CVE Intelligence
Início / CVEs

Base de CVEs

Vulnerabilidades publicadas, com severidade, exploração conhecida e fontes oficiais.

Severidade
Limpar

1.449 resultado(s)

Exportar esta busca: RSS · CSV · STIX
CVE-2026-44364 Crítica · 9.3 CWE-352 13/05/2026
Website do MISP Modules - Ausência de proteção CSRF no blueprint home
Os módulos do MISP são módulos autônomos que podem ser usados para estender o MISP para novos serviços. Nas versões 3.0.7 e anteriores, uma vulnerabilidade de Cross-Site Request Forgery no website do MISP Modules permitia que um atacante fizesse um usuário autenticado enviar requisições não intencionais ao endpoint home. A vulnerabilidade decorria de o blueprint home estar isento da proteção CSRF. Isso poderia permitir a modificação de dados de consulta de sessão no contexto do usuário autenticado. O problema foi corrigido ao habilitar a proteção CSRF para o blueprint afetado e fortalecer o parsing de consultas.
CVE-2026-41255 Média · 6.1 CWE-352 13/05/2026
CKAN: CSRF exemption primed by anonymous requests
CKAN is an open-source DMS (data management system) for powering data hubs and data portals. Prior to 2.10.10 and 2.11.5, Access to the views via tokens or unauthenticated requests marked the endpoint as not requiring CSRF protection. The marking was a member variable in flask-wtf.csrf.CSRFProtect(), which was stored as a module level variable in the flask_app middleware. This API was never intended for request level changes, it is primarily a decorator for static configuration. An unauthenticated request could hit a protected endpoint, exempting it from CSRF protection for the life of the particular server process. (e.g. one worker of uwsgi). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.10.10 and 2.11.5.
CVE-2026-40703 Média · 5.4 CWE-352 13/05/2026
BIG-IP Configuration utility CSRF vulnerability
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the dashboard of the BIG-IP Configuration utility.  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
CVE-2020-37217 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 13/05/2026
Easy2Pilot 7 Cross-Site Request Forgery via admin.php
Easy2Pilot 7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to add unauthorized user accounts by tricking authenticated administrators into visiting malicious pages. Attackers can craft HTML forms targeting the admin.php?action=add_user endpoint with POST requests containing username and password parameters to create new administrative accounts without explicit user consent.
CVE-2026-44548 Alta · 8.1 CWE-352 12/05/2026
ChurchCRM: CSRF via legacy GET-delete pages (FundRaiserDelete.php, PropertyTypeDelete.php, NoteDelete.php)
ChurchCRM is an open-source church management system. Prior to 7.3.2, top-level cross-site GET navigation from an attacker-controlled page to FundRaiserDelete.php, PropertyTypeDelete.php, or NoteDelete.php causes a logged-in ChurchCRM user with the relevant role to silently delete records, including cascaded property and record-to-property assignments. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.3.2.
CVE-2026-44347 Média · 6.5 CWE-352 12/05/2026
Warpgate: SSO CSRF -- State Token Not Validated on Return
Warpgate is an open source SSH, HTTPS and MySQL bastion host for Linux. Prior to 0.23.3, the SSO flow does not validate the state parameter, which makes it possible for an attacker to trick a user into logging into the attacker's account, possibly convincing them to perform sensitive actions on the attacker's account (such as writing sensitive data to the attacker's SSH target, or logging into an HTTP target that the attacker set up). This vulnerability is fixed in 0.23.3.
CVE-2026-30807 Alta · 8.8 CWE-352 12/05/2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery on Extension Pages
Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability allows an attacker to perform unauthorized actions via crafted web page. This issue affects Pandora FMS: from 777 through 800
CVE-2026-7616 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 12/05/2026
Zawgyi Embed <= 2.1.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via 'zawgyi_forceCSS' Parameter
The Zawgyi Embed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the zawgyi_adminpage function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's zawgyi_forceCSS setting by submitting a forged POST request to options-general.php?page=zawgyi_embed via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-7562 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 12/05/2026
WP-Redirection <= 1.0.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The WP-Redirection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.0.3. This is due to the absence of a nonce field in the admin settings form and the lack of any nonce verification (via check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce()) in the displayWPRedirectionManagementPage() function before processing POST requests that add, edit, or delete URL redirection rules. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into clicking a crafted link, causing the attacker to create, modify, or delete redirection records in the plugin's database table without the administrator's consent.
CVE-2026-7561 Média · 6.1 CWE-352 12/05/2026
Tm – WordPress Redirection <= 1.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting
The Tm – WordPress Redirection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-6932 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 12/05/2026
Woo Commerce Minimum Weight <= 3.0.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via Settings Update Form
The Woo Commerce Minimum Weight plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 3.0.1. This is due to missing nonce verification on the settings update handler in edit-weight.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the minimum order weight setting by tricking a site administrator into clicking a link or visiting an attacker-controlled page containing a forged POST request.
CVE-2026-6710 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 12/05/2026
Skysa Text Ticker App <= 1.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Modification via 'Save Settings' Form
The Skysa Text Ticker App plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the SkysaApps_Admin_AppPage function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a site administrator into making a forged request to modify the plugin's settings, including the scrolling message text and URL, via a forged cross-site request via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-45430 Alta · 7.1 CWE-352 12/05/2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) em Backdrop CMS contributed projects Backdrop-contrib/salesforce
The Salesforce module before 1.x-1.0.1 for Backdrop CMS does not properly use a random state parameter to protect the authorization flow against CSRF attacks.
CVE-2026-0502 Média · 5.4 CWE-352 12/05/2026
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform
Due to insufficient CSRF protection in SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform ,an authenticated user could be tricked by an attacker to send unintended requests to the web server. This has low impact on integrity and availability of the application. There is no impact on confidentiality of the data.
CVE-2026-44695 Média · 6.5 CWE-352 11/05/2026
Outline: Slack OAuth state can link a victim Outline account to an attacker Slack identity
Outline is a service that allows for collaborative documentation. Prior to 1.7.1, the Slack integration callback for GET /auth/slack.post accepts an unsigned, session-independent OAuth state value. A third party who can obtain a Slack OAuth code for the same Outline Slack client can make a logged-in Outline user complete the callback and link that user's Outline account to the attacker's Slack team_id and user_id. The linked Slack identity can then use the Slack /outline search command as the victim Outline user. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.7.1.
CVE-2026-43877 Média · 5.4 CWE-352 11/05/2026
WWBN AVideo: CSRF in userSavePhoto.php Allows Cross-Origin Overwrite of Any Logged-in User's Profile Photo with Arbitrary Bytes
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 29.0, objects/userSavePhoto.php is a legacy profile-photo endpoint that accepts a base64 POST parameter and writes the decoded bytes to videos/userPhoto/photo<users_id>.png. Its only access control is User::isLogged(). It does not end in .json.php, so it is excluded from the project's global autoCSRFGuard (which is suffix-scoped in objects/include_config.php). There is no CSRF token, no Origin/Referer check, and no MIME validation of the decoded bytes. Because AVideo's default cookie policy is SameSite=None; Secure on HTTPS (objects/functionsPHP.php:227), an attacker who lures a logged-in user to a malicious page can overwrite that user's profile photo with arbitrary bytes and also triggers a site-wide clearCache(true) on every forged request. Commit 9c38468041505e637101c5943c5370c68f48e3ac contains an updated fix.
CVE-2026-38566 Alta · 8.1 CWE-352 11/05/2026
HireFlow v1.2 does not implement CSRF token validation on any state-changing POST…
HireFlow v1.2 does not implement CSRF token validation on any state-changing POST endpoint. All forms (password change at /profile, candidate deletion at /candidates/delete/<id>, feedback submission at /feedback/add/<id>, interview scheduling at /interviews/add) are vulnerable to CSRF. An attacker who can trick an authenticated user into visiting a malicious page can silently change the victim's password, delete records, or inject arbitrary data on their behalf. The SESSION_COOKIE_SAMESITE attribute is also not configured, removing the browser-level CSRF defense.
CVE-2022-50955 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 10/05/2026
WordPress Plugin Curtain 1.0.2 Cross-site Request Forgery
WordPress Plugin Curtain 1.0.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to activate or deactivate site maintenance mode by crafting malicious requests. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into submitting forged requests to the options-general.php page with curtain parameters to toggle maintenance mode without valid nonce validation.
CVE-2021-47953 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 10/05/2026
OpenCart 3.0.3.7 Cross-Site Request Forgery via account/password
OpenCart 3.0.3.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to change user passwords by sending crafted requests to the account/password endpoint. Attackers can trick authenticated users into submitting hidden forms with new password values in the 'password' and 'confirm' parameters to hijack accounts.
CVE-2021-47946 Média · 5.3 CWE-352 10/05/2026
OpenCart 3.0.3.6 Account Takeover via Cross Site Request Forgery
OpenCart 3.0.3.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the /account/edit endpoint that allows unauthenticated attackers to modify victim account details by tricking users into visiting malicious pages. Attackers can craft CSRF payloads that change victim email addresses and account information, then use password reset functionality to gain unauthorized access to compromised accounts.
CVE-2026-8194 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 09/05/2026
osTicket Dispatcher class.dispatcher.php cross-site request forgery
A security vulnerability has been detected in osTicket up to 1.18.3. Impacted is an unknown function of the file include/class.dispatcher.php of the component Dispatcher. The manipulation of the argument _method leads to cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through a pull request but has not reacted yet.
CVE-2026-42286 Alta · 8.4 CWE-352 08/05/2026
Emlog: Cross-Site Request Forgery in Admin Functions
Emlog is an open source website building system. Prior to version 2.6.11, missing CSRF protection in critical admin functions allows attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unauthorized actions like system registration, plugin management, and configuration changes. This issue has been patched in version 2.6.11.
CVE-2026-42190 Média · 5.3 CWE-352 08/05/2026
RedwoodSDK: Same-site CSRF in in server actions
RedwoodSDK is a server-first React framework. From version 1.0.0-beta.50 to before version 1.2.3, server actions in rwsdk apply HTTP method enforcement but no origin validation. A request originating from a different origin that the browser treats as same-site can invoke a server action with the victim's session cookie attached. This issue has been patched in version 1.2.3.
CVE-2026-5791 Média · 6.5 CWE-352 07/05/2026
CSRF in DivvyDrive Information Technologies' DivvyDrive
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DivvyDrive Information Technologies Inc. DivvyDrive allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects DivvyDrive: from 4.8.2.9 before 4.8.3.2.
CVE-2026-27415 Média · 4.3 CWE-352 07/05/2026
WordPress BEAR plugin <= 1.1.5 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PluginUs.Net BEAR allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects BEAR: from n/a through 1.1.5.