CVE Intelligence
Início / CVEs

Base de CVEs

Vulnerabilidades publicadas, com severidade, exploração conhecida e fontes oficiais.

Severidade
Limpar

1.410 resultado(s)

Exportar esta busca: RSS · CSV · STIX
CVE-2026-52656 Crítica · 9.8 CWE-94 20/07/2026
An issue in SJCAM AllWinner Tech products SJ4000-Air V1.4C and before and Whitelabel…
An issue in SJCAM AllWinner Tech products SJ4000-Air V1.4C and before and Whitelabel based v.1.4C and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted FEX file
CVE-2026-51385 Média · 6.9 CWE-94 20/07/2026
An issue in safishamsi Open-Source GRAPHIFY v.0.3.2 through v0.4.29 allows a remote…
An issue in safishamsi Open-Source GRAPHIFY v.0.3.2 through v0.4.29 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the validate_url, safe_fetch, _build_opener, _fetch_html and _download_binary functions.
CVE-2026-60026 Alta · 8.9 CWE-94 20/07/2026
Joomla Extension - themexpert.com - Authenticated PHP code execution in Quix Page Builder < 6.2.1
Joomla Extension - themexpert.com - Authenticated PHP code execution in Quix Page Builder < 6.2.1 - The Joomla extension Quix Page Builder Pro is vulnerable to an authenticated PHP code execution. Authenticated builder user (core.create/core.edit) could inject PHP tags in element content, that got executed via view-cache include(). Requires caching on (default).
CVE-2026-44359 Crítica · 10.0 CWE-94 19/07/2026
Meshtastic GitHub repo vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution via pull_request_target Fork Checkout in CI Workflow
Meshtastic is an open source mesh networking solution. Prior to version 2.7.21.1370b23, the Meshtastic GitHub repository's main_matrix.yml workflow is triggered by pull_request_target and multiple jobs check out the attacker's fork code and execute it with access to repository secrets and elevated GITHUB_TOKEN permissions. No approval gate exists. Pull requests from external users with author_association: "NONE" triggered the CI workflow automatically. The workflow directly executes attacker-controlled files from the fork checkout. This issue could have resulted in supply chain compromise, self-hosted runner compromise, and/or repository takeover for the repo. This issue is separate from GHSA-6mwm-v2vv-pp96, which addressed a command injection via github.head_ref in the setup job of the same workflow. That fix correctly moved to environment variables. However, the more critical fork checkout vulnerability across the check, build, and build-debian-src jobs was not addressed. Version 2.7.21.1370b23 contains a patch for thie issue.
CVE-2026-16151 Média · 6.3 CWE-94 18/07/2026
CartoDB carto-api-client filters.ts addFilter prototype pollution
A vulnerability has been found in CartoDB carto-api-client 0.5.29. This impacts the function addFilter of the file src/filters.ts. Such manipulation of the argument column leads to improperly controlled modification of object prototype attributes. The attack can be executed remotely. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
CVE-2026-16150 Média · 6.3 CWE-94 18/07/2026
RobinHerbots Inputmask Internal Deep Merge Helper extend.js extendAliases prototype pollution
A vulnerability was found in RobinHerbots Inputmask up to 5.0.9. Affected by this issue is the function extendDefaults/extendDefinitions/extendAliases in the library lib/dependencyLibs/extend.js of the component Internal Deep Merge Helper. The manipulation results in improperly controlled modification of object prototype attributes. The attack may be performed from remote. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
CVE-2026-9147 Alta · 7.8 CWE-94 18/07/2026
uproot 5.7.4 and prior Code Injection via TStreamerInfo Metadata
uproot dynamically generates Python class source code from ROOT TStreamerInfo records in a file and compiles it at runtime. Some file-controlled streamer metadata fields (for example, streamer element names) are interpolated into the generated Python source without safe quoting via repr() or the !r format specifier. An attacker who can supply a crafted ROOT file can place Python expression-breaking content into a streamer metadata field. When uproot generates and invokes the corresponding reader method, the injected Python expression is evaluated in the context of the process opening the file, resulting in arbitrary Python code execution in applications that open or process attacker-controlled ROOT files with affected uproot code paths.
CVE-2026-47869 Alta · 8.8 CWE-94 18/07/2026
VMware Avi Load Balancer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
VMware Avi Load Balancer contains a remote code execution vulnerability. A malicious authenticated user with network access may be able to inject and execute code. Affected versions: 32.1.1 (fixed in 32.1.2) 31.1.1 through 31.2.2 (fixed in 31.2.2-2p3) 30.1.1 through 30.2.6 (fixed in 30.2.7) 22.1.1 through 22.1.7 (fixed in 30.2.7)
CVE-2026-47867 Alta · 8.8 CWE-94 18/07/2026
VMware Avi Load Balancer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
VMware Avi Load Balancer contains a remote code execution vulnerability. A malicious user with network access may be able to access the Avi Control plane and execute code remotely. Affected versions: 32.1.1 (fixed in 32.1.2) 31.1.1 through 31.2.2 (fixed in 31.2.2-2p3) 30.1.1 through 30.2.6 (fixed in 30.2.7) 22.1.1 through 22.1.7 (fixed in 30.2.7)
CVE-2026-8635 Crítica · 9.9 CWE-94 17/07/2026
Arbitrary Code Execution in Python Interpreter Component
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to escalate privileges to superuser by directly manipulating the database, execute arbitrary system commands, and achieve full system compromise with Langflow service permissions.
CVE-2026-8481 Crítica · 9.9 CWE-94 17/07/2026
Remote Code Execution via Code Validation Endpoint
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the code validation API endpoint. The POST /api/v1/validate/code endpoint accepts user-supplied Python code and executes it directly using Python's built-in exec() function without sandboxing, input validation, or privilege restrictions, enabling any authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands with the full privileges of the Langflow server process.
CVE-2026-8056 Alta · 8.8 CWE-94 17/07/2026
Parameter Injection Vulnerability in API Graph Execution Engine
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to override component parameters at runtime via the API. A critical security flaw exists in the parameter filtering mechanism within the `apply_tweaks()` function.
CVE-2026-9135 Crítica · 9.9 CWE-94 17/07/2026
Policies Component Dynamic CodeInput Fields Bypass Custom Component Validation
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integration that bypasses the allow_custom_components=false security control. The vulnerability exists because the validation mechanism only checks the main component source code in node_template["code"]["value"] but fails to validate dynamic CodeInput fields that store generated ToolGuard Python files. Attackers can embed malicious Python code in these unvalidated dynamic fields, which are persisted in Flow.data and later executed server-side when a guarded tool is invoked through the ToolGuard runtime. This allows authenticated users with flow creation privileges to achieve arbitrary Python code execution on the backend despite custom component restrictions. The vulnerability can be escalated through cross-tenant flow manipulation via the agentic MCP update_flow_component_field tool, which accepts attacker-controlled user_id parameters, enabling attackers to inject malicious code into victim users' flows. When combined with publicly accessible flows and specific misconfigurations (AUTO_LOGIN=true, NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true), the attack can be conducted with reduced authentication requirements.
CVE-2026-9762 Alta · 7.8 CWE-94 17/07/2026
IBM® Data Server driver for JDBC and SQLJ is vulnerable to remote code execution when jdbc url is under user control
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.4 is vulnerable to remote code execution when jdbc url is under user control.
CVE-2026-9198 Crítica · 9.8 KEV Urgente · 83 Exploit público CWE-94 17/07/2026
IBM Langflow Code Injection Vulnerability
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to chain /api/v1/auto_login (mints SUPERUSER tokens to any network caller) with /api/v1/validate/code (executes user code via exec()) to achieve full RCE on default Langflow deployments
CVE-2026-16008 Média · 6.3 CWE-94 17/07/2026
sagold json-schema-library propertyDependencies.ts parsePropertyDependencies prototype pollution
A security vulnerability has been detected in sagold json-schema-library 11.5.0/11.5.1. This impacts the function parsePropertyDependencies of the file src/keywords/propertyDependencies.ts. The manipulation leads to improperly controlled modification of object prototype attributes. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 11.6.0 will fix this issue. The identifier of the patch is 432287ee6f68a02ce6f015354618486ec427a32d. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
CVE-2026-46512 Crítica · 9.9 CWE-94 16/07/2026
Frogman: Dialplan template parameters interpolated into extensions_custom.conf without escaping
Frogman provides headless PBX control through MCP and HTTP API. Prior to 1.6.2, fm_dialplan_apply accepted template parameters including greeting, dest, url, extension, code, and file, and Tools/DialplanApply.php wrote Dialplan/Templates.php output to extensions_custom.conf while only Dialplan/TemplateBase.php:38-42 sanitized contextName(), allowing a PERM_WRITE caller using confirm:true to inject arbitrary Asterisk directives such as System(), Set(SHELL(...)), Goto, or Macro. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.2.
CVE-2026-46621 Crítica · 9.1 CWE-94 16/07/2026
Yamcs: Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Jython Algorithm Code Injection
Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.12.7, the Yamcs script evaluation engine for Python algorithms dynamically compiled and evaluated user-controlled algorithm text using Jython through the JSR-223 ScriptEngine API without enforcing a secure sandbox, so an authenticated user with the ChangeMissionDatabase privilege could override an existing Python algorithm's logic through the mission database REST API and import and execute arbitrary Java classes such as java.lang.Runtime to achieve remote code execution on the underlying host operating system. This issue is fixed in versions 5.12.7 and 5.13.0, which disable algorithm editing by default.
CVE-2026-46562 Crítica · 9.8 CWE-94 16/07/2026
Yamcs: Remote Code Execution via Mission Database algorithm override
Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.12.7, the Nashorn ScriptEngine used to evaluate user-supplied JavaScript algorithm text in yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/algorithms/ScriptAlgorithmExecutorFactory.java was constructed without a ClassFilter, so a user with the ChangeMissionDatabase privilege could override an algorithm through the MdbOverrideApi.updateAlgorithm endpoint and supply JavaScript that reaches arbitrary Java classes (for example Java.type("java.lang.Runtime").getRuntime().exec(...)) to execute arbitrary OS commands as the Yamcs process; in the default configuration with no security.yaml the built-in guest user has superuser=true, making the issue reachable without authentication. This issue is fixed in versions 5.12.7 and 5.13.0, which disable algorithm editing by default.
CVE-2026-44632 Crítica · 9.1 CWE-94 16/07/2026
Yamcs: Server-Side Code Injection (RCE) via Janino Expression Engine in `JavaExprAlgorithmExecutionFactory`
Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.12.7, a server-side code injection vulnerability existed in the Yamcs algorithm evaluation engine org.yamcs.algorithms.JavaExprAlgorithmExecutionFactory, which dynamically compiled and evaluated user-controlled algorithm text through the Janino compiler without enforcing a secure sandbox, so an authenticated user with the ChangeMissionDatabase privilege could override an existing algorithm's text via the mission database REST API and inject Java code (for example using java.lang.Runtime) to achieve remote code execution on the underlying host operating system. This issue is fixed in versions 5.12.7 and 5.13.0, which disable algorithm editing by default.
CVE-2026-59865 Crítica · 9.3 CWE-94 16/07/2026
Kiota: Command injection via x-ms-kiota-info dependencyInstallCommand surfaced by `kiota info`
Kiota is an OpenAPI based HTTP Client code generator. Prior to 1.29.1 and 1.32.5, `kiota info` read x-ms-kiota-info.languagesInformation.<language>.dependencyInstallCommand plus dependency name and version values from an OpenAPI description and presented the spec-supplied command as Kiota's recommended install command, allowing an attacker-controlled or compromised description to cause command injection when the suggested command was run manually or through the Kiota VS Code extension's kiota info --json dependency-install flow. This issue is fixed in version 1.29.1 and 1.32.5.
CVE-2026-53597 Alta · 8.7 CWE-94 16/07/2026
Prompty: Arbitrary code execution via JavaScript frontmatter in TypeScript loader
Prompty is a markdown file format (.prompty) for LLM prompts. From 2.0.0-alpha.1 until 2.0.0-beta.3, the @prompty/core TypeScript loader in runtime/typescript/packages/core/src/core/loader.ts used gray-matter without overriding executable js and javascript frontmatter engines, allowing an attacker-controlled .prompty file with ---js frontmatter to execute arbitrary JavaScript during prompt loading. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.0-beta.3.
CVE-2026-59862 Alta · 7.5 CWE-94 16/07/2026
Kiota: Code Generation Literal Injection in the Python Generator
Kiota is an OpenAPI based HTTP Client code generator. Prior to 1.29.1 and 1.32.0, Kiota's Python generator let attacker-controlled enum value descriptions from x-ms-enum.values[].description flow through KiotaBuilder.SetEnumOptions into Documentation.DescriptionTemplate and PythonConventionService.RemoveInvalidDescriptionCharacters without newline sanitization, allowing generated inline comments to split and execute attacker-controlled Python code at module scope when generated modules were imported. This issue is fixed in version 1.29.1 and 1.32.0.
CVE-2026-59861 Alta · 7.5 CWE-94 16/07/2026
Kiota: Code Generation Literal Injection in Kiota Ruby Generator
Kiota is an OpenAPI based HTTP Client code generator. Prior to 1.29.1 and 1.32.0, Kiota's Ruby generator embedded OpenAPI default fields, property names, and other schema-derived strings through CodeMethodWriter.cs and SanitizeForQuotedLiteral() in Writers/StringExtensions.cs into Ruby double-quoted literals without escaping #, allowing attacker-controlled #{expr}, #$var, or #@var interpolation markers to inject arbitrary Ruby code into generated model classes. This issue is fixed in version 1.29.1 and 1.32.0.
CVE-2026-59860 Alta · 8.7 CWE-94 16/07/2026
Kiota: XML Doc-Comment Newline Breakout Code Injection
Kiota is an OpenAPI based HTTP Client code generator. Prior to 1.29.1 and 1.32.3, Kiota is affected by a code-generation injection vulnerability in the C# XML documentation-comment sink (the description, externalDocs label, and externalDocs link fields emitted as /// … comments). When text from an OpenAPI description is written into single-line XML doc comments without stripping newline and Unicode line-terminator characters, an attacker can break out of the /// comment line and inject additional code into generated C# clients. This issue is fixed in version 1.29.1 and 1.32.3.