Vulnerabilidades de Tenable
CVEs publicadas que afetam produtos de Tenable: 60 registro(s), com severidade, exploração e correções.
Security Center 20Nessus 19Tenable.sc 8Nessus Agent 6Log Correlation Engine 4Nessus Network Monitor 3Terrascan 3Agent 2Operational Technology Exposure 1Identity Exposure 1Tenable Nessus, Tenable Nessus Agent 1Tenable Identity Exposure (SaaS) 1Tenable Operation Technology 1Sensor Proxy 1
CVE-2026-47356
Alta · 8.6
CWE-918 19/05/2026
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) em Tenable Terrascan
Terrascan v1.18.3 and prior are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the webhook_url parameter in the file scan endpoint (POST /v1/{iac}/{iacVersion}/{cloud}/local/file/scan) when running in server mode. An unauthenticated remote attacker can supply an arbitrary URL as the webhook_url multipart form parameter. After scanning the uploaded file, Terrascan sends an HTTP POST request to the attacker-controlled URL containing the full scan results as a JSON body, with the attacker-supplied webhook_token forwarded as a Bearer token in the Authorization header. The retryable HTTP client retries up to 10 times on failure. This affects deployments running terrascan in server mode (terrascan server), which binds to 0.0.0.0 with no authentication. Note: Terrascan was archived in August 2023 and no patch will be released.
CVE-2026-33694
Alta · 7.8
CWE-59 23/04/2026
Junction File Manipulation
This vulnerability allows an attacker to create a junction, enabling the deletion of arbitrary files with SYSTEM privileges. As a result, this condition potentially facilitates arbitrary code execution, whereby an attacker may exploit the vulnerability to execute malicious code with elevated SYSTEM privileges.
CVE-2026-4433
Média · 4.3
CWE-16 24/03/2026
An SSH misconfigurations exists in Tenable OT that led to the potential exfiltration of…
An SSH misconfigurations exists in Tenable OT that led to the potential exfiltration of socket, port, and service information via the ostunnel user and GatewayPorts. This could be used to potentially glean information about the underlying system and give an attacker information that could be used to attempt to compromise the host.
CVE-2026-2698
Média · 6.5
CWE-639 23/02/2026
Improper Access Control
An improper access control vulnerability exists where an authenticated user could access areas outside of their authorized scope.
CVE-2026-2697
Alta · 8.8
CWE-639 23/02/2026
Indirect Object Reference (IDOR) in Security Center
An Indirect Object Reference (IDOR) in Security Center allows an authenticated remote attacker to escalate privileges via the 'owner' parameter.
CVE-2026-2630
Alta · 8.8
CWE-78 17/02/2026
[R1] Stand-alone Security Patches Available for Tenable Security Center versions 6.5.1, 6.6.0 and 6.7.2: SC-202602.1 + SC-202602.2
A Command Injection vulnerability exists where an authenticated, remote attacker could execute arbitrary code on the underlying server where Tenable Security Center is hosted.
CVE-2026-2026
Média · 6.1
CWE-276 13/02/2026
Improper Access Control Allows Denial of Service
A vulnerability has been identified where weak file permissions in the Nessus Agent directory on Windows hosts could allow unauthorized access, potentially permitting Denial of Service (DoS) attacks.
CVE-2025-36640
Alta · 8.8
CWE-269 13/01/2026
Local Privilege Escalation
A vulnerability has been identified in the installation/uninstallation of the Nessus Agent Tray App on Windows Hosts which could lead to escalation of privileges.
CVE-2025-36636
Média · 4.3
CWE-284 08/10/2025
Improper Access Control
In Tenable Security Center versions prior to 6.7.0, an improper access control vulnerability exists where an authenticated user could access areas outside of their authorized scope.
CVE-2022-0778
Alta · 7.5
CWE-835 15/03/2022
Infinite loop in BN_mod_sqrt() reachable when parsing certificates
The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that contain elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit elliptic curve parameters with a base point encoded in compressed form. It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a certificate that has invalid explicit curve parameters. Since certificate parsing happens prior to verification of the certificate signature, any process that parses an externally supplied certificate may thus be subject to a denial of service attack. The infinite loop can also be reached when parsing crafted private keys as they can contain explicit elliptic curve parameters. Thus vulnerable situations include: - TLS clients consuming server certificates - TLS servers consuming client certificates - Hosting providers taking certificates or private keys from customers - Certificate authorities parsing certification requests from subscribers - Anything else which parses ASN.1 elliptic curve parameters Also any other applications that use the BN_mod_sqrt() where the attacker can control the parameter values are vulnerable to this DoS issue. In the OpenSSL 1.0.2 version the public key is not parsed during initial parsing of the certificate which makes it slightly harder to trigger the infinite loop. However any operation which requires the public key from the certificate will trigger the infinite loop. In particular the attacker can use a self-signed certificate to trigger the loop during verification of the certificate signature. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1n and 3.0.2 on the 15th March 2022. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.2 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1n (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1m). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zd (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zc).
CVE-2022-23990
Alta · 7.5
CWE-190 26/01/2022
Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.4 has an integer overflow in the doProlog function.
Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.4 has an integer overflow in the doProlog function.
CVE-2022-23852
Crítica · 9.8
CWE-190 23/01/2022
Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.4 has a signed integer overflow in XML_GetBuffer, for...
Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.4 has a signed integer overflow in XML_GetBuffer, for configurations with a nonzero XML_CONTEXT_BYTES.
CVE-2022-22827
Alta · 8.8
CWE-190 10/01/2022
storeAtts in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
storeAtts in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
CVE-2022-22826
Alta · 8.8
CWE-190 10/01/2022
nextScaffoldPart in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
nextScaffoldPart in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
CVE-2022-22825
Alta · 8.8
CWE-190 10/01/2022
lookup in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
lookup in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
CVE-2022-22824
Crítica · 9.8
CWE-190 10/01/2022
defineAttribute in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
defineAttribute in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
CVE-2022-22823
Crítica · 9.8
CWE-190 10/01/2022
build_model in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
build_model in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
CVE-2022-22822
Crítica · 9.8
CWE-190 10/01/2022
addBinding in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
addBinding in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
CVE-2021-46143
Alta · 7.8
CWE-190 06/01/2022
In doProlog in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3, an integer overflow exists for...
In doProlog in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3, an integer overflow exists for m_groupSize.
CVE-2021-45960
Alta · 8.8
CWE-682 01/01/2022
In Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3, a left shift by 29 (or more) places in the storeAtts...
In Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3, a left shift by 29 (or more) places in the storeAtts function in xmlparse.c can lead to realloc misbehavior (e.g., allocating too few bytes, or only freeing memory).
CVE-2021-40438
Crítica · 9.0
KEV Urgente · 83 Exploit público Ransomware CWE-918 16/09/2021
Apache HTTP Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier.
CVE-2021-3711
Crítica · 9.8
CWE-120 24/08/2021
Estouro de buffer na decriptação SM2 do OpenSSL
Para decriptar dados cifrados com SM2, uma aplicação deve chamar a função de API EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Normalmente, uma aplicação chama essa função duas vezes. Na primeira vez, na entrada, o parâmetro "out" pode ser NULL e, na saída, o parâmetro "outlen" é preenchido com o tamanho do buffer necessário para armazenar o texto simples decriptado. A aplicação pode então alocar um buffer de tamanho suficiente e chamar EVP_PKEY_decrypt() novamente, mas desta vez passando um valor não NULL para o parâmetro "out". Um erro na implementação do código de decriptação SM2 faz com que o cálculo do tamanho do buffer necessário para armazenar o texto simples retornado pela primeira chamada a EVP_PKEY_decrypt() possa ser menor do que o tamanho real exigido pela segunda chamada. Isso pode levar a um estouro de buffer quando EVP_PKEY_decrypt() é chamada pela aplicação uma segunda vez com um buffer pequeno demais. Um atacante malicioso capaz de apresentar conteúdo SM2 para decriptação a uma aplicação poderia fazer com que dados escolhidos pelo atacante estourem o buffer em até no máximo 62 bytes, alterando o conteúdo de outros dados armazenados após o buffer, possivelmente mudando o comportamento da aplicação ou causando travamento. A localização do buffer depende da aplicação, mas normalmente é alocada na heap. Corrigido no OpenSSL 1.1.1l (afetadas 1.1.1-1.1.1k).
CVE-2021-3450
Alta · 7.4
CWE-295 25/03/2021
CA certificate check bypass with X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT
The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).
CVE-2021-3449
Média · 5.9
CWE-476 25/03/2021
NULL pointer deref in signature_algorithms processing
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).
CVE-2020-11023
Média · 6.1
KEV Alta · 67 Exploit público CWE-79 29/04/2020
JQuery Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability
In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.0.3 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0.