Início / CVEs
Base de CVEs
Vulnerabilidades publicadas, com severidade, exploração conhecida e fontes oficiais.
CVE-2026-82863
Baixa · 3.3
CWE-778 31/08/2026
@hulumi/baseline before 1.3.2 CloudTrail Selector Tampering Detection
@hulumi/baseline versions before 1.3.2 fail to fully detect CloudTrail selector tampering events, reducing audit logging configuration change coverage. Attackers can modify CloudTrail event selectors without complete detection, potentially evading audit trail monitoring.
CVE-2026-82665
Baixa · 3.8
CWE-22 31/08/2026
yaojingang GEOFlow Image Library Cleanup ImageLibraryController.php unlink path traversal
A vulnerability was detected in yaojingang GEOFlow up to 2.1.0. This vulnerability affects the function unlink of the file app/Http/Controllers/Admin/ImageLibraryController.php of the component Image Library Cleanup. The manipulation of the argument file_path results in path traversal. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 2.1.1 is able to resolve this issue. The patch is identified as 67abfd864a15d169a78429f3290c91cb3b93e849. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
CVE-2026-82631
Baixa · 2.2
CWE-119 31/08/2026
valkey-io valkey Blocked-on-keys blocked.c handleClientsBlockedOnKey use after free
A security flaw has been discovered in valkey-io valkey 9.1.0. The affected element is the function handleClientsBlockedOnKey of the file src/blocked.c of the component Blocked-on-keys Subsystem. The manipulation results in use after free. The attack may be performed from remote. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The patch is identified as b2fb0e13f5b4c8c2fb63dcfc2c37a067a0d6d20b. Applying a patch is advised to resolve this issue.
CVE-2026-82622
Baixa · 3.5
CWE-79 31/08/2026
code-projects Employee Leave Managing System Employee Profile Update editaction.php cross site scripting
A security vulnerability has been detected in code-projects Employee Leave Managing System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /EmpManageSys/editaction.php of the component Employee Profile Update. The manipulation of the argument Name leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
CVE-2026-82727
Baixa · 2.3
CWE-209 31/08/2026
AshPhoenix Form.Auto leaks submitted params in an unknown _union_type error message
Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in ash-project ash_phoenix writes the entire raw submitted param map into an exception message, so secrets submitted alongside a union form field leak into logs, crash reports and the dev error page.
When AshPhoenix.Form.Auto builds a union sub-form and the submitted _union_type does not match a configured type, both raise sites built the message with inspect(params, pretty: true), embedding the full untrusted param map, and also inspected the internal union constraints[:types]. Because the message is constructed by the library rather than Phoenix's parameter logger, config :phoenix, :filter_parameters never redacts it. An attacker controls both the trigger and the contents: submitting %{"_union_type" => "nope", "password" => "..."} puts the password verbatim in the raised message. The fix reports only the offending _union_type and the valid type names, dropping the param and constraints dumps.
This issue affects ash_phoenix: from 1.2.17 before 2.3.25.
CVE-2026-82725
Baixa · 2.3
CWE-639 31/08/2026
AshPhoenix FilterForm allows filtering across non-public relationships, disclosing private related data
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in ash-project ash_phoenix lets an attacker who controls filter form parameters filter across relationships the resource author marked non-public, turning the returned rows into a boolean oracle over private related data.
AshPhoenix.FilterForm resolved every relationship hop in the user-supplied path with Ash.Resource.Info.related/2, which traverses private relationships, and only checked the terminal field for publicity. parse_path_and_field/2 also rewrote a field naming a relationship into an extra path segment, so field=some_private_rel was accepted too. Both path and field come straight from form params, and the resulting ref went to Ash.Query.do_filter/2 without the public-only enforcement of Ash.Filter.parse_input/2. The fix resolves each hop with Ash.Resource.Info.public_relationship/2, rejecting the first non-public hop, and requires the terminal field to be public.
This issue affects ash_phoenix: from 0.6.0-rc.1 before 2.3.25.
CVE-2026-82681
Baixa · 2.0
CWE-116 31/08/2026
Query-parameter injection in AshAdmin row-action links via unencoded string primary keys
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output vulnerability in ash-project ash_admin lets an attacker who controls a record's string primary key rewrite the target of AshAdmin's row-action links.
The Table, DataTable, and Show components built row-action URLs by raw string interpolation, splicing the primary key (and table, domain, and resource names) into the query string without URL-encoding. Ash resources routinely use user-settable string primary keys (slugs, emails). Because Plug.Conn.Query resolves duplicate parameters last-wins and primary_key is interpolated last, a stored key such as foo&action_type=destroy injects parameters that override the link, so an admin clicking edit is sent to a destroy form or an arbitrary resource; a # truncates the query into a fragment. The fix builds every link with URI.encode_query/1, encoding all interpolated values.
This issue affects ash_admin: from 0.3.0-rc.0 before 1.3.1.
CVE-2026-81853
Baixa · 2.3
CWE-639 31/08/2026
AshAdmin composite primary key decoding accepts arbitrary fields, enabling a secret-attribute oracle
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in ash-project ash_admin turns a record-lookup URL into an equality oracle over sensitive attributes.
AshAdmin.Helpers.decode_primary_key/2 decodes the composite-primary-key form (Base64 plus ETF) and returns the decoded map verbatim as the lookup filter, without checking that its keys are the resource's primary-key fields. The deserialization guards bound size, block new atoms and funs, and reject nested expressions, but none restricts which fields come back, and :safe still allows any already-interned attribute name. An attacker can therefore encode %{api_token: "guess"} and have it spliced into the lookup filter, brute-forcing a sensitive attribute value (API token, reset token) one equality guess at a time; Map.to_list/1 also accepts structs, yielding a bogus __struct__ key. The fix rejects any decoded key that is not a real primary-key field.
This issue affects ash_admin: from 0.1.0 before 1.3.1.
CVE-2026-81852
Baixa · 2.1
CWE-330 31/08/2026
AshAdmin ships a hardcoded CSP nonce, allowing nonce-based CSP bypass
Use of Insufficiently Random Values vulnerability in ash-project ash_admin ships a hardcoded, publicly known CSP nonce, defeating nonce-based Content-Security-Policy protection.
When mounted without :csp_nonce_assign_key, AshAdmin.Router.ash_admin/2 defaulted the img, style, and script nonces to the literal constant ash_admin-Ed55GFnX, which AshAdmin.Layouts wrote verbatim into the nonce attribute of its inline <style> and <script> tags on every response. The value is a compile-time constant published in the repository and is never rotated per request. If an application's CSP script-src allow-lists that documented default, any HTML-injection sink on an admin page can reuse the known nonce to run inline scripts the policy was meant to block. The fix generates a fresh random nonce per request.
This issue affects ash_admin: from 0.10.8 before 1.3.1.
CVE-2026-82596
Baixa · 3.3
CWE-119 30/08/2026
LatencyUtils PauseDetector LatencyStats.java LatencyStats.recordDetectedPause memory corruption
A vulnerability was determined in LatencyUtils up to 2.0.3. Affected by this issue is the function LatencyStats.recordDetectedPause of the file src/main/java/org/LatencyUtils/LatencyStats.java of the component PauseDetector. Executing a manipulation can lead to memory corruption. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
CVE-2026-82367
Baixa · 2.3
CWE-488 30/08/2026
Re-entrant synchronous publish in AshGraphql subscription batcher delivers one subscriber's records to another's topic
Exposure of Data Element to Wrong Session vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql can deliver one subscription's resolved records to a different subscriber's topic.
AshGraphql.Subscription.Batcher.do_send/5 reads the resolved batch from the process dictionary via Process.get(:batch_resolved) and then unconditionally deletes it. That is sound only inside a task the library owns. On the :backpressure_sync and :noproc fallbacks do_send/5 runs inline in the publishing caller's process, so if a resolver inside an outer do_send/5 triggers another synchronous Ash notification, the inner call finds the outer run's value still under :batch_resolved, adopts it as its own result, and publishes it to the inner topic, a different subscription document with a different actor and tenant. It then deletes the key, so the outer run publishes nothing. The key is not namespaced by run, so records cannot be told apart. The fix saves, clears, and restores :batch_resolved around each run.
This issue affects ash_graphql: from 1.4.0 before 1.11.0.
CVE-2026-81643
Baixa · 2.3
CWE-863 30/08/2026
Broken access control in AshGraphql subscription batcher applies authorization suppression to only the first notification
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql delivers GraphQL subscription payloads for records a subscriber is not authorized to see.
In AshGraphql.Subscription.Batcher, do_send/5 resolves the first notification of a batch and filters it with should_send?/1, which drops results whose errors are coded forbidden or not_found or carry no code, precisely so that unauthorized results are not disclosed. The remaining notifications in the batch are read from the process dictionary, re-run through the pipeline, and appended to the outgoing results without that filter. They reach pubsub.publish_subscription/2, and the not is_nil(record) guard drops only nil records, not error-carrying results. Any two qualifying notifications arriving within the default one-second batch interval suffice, and batching is the default path. The fix applies should_send?/1 to the whole batch.
This issue affects ash_graphql: from 1.4.0 before 1.11.0.
CVE-2026-82555
Baixa · 3.7
CWE-310 30/08/2026
TOTOLINK N600R Authentication cstecgi.cgi loginAuth random values
A vulnerability has been found in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7866_B20220506. This vulnerability affects the function loginAuth of the file /web_cste/cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Authentication Handler. Such manipulation leads to insufficiently random values. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. It is stated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
CVE-2026-81322
Baixa · 2.1
CWE-200 30/08/2026
Cloaked plaintext leaks through a non-sensitive action argument in AshCloak
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in ash-project ash_cloak allows anyone with access to logs, error trackers, or crash reports, or anyone who can trigger a validation error, to recover the plaintext of a field the library encrypts.
AshCloak.Transformers.SetUpEncryption removes each cloaked attribute from the action's accept list and adds an action argument that carries the plaintext into the encryption change. That argument is built with sensitive?: attr.sensitive?, inheriting the flag from the source attribute, so a cloaked attribute declared without sensitive? true produces a non-sensitive argument. It is the only place the cleartext value lives, and the one place Ash will not redact: it appears verbatim in inspect(changeset), Ash.Error.Invalid and validation error messages, telemetry, :sys dumps, and error-tracker payloads. The generated encrypted attribute and decrypt calculation are already hardcoded sensitive.
This issue affects ash_cloak: from 0.1.0 before 0.4.0.
CVE-2026-82656
Baixa · 2.6
CWE-22 30/08/2026
Admidio before 5.0.12 Path Traversal via Photo ZIP Download
Admidio before 5.0.12 fails to sanitize album names in the photo ZIP download functionality, allowing authenticated users with album-creation rights to include path traversal segments in archive entry names. Attackers can craft malicious album names containing directory traversal sequences that escape the intended directory when recipients extract the archive, potentially writing files outside the target directory.
CVE-2026-81318
Baixa · 2.1
CWE-863 30/08/2026
Distinct-query aggregate drops the tenant schema prefix, leaking across tenants in AshSql
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a caller in a schema-based multitenant application to receive aggregate values computed from another tenant's rows.
When an aggregate is computed over a distinct query, AshSql.AggregateQuery.add_single_aggs/5 rebuilds the outer query from query.from.source alone, which is only the {table, schema} tuple and does not carry query.prefix or query.from.prefix. For strategy(:context) multitenancy those hold the tenant schema, so the rebuilt outer query reads the repo's default schema while the inner correlated subquery still reads the tenant schema, and the two are joined only on primary key. The aggregate, and any relationship join added off the prefix-less binding, is then computed against the wrong tenant's rows. The neighbouring limit and exists branches instead wrap the query with subquery/1, which preserves the prefix.
This issue affects ash_sql: from 0.1.0 before 0.7.1.
CVE-2026-81316
Baixa · 2.1
CWE-863 30/08/2026
Same-named aggregates with differing filters are conflated in AshSql
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a caller to receive an aggregate value computed over rows a more restrictive filter should have excluded, disclosing counts, sums, or lists across an authorization or tenancy boundary.
AshSql.Aggregate.different_queries?/2 reports two aggregate queries as different only when their filter and their sort both differ. Aggregate queries rarely carry a sort, so two aggregates that share a name but carry entirely different filters compare as identical. The colliding aggregate keeps its name and is treated as already computed, and select_aggregates returns the first-registered variant's value. The same name reaches the builder twice with different filters when actor or tenant context is stamped into each aggregate's query, so a narrowly filtered aggregate can be served the value of a previously registered broad one.
This issue affects ash_sql: from 0.1.0 before 0.7.1.
CVE-2026-80227
Baixa · 2.1
CWE-697 30/08/2026
SQL string_trim removes only spaces, diverging from in-memory trimming in AshSql
Incorrect Comparison vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a user to pad a string field with tab, newline, carriage-return, or form-feed characters and pass a trimmed uniqueness or equality check in the database that the same expression would fail in memory (or the reverse).
string_trim/1 compiles to REGEXP_REPLACE patterns built from an Elixir string in which \s is the escape for a single space (codepoint 32), not a regex whitespace class. The generated SQL therefore removes only literal spaces and leaves tabs, newlines, carriage returns, and form feeds in place, whereas String.trim/1 in Elixir removes them all. Any Ash filter, validation, or identity that relies on string_trim/1 then behaves differently depending on whether Ash pushes the expression down to SQL or evaluates it in memory, so padded input can register a near-duplicate value or slip past a trimmed comparison.
This issue affects ash_sql: from 0.1.0 before 0.7.1.
CVE-2026-78691
Baixa · 2.1
CWE-943 30/08/2026
Unescaped backslash allows LIKE wildcard injection in AshSql string search
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a user who supplies a search term to contains/2, string_starts_with/2, or string_ends_with/2 to inject live SQL LIKE wildcards, turning a literal substring search into an attacker-controlled pattern match.
The escape helpers in AshSql.Expr prefix % and _ with a backslash but never escape a backslash already present in the input. Because backslash is the default LIKE escape character, the escaping defeats itself: the input \% becomes the pattern fragment \\%, where \\ is a literal backslash and the attacker's % remains a live wildcard. The search value stays parameterized, so this is confined to the LIKE pattern grammar rather than full SQL. An attacker can widen matches to probe values, slip past a negated contains(...) guard, or crash the query with a trailing lone backslash.
This issue affects ash_sql: from 0.1.1-rc.10 before 0.7.1.
CVE-2026-82488
Baixa · 3.5
CWE-79 30/08/2026
Beetel 450TC3 User Management cross site scripting
A vulnerability was identified in Beetel 450TC3 01.00.00_01. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component User Management. The manipulation of the argument Username leads to cross site scripting. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
CVE-2026-82483
Baixa · 3.5
CWE-79 30/08/2026
coppermine-gallery Coppermine Photo Gallery Hidden Album Update Endpoint db_input.php cross site scripting
A vulnerability was detected in coppermine-gallery Coppermine Photo Gallery up to 1.6.28. This impacts an unknown function of the file db_input.php of the component Hidden Album Update Endpoint. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.6.29 will fix this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
CVE-2026-82482
Baixa · 3.5
CWE-79 30/08/2026
coppermine-gallery Coppermine Photo Gallery edit_profile Endpoint profile.php cross site scripting
A security vulnerability has been detected in coppermine-gallery Coppermine Photo Gallery up to 1.6.28. This affects an unknown function of the file profile.php of the component edit_profile Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument Biography leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.6.29 mitigates this issue. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
CVE-2026-78364
Baixa · 3.5
CWE-79 30/08/2026
MW WP Form < 5.1.6 - Editor+ Stored XSS via Inquiry Data List
The MW WP Form WordPress plugin before 5.1.6 does not sanitise and escape some of its form settings before outputting them back in an admin dashboard page, which could allow users with a role as low as Editor to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks against high privilege users such as admin.
CVE-2026-77846
Baixa · 2.1
CWE-943 30/08/2026
JSON path injection via unescaped get_path segments in AshSqlite
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic vulnerability in ash-project ash_sqlite allows an attacker who controls a get_path/2 segment to traverse into nested JSON the application never exposed, disclosing private or sensitive? embedded fields.
AshSqlite.SqlImplementation builds the SQLite json_extract path with "$." <> Enum.join(right, "."), so a single segment containing ., [, ], or $ re-interprets the JSON path (for example "private.secret" descends two levels instead of naming one key). The path is bound as a parameter, so this is confined to the JSON-path grammar rather than SQL. Any endpoint that lets user input reach a get_path segment (a common pick-a-field pattern) can read nested values it never meant to expose.
This issue affects ash_sqlite: from 0.1.2-rc.0 before 0.2.18.
CVE-2026-82562
Baixa · 3.7
CWE-770 29/08/2026
qs.parse does not enforce arrayLimit on comma groups under bracket-push keys when throwOnLimitExceeded is set (incomplete fix for CVE-2026-2391)
### Summary
When `qs.parse` is called with `comma: true` and `throwOnLimitExceeded: true`, a comma-separated value under a bracket-push key (`a[]=1,2,3,4`) is split into an array without being compared against `arrayLimit`, while the same value under a flat key (`a=1,2,3,4`), an indexed key (`a[0]=`), a nested key (`a[b]=`), or a dotted key (`a.b=` with `allowDots`) throws the documented `RangeError`. A single parameter such as `a[]=1,2,2,...` therefore produces an inner array of arbitrary length even though the caller opted into the hard limit. This is the `[]=` key form that the fix for CVE-2026-2391 (qs 6.14.2) did not cover.
### Details
In `lib/parse.js`, a comma-separated value under a `[]=` key is split and then wrapped as a single nested element (`val = [val]`, so that each `a[]=x,y` group counts as one element of the outer array). The `arrayLimit` check that 6.14.2 added for comma values runs after that wrap, so for `[]=` parts it only ever saw the wrapper of length 1. 6.15.3 added a pre-split comma count so that an oversized value throws before it is allocated, but gated it on an `isFlatArrayValue` flag that `parseValues` set to `false` for any part containing `[]=`, and did not pass it for object-valued input, so the gap remained.
#### PoC
```js
var qs = require('qs');
var options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 3, throwOnLimitExceeded: true };
qs.parse('a=1,2,3,4', options); // RangeError: Array limit exceeded. Only 3 elements allowed in an array.
qs.parse('a[]=1,2,3,4', options); // { a: [ [ '1', '2', '3', '4' ] ] } (no throw)
qs.parse('a[]=' + '1,'.repeat(1000000) + '1', { comma: true, arrayLimit: 20, throwOnLimitExceeded: true });
// no throw; a 1,000,001-element inner array is allocated
```
#### Fix
`lib/parse.js`, applied in 8859c37 on `main` and released as v6.16.0: the `isFlatArrayValue` gate is removed, so every comma-split value is counted against `arrayLimit` before splitting regardless of key form. An in-limit group under `a[]=` still counts as one element of the outer array, and the default (`throwOnLimitExceeded: false`) path is unchanged.
### Affected versions
`>=6.14.2 <6.16.0`, fixed in v6.16.0.
v6.14.2 introduced `arrayLimit` enforcement for comma values (the fix for CVE-2026-2391) but only for values not under a `[]=` key, and every release from v6.14.2 through v6.15.3 has the same gap. v6.14.0 and v6.14.1, where `throwOnLimitExceeded` exists but does not apply to any comma form, are covered by CVE-2026-2391 rather than this record. Earlier lines (6.7.x through 6.13.x) have `comma` but no `throwOnLimitExceeded`, so there is no hard cap on any comma path to bypass; releases before 6.7.0 have no `comma` option.
### Impact
An unauthenticated attacker who can reach an application that parses untrusted query strings or urlencoded bodies with both `comma: true` and `throwOnLimitExceeded: true` (both non-default) can bypass the configured limit with a single `a[]=` parameter and force the parser to allocate an array proportional to the request size. The cost is strictly linear in the attacker-supplied bytes (about 0.1 microseconds and 6 to 7 retained bytes per input byte; the same out-of-memory threshold as the documented default `throwOnLimitExceeded: false` path), so a transport-layer request or body size limit bounds it completely (and node's default maximum HTTP header size of 16 KB already bounds the request line, so multi-megabyte payloads need a body parser). The impact is that an opt-in hard limit fails open on one key spelling, not unbounded allocation from a small input.