Início / CVEs
Base de CVEs
Vulnerabilidades publicadas, com severidade, exploração conhecida e fontes oficiais.
CVE-2026-34228
Média · 6.5
CWE-352 03/04/2026
Emlog: CSRF in Backend Upgrade Interface Leading to Arbitrary Remote SQL Execution and Arbitrary File Write
Emlog is an open source website building system. Prior to version 2.6.8, the backend upgrade interface accepts remote SQL and ZIP URLs via GET parameters. The server first downloads and executes the SQL file, then downloads the ZIP file and extracts it directly into the web root directory. This process does not validate a CSRF token. Therefore, an attacker only needs to trick an authenticated administrator into visiting a malicious link to achieve arbitrary SQL execution and arbitrary file write. This issue has been patched in version 2.6.8.
CVE-2025-36375
Alta · 8.8
CWE-352 01/04/2026
IBM DataPower Gateway vulnerable to CSRF
IBM DataPower Gateway 10.6CD 10.6.1.0 through 10.6.5.0 and IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.20 and IBM DataPower Gateway 10.6.0 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.8 IBM DataPower Gateway is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
CVE-2026-34749
Média · 5.4
CWE-352 01/04/2026
Payload has a CSRF Protection Bypass in Authentication Flow
Payload is a free and open source headless content management system. Prior to version 3.79.1, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the authentication flow. Under certain conditions, the configured CSRF protection could be bypassed, allowing cross-site requests to be made. This issue has been patched in version 3.79.1.
CVE-2026-34613
Média · 6.5
CWE-352 31/03/2026
AVideo: CSRF on Plugin Enable/Disable Endpoint Allows Disabling Security Plugins
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions 26.0 and prior, the AVideo endpoint objects/pluginSwitch.json.php allows administrators to enable or disable any installed plugin. The endpoint checks for an active admin session but does not validate a CSRF token. Additionally, the plugins database table is explicitly listed in ignoreTableSecurityCheck(), which means the ORM-level Referer/Origin domain validation in ObjectYPT::save() is also bypassed. Combined with SameSite=None on session cookies, an attacker can disable critical security plugins (such as LoginControl for 2FA, subscription enforcement, or access control plugins) by luring an admin to a malicious page. At time of publication, there are no publicly available patches.
CVE-2026-34611
Média · 6.5
CWE-352 31/03/2026
AVideo: CSRF on emailAllUsers.json.php Enables Mass Phishing Email to All Users
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions 26.0 and prior, the AVideo endpoint objects/emailAllUsers.json.php allows administrators to send HTML emails to every registered user on the platform. While the endpoint verifies admin session status, it does not validate a CSRF token. Because AVideo sets SameSite=None on session cookies, a cross-origin POST request from an attacker-controlled page will include the admin's session cookie automatically. An attacker who lures an admin to a malicious page can send an arbitrary HTML email to every user on the platform, appearing to originate from the instance's legitimate SMTP address. At time of publication, there are no publicly available patches.
CVE-2026-34394
Alta · 8.1
CWE-352 31/03/2026
AVideo: CSRF on Admin Plugin Configuration Enables Payment Credential Hijacking
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions 26.0 and prior, AVideo's admin plugin configuration endpoint (admin/save.json.php) lacks any CSRF token validation. There is no call to isGlobalTokenValid() or verifyToken() before processing the request. Combined with the application's explicit SameSite=None cookie policy, an attacker can forge cross-origin POST requests from a malicious page to overwrite arbitrary plugin settings on a victim administrator's session. Because the plugins table is included in the ignoreTableSecurityCheck() array in objects/Object.php, standard table-level access controls are also bypassed. This allows a complete takeover of platform functionality by reconfiguring payment processors, authentication providers, cloud storage credentials, and more. At time of publication, there are no publicly available patches.
CVE-2026-34384
Alta · 7.3
CWE-352 31/03/2026
Admidio: Missing CSRF Protection on Registration Approval Actions
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.8, the create_user, assign_member, and assign_user action modes in modules/registration.php approve pending user registrations via GET request without validating a CSRF token. Unlike the delete_user mode in the same file (which correctly validates the token), these three approval actions read their parameters from $_GET and perform irreversible state changes without any protection. An attacker who has submitted a pending registration can extract their own user UUID from the registration confirmation email URL, then trick any user with the rol_approve_users right into visiting a crafted URL that automatically approves the registration. This bypasses the manual registration approval workflow entirely. This issue has been patched in version 5.0.8.
CVE-2026-34382
Média · 4.6
CWE-352 31/03/2026
Admidio: Missing CSRF Protection on Custom List Deletion in mylist_function.php
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. From version 5.0.0 to before version 5.0.8, the delete mode handler in mylist_function.php permanently deletes list configurations without validating a CSRF token. An attacker who can lure an authenticated user to a malicious page can silently destroy that user's list configurations — including organization-wide shared lists when the victim holds administrator rights. This issue has been patched in version 5.0.8.
CVE-2026-3191
Média · 5.4
CWE-352 31/03/2026
Minify HTML <= 2.1.12 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Plugin Settings Update
The Minify HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.12. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'minify_html_menu_options' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-33373
Alta · 8.8
CWE-352 30/03/2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) em Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite
An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.0 and 10.1. A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Zimbra Web Client due to the issuance of authentication tokens without CSRF protection during certain account state transitions. Specifically, tokens generated after operations such as enabling two-factor authentication or changing a password may lack CSRF enforcement. While such a token is active, authenticated SOAP requests that trigger token generation or state changes can be performed without CSRF validation. An attacker could exploit this by inducing a victim to submit crafted requests, potentially allowing sensitive account actions such as disabling two-factor authentication. The issue is mitigated by ensuring CSRF protection is consistently enforced for all issued authentication tokens.
CVE-2026-4315
Média · 6.5
CWE-352 30/03/2026
WatchGuard Firebox Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Fireware Web UI
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WatchGuard Fireware OS WebUI could allow a remote attacker to trigger a denial-of-service (DoS) condition in the Fireware Web UI by convincing an authenticated administrator into visiting a malicious web page.
CVE-2026-4971
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 27/03/2026
SourceCodester Note Taking App cross-site request forgery
A weakness has been identified in SourceCodester Note Taking App up to 1.0. This impacts an unknown function. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
CVE-2026-4968
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 27/03/2026
SourceCodester Diary App diary.php cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability was determined in SourceCodester Diary App 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file diary.php. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
CVE-2026-4393
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 26/03/2026
Automated Logout - Moderately critical - Cross-site request forgery - SA-CONTRIB-2026-030
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Automated Logout allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Automated Logout: from 0.0.0 before 1.7.0, from 2.0.0 before 2.0.2.
CVE-2026-1032
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 26/03/2026
Conditional Menus <= 1.2.6 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Menu Options Update
The Conditional Menus plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'save_options' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify conditional menu assignments via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-36422
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 25/03/2026
IBM InfoSphere Information Server is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery
IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7.0.0 through 11.7.1.6 IBM InfoSphere DataStage Flow Designer is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
CVE-2026-3857
Alta · 8.8
CWE-352 25/03/2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.10 before 18.8.7, 18.9 before 18.9.3, and 18.10 before 18.10.1 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary GraphQL mutations on behalf of authenticated users due to insufficient CSRF protection.
CVE-2026-27659
Média · 4.6
CWE-352 25/03/2026
CSRF vulnerability in UpdateAccessControlPolicyActiveStatus endpoint
Mattermost versions 11.2.x <= 11.2.2, 10.11.x <= 10.11.10, 11.4.x <= 11.4.0, 11.3.x <= 11.3.1 fail to properly validate CSRF tokens in the /api/v4/access_control_policies/{policy_id}/activate endpoint, which allows an attacker to trick an admin into changing access control policy active status via a crafted request.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00578
CVE-2026-3211
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 25/03/2026
Theme Negotiation by Rules - Moderately critical - Cross-site request forgery - SA-CONTRIB-2026-012
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Theme Negotiation by Rules allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Theme Negotiation by Rules: from 0.0.0 before 1.2.1.
CVE-2025-40841
Média · 4.3
CWE-352 25/03/2026
Ericsson Indoor Connect 8855 - Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
Ericsson Indoor Connect 8855 versions prior to 2025.Q3 contains a
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability which, if exploited, can lead
to unauthorized modification of certain information.
CVE-2026-29839
Alta · 8.8
CWE-352 24/03/2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) em Dedecms
DedeCMS v5.7.118 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /sys_task_add.php.
CVE-2026-33252
Média · 6.5
CWE-352 23/03/2026
MCP Go SDK Allows Cross-Site Tool Execution for HTTP Servers without Authorizatrion
The Go MCP SDK used Go's standard encoding/json. Prior to version 1.4.1, the Go SDK's Streamable HTTP transport accepted browser-generated cross-site `POST` requests without validating the `Origin` header and without requiring `Content-Type: application/json`. In deployments without Authorization, especially stateless or sessionless configurations, this allows an arbitrary website to send MCP requests to a local server and potentially trigger tool execution. Version 1.4.1 contains a patch for the issue.
CVE-2026-33649
Alta · 8.8
CWE-352 23/03/2026
AVideo's GET-Based CSRF in setPermission.json.php Enables Privilege Escalation via Arbitrary Permission Modification
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 26.0, the `plugin/Permissions/setPermission.json.php` endpoint accepts GET parameters for a state-changing operation that modifies user group permissions. The endpoint has no CSRF token validation, and the application explicitly sets `session.cookie_samesite=None` on session cookies. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to craft a page with `<img>` tags that, when visited by an admin, silently grant arbitrary permissions to the attacker's user group — escalating the attacker to near-admin access. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available.
CVE-2026-33507
Alta · 8.8
CWE-352 23/03/2026
AVideo Affected by CSRF on Plugin Import Endpoint Enables Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Malicious Plugin Upload
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 26.0, the `objects/pluginImport.json.php` endpoint allows admin users to upload and install plugin ZIP files containing executable PHP code, but lacks any CSRF protection. Combined with the application explicitly setting `session.cookie_samesite = 'None'` for HTTPS connections, an unauthenticated attacker can craft a page that, when visited by an authenticated admin, silently uploads a malicious plugin containing a PHP webshell, achieving Remote Code Execution on the server. Commit d1bc1695edd9ad4468a48cea0df6cd943a2635f3 contains a patch.
CVE-2026-4590
Baixa · 3.1
CWE-352 23/03/2026
kalcaddle kodbox loginSubmit API index.class.php cross-site request forgery
A security flaw has been discovered in kalcaddle kodbox 1.64. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /workspace/source-code/plugins/oauth/controller/bind/index.class.php of the component loginSubmit API. Performing a manipulation of the argument third results in cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.