Início / CVEs
Base de CVEs
Vulnerabilidades publicadas, com severidade, exploração conhecida e fontes oficiais.
CVE-2026-41414
Alta · 7.4
CWE-94 24/04/2026
Skim: Arbitrary code execution via pull_request_target fork checkout in pr.yml
Skim is a fuzzy finder designed to through files, lines, and commands. The generate-files job in .github/workflows/pr.yml checks out attacker-controlled fork code and executes it via cargo run, with access to SKIM_RS_BOT_PRIVATE_KEY and GITHUB_TOKEN (contents:write). No gates prevent exploitation - any GitHub user can trigger this by opening a pull request from a fork. This vulnerability is fixed with commit bf63404ad51985b00ed304690ba9d477860a5a75.
CVE-2026-41138
Alta · 8.8
CWE-94 23/04/2026
Flowise: Remote code execution vulnerability in AirtableAgent.ts caused by lack of input verification when using Pandas.
Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.1.0, there is a remote code execution vulnerability in AirtableAgent.ts caused by lack of input verification when using Pandas. The user’s input is directly applied to the question parameter within the prompt template and it is reflected to the Python code without any sanitization. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.0.
CVE-2026-41137
Alta · 8.8
CWE-94 23/04/2026
Flowise: Code Injection in CSVAgent leads to Authenticated RCE
Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.1.0, The CSVAgent allows providing a custom Pandas CSV read code. Due to lack of sanitization, an attacker can provide a command injection payload that will get interpolated and executed by the server. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.0.
CVE-2026-41246
Alta · 8.1
CWE-94 23/04/2026
Contour: Lua code injection via Cookie Path Rewrite Policy
Contour is a Kubernetes ingress controller using Envoy proxy. From v1.19.0 to before v1.33.4, v1.32.5, and v1.31.6, Contour's Cookie Rewriting feature is vulnerable to Lua code injection. An attacker with RBAC permissions to create or modify HTTPProxy resources can craft a malicious value in spec.routes[].cookieRewritePolicies[].pathRewrite.value or spec.routes[].services[].cookieRewritePolicies[].pathRewrite.value that results in arbitrary code execution in the Envoy proxy. The cookie rewriting feature is internally implemented using Envoy's HTTP Lua filter. User-controlled values are interpolated into Lua source code using Go text/template without sufficient sanitization. The injected code only executes when processing traffic on the attacker's own route, which they already control. However, since Envoy runs as shared infrastructure, the injected code can also read Envoy's xDS client credentials from the filesystem or cause denial of service for other tenants sharing the Envoy instance. This vulnerability is fixed in v1.33.4, v1.32.5, and v1.31.6.
CVE-2026-39440
Crítica · 9.9
CWE-94 23/04/2026
Injeção de Código no Funnelforms FunnelFormsPro com Inclusão Remota de Código (CVE-2026-39440)
Vulnerabilidade de Controle Impróprio da Geração de Código ('Injeção de Código') no Funnelforms LLC FunnelFormsPro permite Inclusão Remota de Código.Este problema afeta o FunnelFormsPro: de n/a até 3.8.1.
CVE-2026-3960
Crítica · 9.8
CWE-94 23/04/2026
Remote Code Execution in h2oai/h2o-3
A critical remote code execution vulnerability exists in the unauthenticated REST API endpoint /99/ImportSQLTable in H2O-3 version 3.46.0.9 and prior. The vulnerability arises due to insufficient security controls in the parameter blacklist mechanism, which only targets MySQL JDBC driver-specific dangerous parameters. An attacker can bypass these controls by switching the JDBC URL protocol to jdbc:postgresql: and exploiting PostgreSQL JDBC driver-specific parameters such as socketFactory and socketFactoryArg. This allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on the H2O-3 server with the privileges of the H2O-3 process. The issue is resolved in version 3.46.0.10.
CVE-2026-41229
Crítica · 9.1
CWE-94 23/04/2026
Injeção de código PHP no Froxlor pela API de servidores MySQL (CVE-2026-41229)
Froxlor é um software open source de administração de servidores. Antes da versão 2.3.6, `PhpHelper::parseArrayToString()` grava valores de string em literais de string PHP delimitados por aspas simples sem escapar as aspas simples. Quando um administrador com a permissão `change_serversettings` adiciona ou atualiza um servidor MySQL via API, o parâmetro `privileged_user` (que não possui validação de entrada) é gravado sem escape em `lib/userdata.inc.php`. Como esse arquivo é carregado com `require` em toda requisição via `Database::getDB()`, um atacante pode injetar código PHP arbitrário que é executado como usuário do servidor web em cada carregamento de página subsequente. A versão 2.3.6 contém uma correção.
CVE-2026-41196
Crítica · 10.0
CWE-94 22/04/2026
Luanti has a mod security sandbox escape
Luanti (formerly Minetest) is an open source voxel game-creation platform. Starting in version 5.0.0 and prior to version 5.15.2, a malicious mod can trivially escape the sandboxed Lua environment to execute arbitrary code and gain full filesystem access on the user's device. This applies to the server-side mod, async and mapgen as well as the client-side (CSM) environments. This vulnerability is only exploitable when using LuaJIT. Version 5.15.2 contains a patch. On release versions, one can also patch this issue without recompiling by editing `builtin/init.lua` and adding the line `getfenv = nil` at the end. Note that this will break mods relying on this function (which is not inherently unsafe).
CVE-2026-41134
Alta · 7.8
CWE-94 22/04/2026
Kiota: Code Generation Literal Injection
Kiota is an OpenAPI based HTTP Client code generator. Versions prior to 1.29.1 and 1.31.1 are affected by a code-generation literal injection vulnerability in multiple writer sinks (for example: serialization/deserialization keys, path/query parameter mappings, URL template metadata, enum/property metadata, and default value emission). When malicious values from an OpenAPI description are emitted into generated source without context-appropriate escaping, an attacker can break out of string literals and inject additional code into generated clients. This issue is only practically exploitable when the OpenAPI description used for generation is from an untrusted source, or a normally trusted OpenAPI description has been compromised/tampered with. Only generating from trusted, integrity-protected API descriptions significantly reduces the risk. To remediate the issue, upgrade Kiota to 1.29.1, 1.31.1, or later and regenerate/refresh existing generated clients as a precaution. Refreshing generated clients ensures previously generated vulnerable code is replaced with hardened output.
CVE-2026-33608
Crítica · 9.8
CWE-94 22/04/2026
PowerDNS Authoritative: sanitização incompleta de nomes de domínio no tratamento de NOTIFY (CWE-94)
Um atacante pode enviar uma requisição notify que faz com que um novo domínio secundário seja adicionado ao backend bind, mas que também faz esse backend atualizar sua configuração para uma configuração inválida, impedindo-o de executar na próxima reinicialização e exigindo operação manual para corrigi-lo.
CVE-2026-40911
Crítica · 10.0
CWE-94 21/04/2026
WWBN AVideo YPTSocket: injeção de código via retransmissão WebSocket
O WWBN AVideo é uma plataforma de vídeo de código aberto. Nas versões 29.0 e anteriores, o servidor WebSocket do plugin YPTSocket retransmite corpos de mensagens JSON fornecidos pelo atacante a todos os clientes conectados, sem sanitizar os campos `msg` ou `callback`. No lado do cliente, `plugin/YPTSocket/script.js` contém dois sinks de `eval()` alimentados diretamente por esses campos retransmitidos (`json.msg.autoEvalCodeOnHTML` na linha 568 e `json.callback` na linha 95). Como os tokens são emitidos para visitantes anônimos e nunca revalidados além da descriptografia, um atacante não autenticado pode transmitir JavaScript arbitrário que é executado na origem de todos os usuários conectados no momento (incluindo administradores), resultando em tomada de contas universal, roubo de sessão e execução de ações privilegiadas. O commit c08694bf6264eb4decceb78c711baee2609b4efd contém uma correção.
CVE-2026-40602
Média · 5.6
CWE-94 21/04/2026
hass-cli: Handling of user-supplied Jinja2 templates
The Home Assistant Command-line interface (hass-cli) is a command-line tool for Home Assistant. Up to 1.0.0 of home-assitant-cli an unrestricted environment was used to handle Jninja2 templates instead of a sandboxed one. The user-supplied input within Jinja2 templates was rendered locally with no restrictions. This gave users access to Python's internals and extended the scope of templating beyond the intended usage. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.0.
CVE-2026-31018
Alta · 8.8
CWE-94 21/04/2026
Code Injection em Dolibarr Dolibarr Erp/crm
In Dolibarr ERP & CRM <= 22.0.4, PHP code detection and editing permission enforcement in the Website module is not applied consistently to all input parameters, allowing an authenticated user restricted to HTML/JavaScript editing to inject PHP code through unprotected inputs during website page creation.
CVE-2026-32613
Crítica · 9.9
CWE-94 20/04/2026
Injeção de expressão SpEL no Echo do Spinnaker leva a execução remota de código
O Spinnaker é uma plataforma de entrega contínua multi-nuvem, de código aberto. O Echo, como alguns outros serviços, usa SpEL (Spring Expression Language) para processar informações, especialmente em torno de artefatos esperados. Nas versões anteriores a 2026.1.0, 2026.0.1, 2025.4.2 e 2025.3.2, diferentemente do orca, ele NÃO restringia esse contexto a um conjunto de classes confiáveis, permitindo acesso COMPLETO à JVM. Isso possibilitava que um usuário utilizasse classes Java arbitrárias que permitem acesso profundo ao sistema. Isso habilitava a capacidade de invocar comandos, acessar arquivos etc. As versões 2026.1.0, 2026.0.1, 2025.4.2 e 2025.3.2 contêm uma correção. Como solução de contorno, desabilite o echo por completo.
CVE-2026-6652
Média · 4.7
CWE-94 20/04/2026
Pagekit CMS StringStorage Template PhpEngine.php evaluate eval injection
A weakness has been identified in Pagekit CMS up to 1.0.18. This issue affects the function evaluate of the file app/modules/view/src/PhpEngine.php of the component StringStorage Template Handler. This manipulation causes improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
CVE-2026-39918
Crítica · 9.8
CWE-94 20/04/2026
Vvveb: injeção de código no endpoint de instalação
O Vvveb anterior à versão 1.0.8.1 contém uma vulnerabilidade de injeção de código no endpoint de instalação, em que o parâmetro POST subdir é gravado sem sanitização no arquivo de configuração env.php, sem escape ou validação. Atacantes podem injetar código PHP arbitrário ao sair do contexto de string na instrução define, para obter execução remota de código não autenticada como o usuário do servidor web.
CVE-2026-5760
Crítica · 9.8
CWE-94 20/04/2026
SGLang: injeção de código via template de chat Jinja2 sem sandbox (CVE-2026-5760)
O endpoint de reranking do SGLang (/v1/rerank) permite Execução Remota de Código (RCE) quando um arquivo de modelo contendo um tokenizer.chat_template malicioso é carregado, pois os templates de chat Jinja2 são renderizados usando um jinja2.Environment() sem sandbox.
CVE-2026-6621
Alta · 7.3
CWE-94 20/04/2026
1024bit extend-deep index.js prototype pollution
A vulnerability was determined in 1024bit extend-deep up to 0.1.6. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file index.js. This manipulation of the argument __proto__ causes improperly controlled modification of object prototype attributes. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The code repository of the project has not been active for many years.
CVE-2026-41282
Alta · 7.5
CWE-94 20/04/2026
Code Injection em Projectdiscovery Nuclei
ProjectDiscovery Nuclei 3 before 3.8.0 allows DSL expression injection. This affects use of -env-vars for multi-step templates against untrusted targets (not the default configuration).
CVE-2026-6594
Alta · 7.3
CWE-94 19/04/2026
brikcss merge prototype pollution
A vulnerability was determined in brikcss merge up to 1.3.0. This affects an unknown part. Executing a manipulation of the argument __proto__/constructor.prototype/prototype can lead to improperly controlled modification of object prototype attributes. The attack may be performed from remote. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
CVE-2026-41242
Crítica · 9.8
CWE-94 18/04/2026
Injeção de código em campos type do protobufjs
O protobufjs compila definições protobuf em funções JavaScript (JS). Nas versões anteriores a 8.0.1 e 7.5.5, atacantes podem injetar código arbitrário nos campos "type" de definições protobuf, que então é executado durante a decodificação de objetos que usam essa definição. As versões 8.0.1 e 7.5.5 corrigem o problema.
CVE-2026-40316
Alta · 8.8
CWE-94 15/04/2026
OWASP BLT has RCE in Github Actions via untrusted Django model execution in workflow
OWASP BLT is a QA testing and vulnerability disclosure platform that encompasses websites, apps, git repositories, and more. Versions prior to 2.1.1 contain an RCE vulnerability in the .github/workflows/regenerate-migrations.yml workflow. The workflow uses the pull_request_target trigger to run with full GITHUB_TOKEN write permissions, copies attacker-controlled files from untrusted pull requests into the trusted runner workspace via git show, and then executes python manage.py makemigrations, which imports Django model modules including attacker-controlled website/models.py at runtime. Any module-level Python code in the attacker's models.py is executed during import, enabling arbitrary code execution in the privileged CI environment with access to GITHUB_TOKEN and repository secrets. The attack is triggerable by any external contributor who can open a pull request, provided a maintainer applies the regenerate-migrations label, potentially leading to secret exfiltration, repository compromise, and supply chain attacks. A patch for this issue is expected to be released in version 2.1.1.
CVE-2026-30993
Crítica · 9.8
CWE-94 15/04/2026
Slah CMS v1.5.0 and below was discovered to contain a remote code execution (RCE)…
Slah CMS v1.5.0 and below was discovered to contain a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in the session() function at config.php. This vulnerability is exploitable via a crafted input.
CVE-2026-39842
Crítica · 9.9
CWE-94 15/04/2026
OpenRemote is Vulnerable to Expression Injection
OpenRemote is an open-source IoT platform. Versions 1.21.0 and below contain two interrelated expression injection vulnerabilities in the rules engine that allow arbitrary code execution on the server. The JavaScript rules engine executes user-supplied scripts via Nashorn's ScriptEngine.eval() without sandboxing, class filtering, or access restrictions, and the authorization check in RulesResourceImpl only restricts Groovy rules to superusers while leaving JavaScript rules unrestricted for any user with the write:rules role. Additionally, the Groovy rules engine has a GroovyDenyAllFilter security filter that is defined but never registered, as the registration code is commented out, rendering the SandboxTransformer ineffective for superuser-created Groovy rules. A non-superuser attacker with the write:rules role can create JavaScript rulesets that execute with full JVM access, enabling remote code execution as root, arbitrary file read, environment variable theft including database credentials, and complete multi-tenant isolation bypass to access data across all realms. This issue has been fixed in version 1.22.0.
CVE-2026-1509
Média · 5.4
CWE-94 15/04/2026
Avada (Fusion) Builder <= 3.15.1 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Limited Arbitrary WordPress Action Execution
The Avada (Fusion) Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary WordPress Action Execution in all versions up to, and including, 3.15.1. This is due to the plugin's `output_action_hook()` function accepting user-controlled input to trigger any registered WordPress action hook without proper authorization checks. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to execute arbitrary WordPress action hooks via the Dynamic Data feature, potentially leading to privilege escalation, file inclusion, denial of service, or other security impacts depending on which action hooks are available in the WordPress installation.