CVE Intelligence
Início / CVEs

Base de CVEs

Vulnerabilidades publicadas, com severidade, exploração conhecida e fontes oficiais.

Severidade
Limpar

1.418 resultado(s)

Exportar esta busca: RSS · CSV · STIX
CVE-2026-44005 Crítica · 10.0 CWE-94 13/05/2026
vm2 para Node.js: fuga de sandbox por modificação de protótipos do host
vm2 é uma sandbox/VM de código aberto para Node.js. Das versões 3.9.6 até 3.10.5, a ponte do vm2 expõe proxies mutáveis para protótipos intrínsecos do realm do host e, em seguida, encaminha escritas feitas dentro da sandbox para os objetos do host por meio de otherReflectSet() e otherReflectDefineProperty(), o que permite que JavaScript controlado por um atacante, executado em uma VM padrão ou em um NodeVM herdado, modifique Object.prototype, Array.prototype e Function.prototype compartilhados do host a partir de dentro da sandbox. Esta vulnerabilidade está corrigida na versão 3.11.0.
CVE-2026-43997 Crítica · 10.0 CWE-94 13/05/2026
vm2: Sandbox Escape
vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to 3.11.0, it is possible to obtain the host Object. There are various ways to use the host Object, to escape the sandbox, one example would be using HostObject.getOwnPropertySymbols to obtain Symbol(nodejs.util.inspect.custom). This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.0.
CVE-2026-44295 Alta · 8.7 CWE-94 13/05/2026
protobufjs-cli: Code injection in pbjs static output from crafted schema names
protobufjs-cli is the command line add-on for protobuf.js. Prior to 1.2.1 and 2.0.2, pbjs static code generation could emit unsafe JavaScript identifiers derived from schema-controlled names. When generating static JavaScript from a crafted schema or JSON descriptor, certain namespace, enum, service, or derived full names could be written into the generated output without sufficient sanitization. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.1 and 2.0.2.
CVE-2026-44293 Alta · 8.8 CWE-94 13/05/2026
protobufjs: Code injection through bytes field defaults in generated toObject code
protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript (JS) functions. Prior to 7.5.6 and 8.0.2, protobufjs generated JavaScript for toObject conversion could include an unsafe expression derived from a schema-controlled bytes field default value. A crafted descriptor with a non-string default value for a bytes field could cause attacker-controlled code to be emitted into the generated conversion function. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.5.6 and 8.0.2.
CVE-2026-44291 Alta · 8.1 CWE-94 13/05/2026
protobufjs: Code generation gadget after prototype pollution
protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript (JS) functions. Prior to 7.5.6 and 8.0.2, protobufjs used plain objects with inherited prototypes for internal type lookup tables used by generated encode and decode functions. If Object.prototype had already been polluted, those lookup tables could resolve attacker-controlled inherited properties as valid protobuf type information. This could cause attacker-controlled strings to be emitted into generated JavaScript code. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.5.6 and 8.0.2.
CVE-2026-43680 Alta · 7.2 CWE-94 12/05/2026
Code Injection em Claris Filemaker Cloud
A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in Claris FileMaker Cloud allowed a user with Admin Console privileges to bypass a front-end restriction on OS Script schedule types and execute arbitrary operating system commands on the underlying host. This issue is fixed in FileMaker Cloud 2.22.0.5.
CVE-2026-42288 Crítica · 10.0 CWE-94 12/05/2026
Injeção de Código Pré-Autenticação no Assistente de Configuração do ChurchCRM
O ChurchCRM é um sistema de gestão de igrejas de código aberto. Antes da versão 7.3.2, a correção da CVE-2026-39337 está incompleta. A vulnerabilidade de execução remota de código, sem autenticação prévia, no assistente de configuração do ChurchCRM, por meio de DB_PASSWORD sem sanitização, continua totalmente explorável. Esta vulnerabilidade está corrigida na versão 7.3.2.
CVE-2025-15463 Média · 6.5 CWE-94 12/05/2026
Advanced Custom Fields: Extended <= 0.9.2.3 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution
The The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.2.3. This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes.
CVE-2026-44262 Crítica · 9.4 Exploit público CWE-94 12/05/2026
Dedoc Scramble: execução remota de código via avaliação de entrada controlada pelo usuário em regras de validação
O Scramble gera documentação de API para projetos Laravel. A partir da versão 0.13.2 até antes da 0.13.22, quando os endpoints de documentação são acessíveis publicamente e as regras de validação referenciam entrada controlada pelo usuário, os dados enviados na requisição podem ser avaliados durante a geração da documentação, levando à execução de código PHP arbitrário no contexto da aplicação. Esta vulnerabilidade está corrigida na versão 0.13.22.
CVE-2026-44403 Alta · 7.2 Exploit público CWE-94 12/05/2026
Wing FTP Server < 8.1.3 Authenticated Remote Code Execution via Session Serialization
Wing FTP Server before 8.1.3 contains an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the session serialization mechanism that allows authenticated administrators to inject arbitrary Lua code through the domain admin mydirectory field. Attackers can exploit unsafe serialization of session values into Lua source code without proper escaping of closing delimiters, causing the injected code to be executed when the poisoned session is loaded via loadfile().
CVE-2026-8430 Alta · 8.1 CWE-94 12/05/2026
SPIP < 4.4.14 Remote Code Execution via nginx
SPIP versions prior to 4.4.14 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the public space that is limited to certain nginx configurations, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code in the context of the web server. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability through specific nginx configuration scenarios to achieve code execution, and this issue is not mitigated by the SPIP security screen.
CVE-2026-8429 Alta · 8.8 CWE-94 12/05/2026
SPIP < 4.4.14 Remote Code Execution via Private Space
SPIP versions prior to 4.4.14 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the private space that allows attackers to execute arbitrary code in the context of the web server. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability to achieve code execution that bypasses the SPIP security screen protections.
CVE-2026-42898 Crítica · 9.9 CWE-94 12/05/2026
Microsoft Dynamics 365 On-Premises Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Microsoft Dynamics 365 (on-premises) allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2026-41094 Alta · 8.8 CWE-94 12/05/2026
Microsoft Data Formulator Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Microsoft Data Formulator allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2026-31236 Crítica · 9.8 CWE-94 12/05/2026
The llm CLI tool thru 0.27.1 contains a critical code injection vulnerability via its…
The llm CLI tool thru 0.27.1 contains a critical code injection vulnerability via its --functions command-line argument. This argument is intended to allow users to provide custom Python function definitions. However, the tool directly executes the provided code using the unsafe exec() function without any sanitization, sandboxing, or security restrictions. An attacker can exploit this by crafting a malicious llm command with arbitrary Python code in the --functions argument and using social engineering to trick a victim into running it. This leads to arbitrary code execution on the victim's system, potentially granting the attacker full control.
CVE-2026-31233 Crítica · 9.8 CWE-94 12/05/2026
Guardrails AI thru 0.6.7 contains a code injection vulnerability (CWE-94) in its Hub…
Guardrails AI thru 0.6.7 contains a code injection vulnerability (CWE-94) in its Hub package installation mechanism. When installing validator packages via guardrails hub install, the system retrieves a manifest from the Guardrails Hub and dynamically executes a script specified in the post_install field. The script path is constructed from untrusted manifest data and executed without proper validation or sanitization, allowing remote code execution. An attacker who can publish malicious packages to the Hub can inject arbitrary code that will be executed on any system where a victim installs the malicious package.
CVE-2026-31231 Crítica · 9.8 CWE-94 12/05/2026
Cognee thru v0.4.0 contains a critical remote code execution vulnerability in its notebook cell...
Cognee thru v0.4.0 contains a critical remote code execution vulnerability in its notebook cell execution API endpoint. The endpoint is designed to execute arbitrary Python code provided by the user, but it does so using the unsafe exec() function without any sandboxing, validation, or security controls. An attacker can exploit this by sending a specially crafted POST request containing malicious Python code to the execution endpoint. This leads to arbitrary code execution on the Cognee server with the privileges of the server process, allowing complete compromise of the system.
CVE-2025-65719 Crítica · 9.8 CWE-94 12/05/2026
An issue in Open Source Kubectl MCP Server v1.1.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary…
An issue in Open Source Kubectl MCP Server v1.1.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code on a victim system via user interaction with a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2026-31228 Crítica · 9.8 CWE-94 12/05/2026
The Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART) thru 1.20.1 contains a remote code execution...
The Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART) thru 1.20.1 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in its Kubeflow component. The robustness evaluation function for PyTorch models uses the unsafe eval() function to dynamically evaluate user-supplied strings for the LossFn and Optimizer parameters without any sanitization or security restrictions. An attacker can exploit this by providing a specially crafted string that contains arbitrary Python code, which will be executed when eval() is called, leading to complete compromise of the system running the ART evaluation.
CVE-2026-31225 Alta · 8.8 CWE-94 12/05/2026
Superduper: Remote code execution via unsafe eval in superduper query parsing
The superduper project thru v0.10.0 contains a critical remote code execution vulnerability in its query parsing component. The _parse_op_part() function in query.py uses the unsafe eval() function to dynamically evaluate user-supplied query operands without proper sanitization or restriction. Although the function attempts to limit the execution context by providing a restricted global namespace, it does not block access to dangerous built-in functions. A remote attacker can exploit this by submitting a specially crafted query string containing Python code that imports modules (e.g., os) and executes arbitrary system commands, leading to complete compromise of the server.
CVE-2026-31220 Crítica · 9.8 CWE-94 12/05/2026
PySyft (Syft Datasite/Server) versions 0.9.5 and earlier are vulnerable to remote code…
PySyft (Syft Datasite/Server) versions 0.9.5 and earlier are vulnerable to remote code execution due to insufficient validation and sandboxing of user-submitted code. The system allows low-privileged users to submit Python functions (via @sy.syft_function()) for remote execution on the server. While a code approval mechanism exists, the submitted code undergoes no security checks for dangerous operations (e.g., file access, command execution). Once approved, the code is executed within the server process using exec() and eval() functions without proper isolation. A remote attacker can leverage this to execute arbitrary Python code on the server, leading to complete compromise of the server environment.
CVE-2026-31217 Crítica · 9.8 CWE-94 12/05/2026
The _load_model() function in the neural_magic_training.py script of the optimate project in...
The _load_model() function in the neural_magic_training.py script of the optimate project in commit a6d302f912b481c94370811af6b11402f51d377f (2024-07-21) allows arbitrary code execution. When a user supplies a directory path via the --model command-line argument, the function reads a module.py file from that directory and executes its contents directly using Python's exec() function. This design does not validate or sanitize the file's content, allowing an attacker who controls the input directory to execute arbitrary Python code in the context of the process running the script.
CVE-2026-40129 Média · 4.3 CWE-94 12/05/2026
Code Injection vulnerability in SAP Application Server ABAP for SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform
Due to a Code Injection vulnerability in SAP Application Server ABAP for SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform, an authenticated attacker could send specially crafted inputs to the application. If processed by the application, this input could be delivered to users subscribed to the channel and result in execution. Successful exploitation could enable the attacker to execute arbitrary code for other users, resulting in a low impact on the integrity, with no impact to the confidentiality and availability of the system.
CVE-2026-43874 Alta · 7.2 CWE-94 11/05/2026
WWBN AVideo: Incomplete Fix for YPTSocket autoEvalCodeOnHTML Strip: Unauthenticated Cross-User JavaScript Execution via `$msg['json']` Relay Bypass
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 29.0, the server-side mitigation for the YPTSocket autoEvalCodeOnHTML eval sink (from CVE-2026-40911) only strips the payload when it sits under $json['msg'], but the relay function msgToResourceId() selects the outbound message from $msg['json'] before $msg['msg']. An unauthenticated attacker can obtain a WebSocket token from plugin/YPTSocket/getWebSocket.json.php, connect to the WebSocket server, and send a message with autoEvalCodeOnHTML nested under a top-level json field — the strip branch is skipped, the relay delivers the payload verbatim to any logged-in user identified by to_users_id, and the client script runs it through eval(). Commit 9f3006f9a89a34daa67a83c6ad35f450cb91fcce contains an updated fix.
CVE-2026-37630 Alta · 7.3 CWE-94 11/05/2026
An issue in QuickJS-NG v.0.12.1 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the…
An issue in QuickJS-NG v.0.12.1 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the js_mapped_arguments_mark function