3SC Elementor to Zoho CRM plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the storeInfo function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's Zoho CRM integration settings, replacing the configured data center, client ID, client secret, and user email credentials with attacker-controlled values via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-49215 Média · 5.4 CWE-352 17/07/2026
Symfony UX: CSRF Protection Bypass in symfony/ux-live-component — Accept Header is CORS-Safelisted
Symfony UX is a JavaScript ecosystem for Symfony. From 2.22.0 until 2.36.0 and 3.1.0, Symfony\UX\LiveComponent\EventListener\LiveComponentSubscriber::isLiveComponentRequest() gates #[LiveAction] invocations on Accept: application/vnd.live-component+html, but the Accept header is CORS-safelisted and cross-origin fetch() can set it without preflight, allowing forged cross-origin #[LiveAction] requests against a victim session when applications use SameSite=None, credentials: 'include', a permissive cookie policy, or a same-origin pivot. This issue is fixed in versions 2.36.0 and 3.1.0.
CVE-2026-60025 Alta · 8.8 CWE-352 17/07/2026
Joomla Extension - joomdonation.com - User enumeration in Events Booking < 5.8.0
Joomla Extension - joomdonation.com - User enumeration in Events Booking < 5.8.0 - The Joomla extension Events Booking prior version 5.8.0 had an frontend file upload endpoint that lacked CSRF protection.
CVE-2026-62236 Média · 5.4 CWE-352 16/07/2026
grav-plugin-login < 3.8.11 CSRF via regenerate2FASecret
grav-plugin-login before 3.8.11 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the login.regenerate2FASecret frontend task, which regenerates and persists a new TOTP secret for the authenticated session user without any anti-CSRF nonce or Origin/Referer check. Because Grav core dispatches the task from the GET 'task:' URI parameter and the default session cookie is SameSite=Lax, an attacker can lure a logged-in victim to an off-site page that performs a top-level GET navigation, rotating the victim's TOTP secret so their enrolled authenticator no longer matches the server, effectively forcing 2FA re-enrollment. Sites configured with session.samesite: Strict are not affected.
CVE-2026-35143 Média · 6.5 CWE-352 16/07/2026
HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing SameSite Attribute vulnerability.
HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing SameSite Attribute vulnerability. The application fails to set the "SameSite" attribute on session cookies generated during authentication, which could allow a remote attacker to execute Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks if additional mitigations, such as Anti-CSRF tokens, are not implemented.
CVE-2026-15005 Alta · 8.8 CWE-352 16/07/2026
Loco Translate <= 2.8.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Remote Code Execution via 'template' Parameter
The Loco Translate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the execTemplate function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code on the server by supplying a php://filter stream wrapper URI as the 'template' parameter, which bypasses path validation and is passed directly to the include sink in execTemplate() via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-11866 Média · 5.4 CWE-352 16/07/2026
LatePoint < 5.6.3 - Multiple Privileged Actions via CSRF
The Appointment Booking Plugin WordPress plugin before 5.6.3 does not validate a CSRF nonce on several state-changing actions handled by its central request dispatcher, allowing attackers to perform privileged actions, such as overwriting the booking-form configuration or disconnecting the connected payment gateway, via Cross-Site Request Forgery against a logged-in administrator.
CVE-2026-12409 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 16/07/2026
Landing Page Builder <= 1.5.3.6 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to ulpb_admin_data AJAX Action
The Landing Page Builder – Coming Soon page, Maintenance Mode, Lead Page, WordPress Landing Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.3.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ulpb_admin_ajax function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create, update, retitle, or change the post status, slug, and type of arbitrary posts and write ULPB_DATA post meta via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This attack requires the victim to hold an editor-level or administrator session, as the wp_ajax_ulpb_admin_data action enforces a capability check that the forged request must satisfy by inheriting the logged-in user's session cookies.
CVE-2026-26718 Crítica · 9.1 CWE-352 15/07/2026
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the xxl-job-admin web…
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the xxl-job-admin web application v.3.0.0 that allows an attacker to perform unauthorized modifications to Glue IDE shell scripts. The affected endpoint lacks proper CSRF token validation and accepts arbitrary HTTP methods via a permissive request mapping
CVE-2026-20296 Alta · 8.3 CWE-352 15/07/2026
SPL Command Safeguards Bypass through Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Deployment Server in Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.1, 10.2.5, 10.0.8, and 9.4.13, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.5.2605.0, 10.4.2604.7, 10.3.2512.16, 10.2.2510.18, and 10.1.2507.24, an attacker could trick a user that holds a role with the `list_deployment_server` capability into running arbitrary Search Processing Language (SPL) searches on their behalf as `splunk-system-user`, allowing for access to stored credentials and indexed data.<br><br>The vulnerability is possible because Deployment Server endpoints in Splunk Web do not validate Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) tokens on GET requests, and caller-supplied input is not correctly neutralized before it is placed into an SPL search.
CVE-2026-47158 Alta · 8.3 CWE-352 15/07/2026
Vaultwarden: CSRF in SSO Authorization Flow
Vaultwarden is a Bitwarden-compatible server written in Rust. Prior to 1.36.0, Vaultwarden's SSO authorization flow did not bind the OAuth state parameter accepted by /connect/authorize to the initiating browser session, allowed attacker-controlled PKCE parameters, and left SsoAuth records intact after failed token exchange, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to induce IdP authentication and redeem tokens for a fully authenticated session. This issue is fixed in version 1.36.0.
CVE-2026-52100 Alta · 7.5 CWE-352 14/07/2026
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in andreimarcu linux-server v.1.0 through…
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in andreimarcu linux-server v.1.0 through v.2.3.8 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the uploadPutHandler function
CVE-2026-58476 Alta · 8.1 CWE-352 14/07/2026
Sustainable Irrigation Platform 5.2.16 CSRF via Administrative GET Requests
Sustainable Irrigation Platform (SIP) through version 5.2.16 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to perform state-changing administrative actions by luring a logged-in administrator into visiting a malicious page that issues HTTP GET requests without CSRF token validation or origin verification. Attackers can trigger actions such as disabling the passphrase, rebooting the device, deleting programs, or installing plugins, with the default configuration exposing these endpoints to unauthenticated users due to no required passphrase and a default credential of 'opendoor'.
CVE-2026-58489 Média · 6.8 CWE-352 13/07/2026
HedgeDoc: CSRF in GitHub Gist export callback
HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time collaborative markdown notes application. Prior to 1.11.0, the GitHub Gist export flow created an OAuth2  state  value but only checked that it was present rather than validating it against the value expected for the user's session. Because the state was not properly validated, an attacker could forge a callback URL containing their own valid GitHub OAuth code. When processing the callback, HedgeDoc used the victim's logged-in session to select which note to export, but the attacker's authorization code to determine which GitHub account received it. As a result, a logged-in victim who clicked a crafted link could export their own private, protected, or limited note directly into a Gist controlled by the attacker. This issue has been fixed in version 1.11.0.
CVE-2026-61502 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 13/07/2026
Rejetto HFS < 3.2.1 Cross-Site Request Forgery via GET Requests
Rejetto HFS 3.0.0 through 3.2.0 accepts state-changing API requests via the GET method and exempts GET requests from its anti-CSRF header check. A remote attacker can perform administrative actions including account creation and configuration changes leading to code execution - by causing a logged-in administrator's browser to navigate to a crafted URL, or without any credentials against default installations when the attack originates from the server's own machine.
CVE-2026-61956 Alta · 7.1 CWE-352 13/07/2026
WordPress ووسلام – همگام سازی ووکامرس و باسلام plugin <= 1.9.1 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in hamsalam ووسلام &#8211; همگام سازی ووکامرس و باسلام sync-basalam allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects ووسلام &#8211; همگام سازی ووکامرس و باسلام: from n/a through <= 1.9.1.
CVE-2026-57786 Alta · 8.8 CWE-352 13/07/2026
WordPress WorkScout-Core plugin <= 1.7.08 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) to Broken Authentication vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in purethemes WorkScout-Core workscout-core allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects WorkScout-Core: from n/a through <= 1.7.08.
CVE-2026-15080 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 10/07/2026
Ray Enterprise Translation - Moderately critical - Cross site request forgery - SA-CONTRIB-2026-071
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Ray Enterprise Translation allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Ray Enterprise Translation versions: from 0.0.0 to 4.0.4, from 4.1.0 to 4.1.4, from 11.0.0 to 11.0.4.
CVE-2026-13243 Média · 4.8 CWE-352 10/07/2026
Salesforce Suite - Moderately critical - Cross-site request forgery - SA-CONTRIB-2026-063
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Salesforce Suite allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Salesforce Suite versions: from 0.0.0 to 5.1.3.
CVE-2026-38057 Alta · 8.1 CWE-352 10/07/2026
ST Engineering iDirect iQ-Series Terminals Cross-Site request forgery
The iDirect iQ200 does not validate CSRF tokens on state-changing API endpoints after authentication. The /api/reboot endpoint accepts POST requests authenticated solely by a session cookie that lacks the SameSite attribute. A remote attacker can host a malicious web page that, when visited by an authenticated administrator, automatically submits a cross-site POST request causing an immediate device reboot and satellite link loss. Repeated attacks can sustain a denial-of-service condition.
CVE-2026-6440 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 10/07/2026
GoodMeet <= 1.1.8 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Google Meet Credential Reset via 'goodmeet_reset_google_meet_credential'
The GoodMeet – Google Meet Integration for Webinar, Meeting & Video Conference plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.1.8. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the reset_credential() function, which handles the wp_ajax_goodmeet_reset_google_meet_credential AJAX action. While the function does verify the user's capability (manage_options), it does not validate a nonce, making it susceptible to CSRF attacks. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a site administrator into clicking a malicious link that will reset (delete) the plugin's stored Google Meet API credentials (goodmeet_google_credentials) and OAuth tokens (goodmeet_google_token), effectively disabling the Google Meet integration on the site.
CVE-2026-15070 Alta · 8.8 CWE-352 10/07/2026
Salon Booking System <= 10.30.32 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Remote Code Execution via 'value' Parameter
The Salon Booking System – Free Version plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 10.30.32. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the setCustomText function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary PHP code into the web-accessible translate-constants.php file within the plugin directory, enabling remote code execution on the server via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. sanitize_text_field() is applied to the POST 'value' parameter but does not neutralize the characters — single quotes, parentheses, semicolons, $, and [] — required to break out of the PHP string literal into which the value is interpolated before being written to disk via file_put_contents().