Vulnerabilidades do Oracle Essbase
🔔 Criar alerta RSS Verificador de versão
CVEs publicadas que afetam Oracle Essbase: 12 registro(s), com versões afetadas e correções.cpe:2.3:a:oracle:essbase
CVE-2025-61763
Alta · 8.1
CWE-284 21/10/2025
Improper Access Control em Oracle Essbase
Vulnerability in Oracle Essbase (component: Essbase Web Platform). The supported version that is affected is 21.7.3.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Essbase. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Essbase accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Essbase accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).
CVE-2021-3711
Crítica · 9.8
CWE-120 24/08/2021
Estouro de buffer na decriptação SM2 do OpenSSL
Para decriptar dados cifrados com SM2, uma aplicação deve chamar a função de API EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Normalmente, uma aplicação chama essa função duas vezes. Na primeira vez, na entrada, o parâmetro "out" pode ser NULL e, na saída, o parâmetro "outlen" é preenchido com o tamanho do buffer necessário para armazenar o texto simples decriptado. A aplicação pode então alocar um buffer de tamanho suficiente e chamar EVP_PKEY_decrypt() novamente, mas desta vez passando um valor não NULL para o parâmetro "out". Um erro na implementação do código de decriptação SM2 faz com que o cálculo do tamanho do buffer necessário para armazenar o texto simples retornado pela primeira chamada a EVP_PKEY_decrypt() possa ser menor do que o tamanho real exigido pela segunda chamada. Isso pode levar a um estouro de buffer quando EVP_PKEY_decrypt() é chamada pela aplicação uma segunda vez com um buffer pequeno demais. Um atacante malicioso capaz de apresentar conteúdo SM2 para decriptação a uma aplicação poderia fazer com que dados escolhidos pelo atacante estourem o buffer em até no máximo 62 bytes, alterando o conteúdo de outros dados armazenados após o buffer, possivelmente mudando o comportamento da aplicação ou causando travamento. A localização do buffer depende da aplicação, mas normalmente é alocada na heap. Corrigido no OpenSSL 1.1.1l (afetadas 1.1.1-1.1.1k).
CVE-2021-22898
Baixa · 3.1
CWE-909 11/06/2021
curl 7.7 through 7.76.1 suffers from an information disclosure when the `-t` command line option,...
curl 7.7 through 7.76.1 suffers from an information disclosure when the `-t` command line option, known as `CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS` in libcurl, is used to send variable=content pairs to TELNET servers. Due to a flaw in the option parser for sending NEW_ENV variables, libcurl could be made to pass on uninitialized data from a stack based buffer to the server, resulting in potentially revealing sensitive internal information to the server using a clear-text network protocol.
CVE-2021-22901
Alta · 8.1
CWE-416 11/06/2021
curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed...
curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when a TLS 1.3 session ticket arrives over a connection. A malicious server can use this in rare unfortunate circumstances to potentially reach remote code execution in the client. When libcurl at run-time sets up support for TLS 1.3 session tickets on a connection using OpenSSL, it stores pointers to the transfer in-memory object for later retrieval when a session ticket arrives. If the connection is used by multiple transfers (like with a reused HTTP/1.1 connection or multiplexed HTTP/2 connection) that first transfer object might be freed before the new session is established on that connection and then the function will access a memory buffer that might be freed. When using that memory, libcurl might even call a function pointer in the object, making it possible for a remote code execution if the server could somehow manage to get crafted memory content into the correct place in memory.
CVE-2021-22897
Média · 5.3
CWE-668 11/06/2021
curl 7.61.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from exposure of data element to wrong session due to a...
curl 7.61.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from exposure of data element to wrong session due to a mistake in the code for CURLOPT_SSL_CIPHER_LIST when libcurl is built to use the Schannel TLS library. The selected cipher set was stored in a single "static" variable in the library, which has the surprising side-effect that if an application sets up multiple concurrent transfers, the last one that sets the ciphers will accidentally control the set used by all transfers. In a worst-case scenario, this weakens transport security significantly.
CVE-2021-22890
Baixa · 3.7
CWE-290 01/04/2021
curl 7.63.0 to and including 7.75.0 includes vulnerability that allows a malicious HTTPS proxy to...
curl 7.63.0 to and including 7.75.0 includes vulnerability that allows a malicious HTTPS proxy to MITM a connection due to bad handling of TLS 1.3 session tickets. When using a HTTPS proxy and TLS 1.3, libcurl can confuse session tickets arriving from the HTTPS proxy but work as if they arrived from the remote server and then wrongly "short-cut" the host handshake. When confusing the tickets, a HTTPS proxy can trick libcurl to use the wrong session ticket resume for the host and thereby circumvent the server TLS certificate check and make a MITM attack to be possible to perform unnoticed. Note that such a malicious HTTPS proxy needs to provide a certificate that curl will accept for the MITMed server for an attack to work - unless curl has been told to ignore the server certificate check.
CVE-2021-22876
Média · 5.3
CWE-200 01/04/2021
curl 7.1.1 to and including 7.75.0 is vulnerable to an "Exposure of Private Personal Information...
curl 7.1.1 to and including 7.75.0 is vulnerable to an "Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor" by leaking credentials in the HTTP Referer: header. libcurl does not strip off user credentials from the URL when automatically populating the Referer: HTTP request header field in outgoing HTTP requests, and therefore risks leaking sensitive data to the server that is the target of the second HTTP request.
CVE-2021-3449
Média · 5.9
CWE-476 25/03/2021
NULL pointer deref in signature_algorithms processing
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).
CVE-2020-8286
Alta · 7.5
CWE-295 14/12/2020
curl 7.41.0 through 7.73.0 is vulnerable to an improper check for certificate revocation due to...
curl 7.41.0 through 7.73.0 is vulnerable to an improper check for certificate revocation due to insufficient verification of the OCSP response.
CVE-2020-8285
Alta · 7.5
CWE-674 14/12/2020
curl 7.21.0 to and including 7.73.0 is vulnerable to uncontrolled recursion due to a stack...
curl 7.21.0 to and including 7.73.0 is vulnerable to uncontrolled recursion due to a stack overflow issue in FTP wildcard match parsing.
CVE-2020-8284
Baixa · 3.7
CWE-200 14/12/2020
A malicious server can use the FTP PASV response to trick curl 7.73.0 and earlier into connecting...
A malicious server can use the FTP PASV response to trick curl 7.73.0 and earlier into connecting back to a given IP address and port, and this way potentially make curl extract information about services that are otherwise private and not disclosed, for example doing port scanning and service banner extractions.
CVE-2019-10219
Média · 6.1
CWE-79 08/11/2019
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) em Red Hat Hibernate Validator
A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack.