Vulnerabilidades de Getgrav

Grav before 2.1.7 contains an information disclosure vulnerability because bundled nginx, lighttpd, IIS, and Caddy 2 configurations block .git only at document root. Unauthenticated attackers can request nested repositories such as user/.git to retrieve Git config, refs, and objects, reconstructing unpublished history or committed secrets.

Grav from 2.0.22 before 2.1.7 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the Clockwork profiler that trusts loopback REMOTE_ADDR values. Unauthenticated attackers behind a same-host HTTP proxy can read profiler records exposing system and plugin configuration, secrets, request metadata, and queries.

Grav grav-plugin-api before 1.0.36 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows delegated user managers to obtain super-admin access by storing positive scalar admin or api parent grants. Attackers with api.users.write can edit account access maps or invitations so the inheriting permission resolver satisfies requireSuper checks, accessing super-only API endpoints.

Grav Login plugin 1.2.0 before 3.9.9 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows publishers to obtain password-reset tokens by authoring a page at the reset route. When a victim opens an emailed reset link, the publisher-controlled page rendered by Login::getPage() exposes the username and bearer token, enabling takeover of more privileged accounts.

Grav Login plugin 2.7.0 before 3.9.9 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows attackers with a valid password to skip two-factor authentication through remember-me cookie restoration. Attackers can obtain a persistent remember-me cookie after the password step and restore it as a fully authorized session without completing the second factor.

Grav Login plugin 2.7.0 before 3.9.9 contains an authentication bypass in processUserProfile(), which checks that the session user exists but not that a pending front-end 2FA session is fully authorized. Attackers with a victim's password who can publish a page form without an access rule can invoke update_user before completing 2FA to disable twofa_enabled and take over the account.

Grav before 2.0.16 contains an incomplete default denylist in the Twig sandbox configuration that fails to block access to system configuration secrets. Attackers with page-edit permission can use config.get() or config.toArray() in Twig templates to retrieve sensitive values like system.cache.redis.password when config_access is enabled.

The Grav Email plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-email) before 4.2.2 renders page-editor-controlled Email action parameters as unsandboxed Twig templates. An authenticated remote user with only api.access and api.pages.write permissions can place a Twig expression in header.form.process.email.body, publish the page, and submit the form to execute an arbitrary operating-system command as the account running PHP.

The getgrav/grav-plugin-login Composer plugin before 3.9.1 (used by Grav) compares password reset and account activation tokens using a non-constant-time === string comparison instead of hash_equals() in classes/Controller.php (taskReset()) and login.php (activation handler). Because the token-submission endpoint (taskReset) also lacks rate limiting, an attacker could in principle send repeated token guesses against a known username and use the timing differences to attempt to recover a valid token, though the vendor rates the practical exploitability as low and no end-to-end network exploit has been demonstrated.