CVE Intelligence
Início / CVEs

Base de CVEs

Vulnerabilidades publicadas, com severidade, exploração conhecida e fontes oficiais.

Severidade
Limpar

162 resultado(s)

Exportar esta busca: RSS · CSV · STIX
CVE-2025-11468 Média · 5.7 CWE-93 20/01/2026
Folding email comments of unfoldable characters doesn't preserve parenthesis
When folding a long comment in an email header containing exclusively unfoldable characters, the parenthesis would not be preserved. This could be used for injecting headers into email messages where addresses are user-controlled and not sanitized.
CVE-2026-23829 Média · 5.3 Exploit público CWE-93 18/01/2026
Mailpit has SMTP Header Injection via Regex Bypass
Mailpit is an email testing tool and API for developers. Prior to version 1.28.3, Mailpit's SMTP server is vulnerable to Header Injection due to an insufficient Regular Expression used to validate `RCPT TO` and `MAIL FROM` addresses. An attacker can inject arbitrary SMTP headers (or corrupt existing ones) by including carriage return characters (`\r`) in the email address. This header injection occurs because the regex intended to filter control characters fails to exclude `\r` and `\n` when used inside a character class. Version 1.28.3 fixes this issue.
CVE-2026-22777 Alta · 7.5 CWE-93 10/01/2026
ComfyUI-Manager is Vulnerable to CRLF Injection in Configuration Handler
ComfyUI-Manager is an extension designed to enhance the usability of ComfyUI. Prior to versions 3.39.2 and 4.0.5, an attacker can inject special characters into HTTP query parameters to add arbitrary configuration values to the config.ini file. This can lead to security setting tampering or modification of application behavior. This issue has been patched in versions 3.39.2 and 4.0.5.
CVE-2026-21428 Alta · 7.5 CWE-93 01/01/2026
cpp-httplib has CRLF injection in http headers
cpp-httplib is a C++11 single-file header-only cross platform HTTP/HTTPS library. Prior to version 0.30.0, the ``write_headers`` function does not check for CR & LF characters in user supplied headers, allowing untrusted header value to escape header lines. This vulnerability allows attackers to add extra headers, modify request body unexpectedly & trigger an SSRF attack. When combined with a server that supports http1.1 pipelining (springboot, python twisted etc), this can be used for server side request forgery (SSRF). Version 0.30.0 fixes this issue.
CVE-2022-50682 Média · 6.5 CWE-93 18/12/2025
Kentico Xperience <= 13.0.79 Routing Engine CRLF Injection
A CRLF injection vulnerability in Kentico Xperience allows attackers to manipulate URL query string redirects via improper encoding in the routing engine. This could enable header injection and potentially facilitate further web application attacks.
CVE-2025-67735 Média · 6.5 CWE-93 15/12/2025
Netty has a CRLF Injection vulnerability in io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpRequestEncoder
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. In versions prior to 4.1.129.Final and 4.2.8.Final, the `io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpRequestEncoder` has a CRLF injection with the request URI when constructing a request. This leads to request smuggling when `HttpRequestEncoder` is used without proper sanitization of the URI. Any application / framework using `HttpRequestEncoder` can be subject to be abused to perform request smuggling using CRLF injection. Versions 4.1.129.Final and 4.2.8.Final fix the issue.
CVE-2025-54972 Média · 4.3 CWE-93 18/11/2025
An improper neutralization of crlf sequences ('crlf injection') vulnerability in…
An improper neutralization of crlf sequences ('crlf injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, FortiMail 7.2 all versions, FortiMail 7.0 all versions may allow an attacker to inject headers in the response via convincing a user to click on a specifically crafted link
CVE-2025-59151 Alta · 8.2 CWE-93 27/10/2025
Pi-hole Admin Interface vulnerable to HTTP response header injection via CRLF injection
Pi-hole Admin Interface is a web interface for managing Pi-hole, a network-level advertisement and internet tracker blocking application. Pi-hole Admin Interface before 6.3 is vulnerable to Carriage Return Line Feed (CRLF) injection. When a request is made to a file ending with the .lp extension, the application performs a redirect without properly sanitizing the input. An attacker can inject carriage return and line feed characters (%0d%0a) to manipulate both the headers and the content of the HTTP response. This enables the injection of arbitrary HTTP response headers, potentially leading to session fixation, cache poisoning, and the weakening or bypassing of browser-based security mechanisms such as Content Security Policy or X-XSS-Protection. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.3.
CVE-2025-56007 Média · 6.5 CWE-93 23/10/2025
CRLF-injection in KeeneticOS before 4.3 at "/auth" API endpoint allows attackers to take…
CRLF-injection in KeeneticOS before 4.3 at "/auth" API endpoint allows attackers to take over the device via adding additional users with full permissions by managing the victim to open page with exploit.
CVE-2025-59419 Média · 5.5 CWE-93 15/10/2025
Netty netty-codec-smtp SMTP Command Injection Vulnerability Allowing Email Forgery
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. In versions prior to 4.1.128.Final and 4.2.7.Final, the SMTP codec in Netty contains an SMTP command injection vulnerability due to insufficient input validation for Carriage Return (\r) and Line Feed (\n) characters in user-supplied parameters. The vulnerability exists in io.netty.handler.codec.smtp.DefaultSmtpRequest, where parameters are directly concatenated into the SMTP command string without sanitization. When methods such as SmtpRequests.rcpt(recipient) are called with a malicious string containing CRLF sequences, attackers can inject arbitrary SMTP commands. Because the injected commands are sent from the server's trusted IP address, resulting emails will likely pass SPF and DKIM authentication checks, making them appear legitimate. This allows remote attackers who can control SMTP command parameters (such as email recipients) to forge arbitrary emails from the trusted server, potentially impersonating executives and forging high-stakes corporate communications. This issue has been patched in versions 4.1.129.Final and 4.2.8.Final. No known workarounds exist.
CVE-2019-9947 Média · 6.1 CWE-93 23/03/2019
An issue was discovered in urllib2 in Python 2.x through 2.7.16 and urllib in Python 3.x through...
An issue was discovered in urllib2 in Python 2.x through 2.7.16 and urllib in Python 3.x through 3.7.3. CRLF injection is possible if the attacker controls a url parameter, as demonstrated by the first argument to urllib.request.urlopen with \r\n (specifically in the path component of a URL that lacks a ? character) followed by an HTTP header or a Redis command. This is similar to the CVE-2019-9740 query string issue. This is fixed in: v2.7.17, v2.7.17rc1, v2.7.18, v2.7.18rc1; v3.5.10, v3.5.10rc1, v3.5.8, v3.5.8rc1, v3.5.8rc2, v3.5.9; v3.6.10, v3.6.10rc1, v3.6.11, v3.6.11rc1, v3.6.12, v3.6.9, v3.6.9rc1; v3.7.4, v3.7.4rc1, v3.7.4rc2, v3.7.5, v3.7.5rc1, v3.7.6, v3.7.6rc1, v3.7.7, v3.7.7rc1, v3.7.8, v3.7.8rc1, v3.7.9.
CVE-2019-9740 Média · 6.1 CWE-93 13/03/2019
An issue was discovered in urllib2 in Python 2.x through 2.7.16 and urllib in Python 3.x through...
An issue was discovered in urllib2 in Python 2.x through 2.7.16 and urllib in Python 3.x through 3.7.3. CRLF injection is possible if the attacker controls a url parameter, as demonstrated by the first argument to urllib.request.urlopen with \r\n (specifically in the query string after a ? character) followed by an HTTP header or a Redis command. This is fixed in: v2.7.17, v2.7.17rc1, v2.7.18, v2.7.18rc1; v3.5.10, v3.5.10rc1, v3.5.8, v3.5.8rc1, v3.5.8rc2, v3.5.9; v3.6.10, v3.6.10rc1, v3.6.11, v3.6.11rc1, v3.6.12, v3.6.9, v3.6.9rc1; v3.7.4, v3.7.4rc1, v3.7.4rc2, v3.7.5, v3.7.5rc1, v3.7.6, v3.7.6rc1, v3.7.7, v3.7.7rc1, v3.7.8, v3.7.8rc1, v3.7.9.