CVE Intelligence
Início / CVEs

Base de CVEs

Vulnerabilidades publicadas, com severidade, exploração conhecida e fontes oficiais.

Severidade
Limpar

467 resultado(s)

Exportar esta busca: RSS · CSV · STIX
CVE-2026-65339 Média · 5.0 CWE-693 17/08/2026
A logic issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.6.1 and…
A logic issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.6.1 and iPadOS 26.6.1, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.6.2, tvOS 27, visionOS 27, watchOS 27. An app may be able to leak sensitive user information.
CVE-2026-47686 Crítica · 9.9 CWE-693 17/08/2026
vm2: Missing Error.cause Sanitization Enables VM2 Sandbox Escape to RCE
vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to 3.11.6, handleException() in lib/setup-sandbox.js sanitizes SuppressedError.error, SuppressedError.suppressed, and AggregateError.errors but does not sanitize Error.cause, allowing sandbox code to obtain a powerful host object such as process from an embedder-exposed host function that throws an error with that object as its cause and then execute arbitrary host commands. This issue is fixed in version 3.11.6.
CVE-2026-74896 Crítica · 9.8 CWE-693 17/08/2026
openssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 Sandbox Escape via Dunder Attribute Traversal
openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.0 contain a sandbox escape vulnerability in the DangerousPatternVisitor AST analyzer that fails to detect dunder attribute traversal techniques. Attackers can use __class__, __bases__, __subclasses__(), and __globals__ chains to access restricted functions and execute arbitrary system commands from plugin code.
CVE-2026-74895 Crítica · 9.8 CWE-693 17/08/2026
openssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 Plugin Sandbox Bypass via Process Isolation
openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.0 fail to apply sandbox restrictions in the default process isolation mode for plugin execution. Attackers can execute malicious plugins with unrestricted access to the filesystem, network, subprocess execution, and all Python modules.
CVE-2026-74883 Alta · 8.8 CWE-693 17/08/2026
openssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 Sandbox Bypass via pathlib and io
openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.0 contain a sandbox bypass vulnerability where the plugin sandbox fails to restrict alternative file access methods like pathlib.Path and io.open. Attackers can import pathlib or io modules to read and write arbitrary files, completely bypassing the restricted_open file access controls.
CVE-2026-74790 Crítica · 9.1 CWE-693 16/08/2026
Scriban before 7.0.0 MemberFilter Bypass via TemplateContext Cache
Scriban before 7.0.0 caches TypedObjectAccessor by Type only without considering MemberFilter changes, allowing reused TemplateContext instances to expose members that should be hidden. Attackers can access filtered properties and fields by reusing a TemplateContext after tightening its MemberFilter, bypassing sandbox policies across requests or tenants.
CVE-2026-17079 Média · 4.3 CWE-693 14/08/2026
IBM Db2 Mirror for i is affected by multiple vulnerabilities
IBM Db2 Mirror for i 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to the ability to disable server-side input validation via a request parameter.
CVE-2026-18428 Alta · 8.8 CWE-693 13/08/2026
SQL Query Validation Bypass in OpenSearch Direct Query
A SQL query validation bypass in the Flint extension query handler in the OpenSearch SQL plugin allows a remote authenticated actor with async query access to execute arbitrary code on Apache Spark workers by sending a crafted SQL query to the direct query endpoint.
CVE-2026-0293 Média · 6.0 CWE-693 13/08/2026
Prisma Access Agent: Anti-Tamper Protection Bypass on Windows
A vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Prisma® Access Agent on Windows enables a local attacker with administrator privileges to bypass the anti-tamper protection, enabling unauthorized access to protected processes and files. The Prisma Access Agent on Linux, macOS, iOS, Android, and Chrome OS is not affected.
CVE-2026-73288 Média · 6.1 CWE-693 12/08/2026
RustFS: Object Lock (WORM) protections are treated as absent when bucket metadata cannot be read, allowing retained objects to be deleted
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. Prior to 1.0.0-rc.1, RustFS Object Lock enforcement in crates/ecstore/src/bucket/object_lock/objectlock_sys.rs lets check_object_lock_for_deletion, delete_prefix, and lifecycle and scanner sweeps treat ConfigNotFound, unreadable .metadata.bin data, or unparseable metadata as no lock configuration, allowing objects under COMPLIANCE retention to be deleted or expired. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.0-rc.1.
CVE-2025-59326 Crítica · 9.8 CWE-693 12/08/2026
CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to enforce IMA policy…
CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to enforce IMA policy protections across temporary file systems, allowing for unsigned code to be executed from these locations.
CVE-2026-73217 Alta · 7.7 CWE-693 11/08/2026
Cursor: Sandbox escape via tampered Python virtual environments
Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. Prior to 3.1.2, Cursor IDE for macOS allows an agent running in Auto-Run Sandbox mode to replace a virtual environment's Python executable with a malicious wrapper that the Microsoft Python extension invokes outside the sandbox, allowing arbitrary host commands with the user's privileges, including modifying files outside the workspace and launching applications. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.2.
CVE-2026-73083 Alta · 7.6 CWE-693 11/08/2026
Activepieces: V8 Isolate Sandbox Bypass via importFresh Module Loading
Activepieces is an open source AI workflow automation platform. Prior to 0.80.0, in SANDBOX_CODE_ONLY mode, the engine loads the compiled user module with importFresh(), a wrapper around Node.js require(), before the V8 isolate is applied. Top-level module code can therefore call require('child_process'), access fs, and use other Node.js APIs in the host engine process outside the sandbox. An authenticated user who can create a Code step can read environment secrets including AP_ENCRYPTION_KEY and AP_JWT_SECRET, read or write files, and reach internal services. This issue is fixed in version 0.80.0.
CVE-2026-69278 Alta · 7.8 CWE-693 11/08/2026
Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
Incorrect authorization in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
CVE-2026-62902 Média · 6.5 CWE-693 11/08/2026
.NET Information Disclosure Vulnerability
Inclusion of functionality from untrusted control sphere in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
CVE-2026-54981 Alta · 7.8 CWE-693 11/08/2026
Visual Studio Code Python Extension Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
Inclusion of functionality from untrusted control sphere in Visual Studio Code - Python extension allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
CVE-2026-39452 Alta · 7.3 CWE-693 11/08/2026
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) Transfer Learning Tool before version…
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) Transfer Learning Tool before version v0.7 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (low), integrity (low) and availability (low) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
CVE-2026-28757 Média · 6.7 CWE-693 11/08/2026
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) Workload Services Framework software…
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) Workload Services Framework software within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
CVE-2026-28707 Média · 5.4 CWE-693 11/08/2026
Protection mechanism failure for some LLM-on-Ray before version 1.0 within Ring 3: User…
Protection mechanism failure for some LLM-on-Ray before version 1.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
CVE-2026-24693 Média · 6.7 CWE-693 11/08/2026
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) oneCCL Bindings for PyTorch before…
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) oneCCL Bindings for PyTorch before version v2.8.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
CVE-2026-21387 Média · 5.4 CWE-693 11/08/2026
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) LLM Library for PyTorch within Ring 3…
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) LLM Library for PyTorch within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
CVE-2026-21400 Média · 6.7 CWE-693 11/08/2026
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) AI Reference Models before version v3.4.1 within...
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) AI Reference Models before version v3.4.1 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
CVE-2026-20906 Média · 6.7 CWE-693 11/08/2026
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) Neural Compressor software before version…
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) Neural Compressor software before version v3.6 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
CVE-2026-20903 Média · 5.4 CWE-693 11/08/2026
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) AI Containers before version v0.4.0…
Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) AI Containers before version v0.4.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
CVE-2026-20770 Média · 5.4 CWE-693 11/08/2026
Protection mechanism failure for some Cluster Management Toolkit for Kubernetes software…
Protection mechanism failure for some Cluster Management Toolkit for Kubernetes software before version v0.8.5 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.