Início / CVEs
Base de CVEs
Vulnerabilidades publicadas, com severidade, exploração conhecida e fontes oficiais.
CVE-2026-6405
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 20/05/2026
Anomify AI <= 0.3.6 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Anomify AI – Anomaly Detection and Alerting plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in versions up to and including 0.3.6. This is due to missing nonce verification on the settings page handler and insufficient output escaping in the admin_options.php template. The settings form includes no wp_nonce_field() and the handler performs no check_admin_referer() check, meaning any cross-origin POST can modify plugin settings. The API key field is sanitized only with sanitize_text_field(), which strips HTML tags but does not encode double-quote characters; the value is then rendered into an HTML attribute via bare echo without esc_attr(), allowing a double-quote attribute-escape payload to survive both sanitization and storage. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts by tricking a logged-in administrator into visiting a malicious page that submits a forged request, storing the payload in the database and causing it to execute in the administrator's browser whenever the plugin settings page is visited.
CVE-2026-8424
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 19/05/2026
Remove Yellow BGBOX <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Remove Yellow BGBOX plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'rybb_api_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the plugin's stored settings by overwriting its configuration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-8423
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 19/05/2026
JaviBola Custom Theme Test <= 2.0.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
The JaviBola Custom Theme Test plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the options page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the site's active theme by modifying the jbct_theme option via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-8420
Média · 6.1
CWE-352 19/05/2026
BLOGCHAT Chat System <= 1.3.6.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Settings Update
The BLOGCHAT Chat System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.6.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-8419
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 19/05/2026
Amazon Scraper <= 1.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Settings Update
The Amazon Scraper plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-8418
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 19/05/2026
Games Catalog <= 1.2.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary Game/Post Deletion
The Games Catalog plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the gc_crud() function which handles the delete action (action=delete) via a GET request without any wp_verify_nonce() / check_admin_referer() call. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary game catalog entries (including the associated WordPress post created for the game) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-6452
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 19/05/2026
Bigfishgames Syndicate <= 1.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Reset and Update
The Bigfishgames Syndicate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the bigfishgames_syndicate_submenu() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset plugin settings and update them via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-6401
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 19/05/2026
Bottom Bar <= 0.1.7 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The Bottom Bar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 0.1.7. This is due to missing nonce verification on the plugin's settings update forms handled in bottom-bar-admin.php. None of the three settings forms (main settings, sharing services, restore defaults) include a wp_nonce_field(), and the server-side processing code never calls check_admin_referer() or any equivalent nonce validation before processing POST data and calling update_option(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into submitting a crafted request that updates plugin configuration options, such as changing the language, maximum post counts, or enabled sharing services.
CVE-2026-6400
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 19/05/2026
Child Height Predictor by Ostheimer <= 1.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update via Plugin Settings Form
The Child Height Predictor by Ostheimer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.3. This is due to missing nonce verification in the options() function, which handles plugin settings updates. The form template does not include a wp_nonce_field() call, and the handler never calls check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a site administrator into clicking a link or visiting a malicious page that submits a forged POST request, causing unauthorized changes to the plugin settings such as unit preferences to be persisted to the database via update_option().
CVE-2026-6395
Média · 6.1
CWE-352 19/05/2026
Word 2 Cash <= 0.9.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgeryto Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Settings Page
The Word 2 Cash plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to and including 0.9.2. This is due to the complete absence of nonce verification on the settings save handler in the w2c_admin() function, combined with missing input sanitization before storage and missing output escaping when rendering the stored value. The w2c-definitions POST parameter is saved raw via update_option() and later echoed without escaping inside a <textarea> element. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to forge a request on behalf of a logged-in administrator, storing arbitrary JavaScript payloads that execute in the WordPress admin panel whenever the settings page is visited.
CVE-2026-6391
Média · 6.1
CWE-352 19/05/2026
Sentence To SEO (keywords, description and tags) <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Settings Page Parameters
The Sentence To SEO (keywords, description and tags) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the create_admin_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts and update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-8604
Alta · 8.8
CWE-352 19/05/2026
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) in ScadaBR
In ScadaBR version 1.2.0, a CSRF vulnerability could allow an attacker to trigger any authenticated action through a victim's session by luring any logged-in user to a malicious webpage.
CVE-2018-25337
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 17/05/2026
Joomla JoomOCShop 1.0 Cross-Site Request Forgery
Joomla JoomOCShop 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users. Attackers can craft malicious HTML forms targeting account endpoints like /joomoc2/?route=account/edit and to modify user information or reset passwords without user consent.
CVE-2018-25336
Média · 5.3
CWE-352 17/05/2026
jCart for OpenCart 2.3.0.2 Cross-Site Request Forgery
jCart for OpenCart 2.3.0.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify user account information without authentication. Attackers can craft malicious HTML forms targeting endpoints , and to change user credentials, passwords, and affiliate account details when victims visit the attacker-controlled page.
CVE-2018-25334
Média · 5.4
CWE-352 17/05/2026
Zechat 1.5 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via hashtag parameter
Zechat 1.5 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that allows an attacker to change a user's information by bypassing anti-CSRF protections. The application uses a CSRF token, but an attacker can use the hashtag parameter to inject an encoded payload and bypass the CSRF protection, allowing for unauthorized changes to user data. This can be exploited by tricking a user into submitting a crafted form or by using a script to obtain and set the CSRF token.
CVE-2018-25327
Média · 5.3
CWE-352 17/05/2026
Joomla! Component Js Jobs 1.2.0 Cross-Site Request Forgery
Joomla! Component Js Jobs 1.2.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform state-changing actions without token validation. Attackers can craft malicious HTML forms targeting administrative endpoints like job.jobenforcedelete to delete job entries or modify component settings when administrators visit attacker-controlled pages.
CVE-2018-25321
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 17/05/2026
TP-Link TL-WR720N CSRF via Administrative Interfaces (firmware V1_130719)
TP-Link TL-WR720N wireless router contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized administrative actions by crafting malicious web requests. Attackers can modify port forwarding rules via VirtualServerRpm.htm or change WiFi security settings via WlanSecurityRpm.htm by tricking authenticated users into visiting attacker-controlled pages.
CVE-2021-47976
Alta · 8.8
CWE-352 16/05/2026
TextPattern CMS 4.9.0-dev Authenticated Remote Code Execution via Plugin Upload
TextPattern CMS 4.9.0-dev contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to upload arbitrary PHP files by exploiting the plugin upload functionality. Attackers can authenticate, retrieve a CSRF token from the plugin event page, and upload malicious PHP files to the textpattern/tmp/ directory for code execution.
CVE-2020-37241
Média · 5.3
CWE-352 16/05/2026
bloofoxCMS 0.5.2.1 Cross-Site Request Forgery via user add
bloofoxCMS 0.5.2.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions by tricking logged-in users into visiting malicious pages. Attackers can craft hidden forms targeting the admin user creation endpoint to add new administrative accounts with arbitrary credentials without requiring explicit user consent.
CVE-2026-45773
Média · 6.5
CWE-352 15/05/2026
Turborepo: Login callback CSRF/session fixation
Turborepo is a high-performance build system for JavaScript and TypeScript codebases. Prior to 2.9.14, Turborepo's self-hosted login and SSO browser flows did not validate a CSRF state value on the localhost callback. While the CLI was waiting for authentication, a malicious web page could send a request to the local callback server with an attacker-controlled token. If accepted before the legitimate callback, the CLI could complete login with the wrong credentials. This affects users authenticating the turbo CLI against self-hosted remote cache/auth endpoints. Vercel-hosted login flows using device authorization are not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.14.
CVE-2026-8425
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 15/05/2026
Notify Odoo <= 1.0.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The Notify Odoo plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the _updateSettings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the Notify Odoo URL to an attacker-controlled URL and modify notification, tracking image, and allowed IP address settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-28761
Alta · 8.1
CWE-352 15/05/2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) em Fujitsu Japan Limited Musetheque V4 Information Disclosure for IPKNOWLEDGE
Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Musetheque V4 Information Disclosure for IPKNOWLEDGE V4L1 rev2203.0 and earlier. If a user views a malicious page while logged-in to the affected product, unexpected operations may be done.
CVE-2026-5365
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 14/05/2026
LatePoint <= 5.3.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via 'customer_cabinet__request_cancellation' AJAX Route
The LatePoint plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 5.3.2. This is due to missing nonce verification on the request_cancellation() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to cancel a logged-in customer's bookings via a forged request, granted they can trick the customer into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-4527
Média · 6.5
CWE-352 14/05/2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 11.10 before 18.9.7, 18.10 before 18.10.6, and 18.11 before 18.11.3 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to create unauthorized Jira subscriptions for a targeted user's namespace via a specially crafted link due to missing CSRF protection.
CVE-2025-27851
Crítica · 9.3
CWE-352 13/05/2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) em Garmin Empirbus Wireless Display Unit Firmware
The locally served web site on the Garmin WDU (v1 1.4.6 and v2 5.0) allows a cross-site origin WebSocket hijacking attack. Among other uses, the WDU utilizes WebSockets to control settings, including administrative settings. This allows a network attacker to take full control of a WDU. To initiate an exploit of this vulnerability, the victim must (1) be utilizing a web browser on a multihomed host that has local interfaces on the Garmin Marine Network as well as another network, and (2) access a malicious third party website created by the attacker.