Início / CVEs
Base de CVEs
Vulnerabilidades publicadas, com severidade, exploração conhecida e fontes oficiais.
CVE-2026-104645
Baixa · 2.7
CWE-639 08/10/2026
Image Photo Gallery Final Tiles Grid < 3.6.14 - Contributor+ Arbitrary Gallery Cloning, Image Modification and Post Meta Update via IDOR
The Image Photo Gallery Final Tiles Grid WordPress plugin before 3.6.14 does not properly verify authorization on several of its gallery and image management actions, checking ownership against a different object than the one being acted on, or omitting the check entirely, allowing any authenticated user with contributor-level access or above to clone, modify and reorder galleries and images belonging to other users and to write Image Photo Gallery Final Tiles Grid WordPress plugin before 3.6.14 metadata onto arbitrary posts they do not own.
CVE-2026-107445
Média · 5.4
CWE-639 08/10/2026
Rubygem-katello: katello: katello: katello flatpak remote repositories api cross-organization authorization bypass
A flaw was found in Katello where the Flatpak Remote Repositories API does not properly enforce authorization when accessing a flatpak remote repository by identifier. An authenticated user with permission to view flatpak remotes in one organization may be able to access flatpak remote repository information belonging to another organization. The same unscoped lookup is used by the mirror action, which may allow creating a repository in a product the user can edit that is configured with another organization's flatpak remote URL and stored remote credentials.
CVE-2026-107444
Média · 4.3
CWE-639 08/10/2026
Rubygem-katello: katello: katello: katello docker tags repositories api cross-organization authorization bypass
A flaw was found in Katello where the Docker Tags repositories API does not properly enforce organization scoping when listing repositories for a Docker meta tag. An authenticated user with permission to view products in one organization may be able to retrieve repository metadata associated with Docker tags belonging to another organization by supplying the tag identifier. This can result in unauthorized disclosure of repository configuration information across organization boundaries.
CVE-2026-17538
Média · 5.4
CWE-639 07/10/2026
Appointment Booking Plugin – LatePoint | Calendar & Scheduling for WordPress <= 5.6.9 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Insecure Direct Object Reference to Arbitrary Customer PII Modification
The LatePoint - Appointment Booking & Reservation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to, and including, 5.6.9. This is due to the process_step_customer() function using is_user_logged_in() as the sole gate before merging POSTed customer data into an existing LatePoint customer, without any ownership checks. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify the personal information (first name, last name, email, phone, notes) of arbitrary LatePoint customers, and, when the contact_merge setting is 'phone', to overwrite the victim's email address and take over the account via a password reset.
CVE-2026-76278
Média · 4.3
CWE-639 07/10/2026
Authorization Bypass in SPL2 Module Permissions in Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.3, 10.2.7, and 10.0.10, a user that holds a role with the edit_spl2_module_permissions capability could use the affected Representational State Transfer (REST) API to access permission grants for SPL2 modules that the user does not have permission to view. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Enterprise does not verify that the user can read the requested app before the affected REST API returns SPL2 module permission grants. For more information see Module permissions (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/spl2-search-manual/modules-statements-and-views/module-permissions) and Manage SPL2 modules (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/spl2-search-manual/multiple-searches-in-an-spl2-module/manage-spl2-modules) in the Splunk documentation.
Splunk Enterprise versions 9.4.x are not affected.
CVE-2026-76269
Média · 6.5
CWE-639 07/10/2026
Improper Access Control in Search Job Retrieval through the REST API in Splunk Enterprise
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.3, 10.2.7, 10.0.10, and 9.4.15, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could use a user-controlled job identifier to access substantially all search job information from jobs that belong to other users, including search query text, job metadata, results, and preview results, through an Application Programming Interface (API) implemented as a Representational State Transfer (REST) API. The vulnerability is possible because the REST API does not fully validate job ownership before returning search job information.
CVE-2026-107270
Alta · 7.1
CWE-639 07/10/2026
Gophish through 0.12.1 Object Takeover via Client-Supplied ID on API Create Endpoints
Gophish through 0.12.1 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that allows authenticated users to take over other users' groups, templates, landing pages and sending profiles. Attackers can supply another user's sequential id in POST requests to /api/groups/, /api/templates/, /api/pages/ or /api/smtp/ to overwrite and reassign objects, locking out owners and exposing victims' recipient lists.
CVE-2026-46438
Média · 6.5
CWE-639 07/10/2026
wger: Cross-User Data Corruption via Missing Ownership Check on WorkoutLog.slot_entry
wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. Prior to version 2.6, an authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary workout log entries into any other user's `SlotEntry` by supplying the victim's `slot_entry` ID in a `POST /api/v2/workoutlog/` request. The `slot_entry` foreign key is not included in the ownership verification performed by `WorkoutLogViewSet.get_owner_objects()`, so the server accepts and persists the cross-user reference without error. Because `SlotEntry.get_config_data()` retrieves associated logs via `self.workoutlog_set.all()` with no user filter, the attacker's injected data is silently folded into the victim's progressive-overload calculations, corrupting their auto-generated weight and repetition targets. Version 2.6 contains a patch.
CVE-2026-104651
Média · 4.3
CWE-639 07/10/2026
Yaad Sarig Payment Gateway For WC < 2.2.13 - Subscriber+ Arbitrary Order Payment Manipulation via IDOR
The Yaad Sarig Payment Gateway For WC WordPress plugin before 2.2.13 does not verify authorization or that the requesting user owns the target order in several of its order payment-processing actions, allowing any authenticated user, including subscribers, to act on and alter orders belonging to other customers.
CVE-2026-104050
Média · 4.3
CWE-639 07/10/2026
Academy LMS < 4.0.0 - Subscriber+ Cross-Course Quiz Answer Disclosure via render_quiz_answers
The Academy LMS WordPress plugin before 4.0.0 does not verify that a quiz question belongs to the course the requesting user is authorized to access before returning that question's answer options, allowing any authenticated user with access to a single course, such as an enrolled student, to read the quiz answer options of questions belonging to other courses they are not enrolled in.
CVE-2026-104049
Média · 4.3
CWE-639 07/10/2026
Academy LMS < 4.0.0 - Subscriber+ Arbitrary Lesson Content Disclosure via Topic REST Endpoint
The Academy LMS WordPress plugin before 4.0.0 does not verify course enrollment or object ownership when returning a lesson's content through one of its REST API routes, allowing users with a self-registerable student account to read the full content of arbitrary lessons, including lessons of paid or private courses they are not enrolled in.
CVE-2026-93678
Alta · 7.6
CWE-639 06/10/2026
Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper authorization.
CVE-2026-105268
Média · 4.3
CWE-639 06/10/2026
Gitea issue attachment API allows changing comment attachments
The Gitea API routes for issue attachments (`/api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/assets/{attachment_id}`) also accepted attachments that belong to comments on the issue. Because the author of an issue may edit and delete the issue's attachments, a user who opened an issue could rename or delete attachments that other users had posted in comments on that issue. The contents of the attachments could not be changed.
CVE-2026-105811
Média · 6.5
CWE-639 06/10/2026
Authorization bypass through a user-controlled key in the Amazon Q Business Lambda hook sample in QnABot on AWS
Authorization bypass through a user-controlled key in the optional Amazon Q Business Lambda hook sample ( q-business-lambda-hook https://github.com/aws-solutions-library-samples/qnabot-on-aws/blob/main/source/docs/lambda_hooks/README.md ), available with QnABot on AWS versions 7.0.0 through 7.4.5, might allow an authenticated remote user to read arbitrary Amazon S3 objects in the deploying AWS account. This sample solution provides an example Lambda hook and requires separate, manual deployment and additional setup. It is not deployed automatically with QnABot. Customers who have not deployed this optional sample hook are not affected and do not need to take action.
To remediate this issue, affected customers should update the QnABot on AWS stack to version 7.4.6 or later and then redeploy the Amazon Q Business Lambda hook sample stack. Updating the QnABot on AWS stack alone does not deliver the fix.
CVE-2026-103009
Alta · 7.1
CWE-639 06/10/2026
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in Elasticsearch Leading to Information Disclosure
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Elasticsearch can lead to Information Disclosure via a specially crafted cross-cluster search request that references an unauthorized shard identifier. Elasticsearch contains an authorization bypass weakness in its handling of cross-cluster search requests made through the Remote Cluster Security (RCS) 2.0 model. An authorization check validates a request against one identifying attribute of the target shard, while a separate, independently-supplied identifying attribute in the same request determines which shard is actually accessed. A holder of a cross-cluster API key authorized for one index can craft a request whose two identifying attributes refer to different indices, causing the request to be authorized against an index they can access while actually operating against a different, unauthorized index. This can expose that index's document contents, field mappings, and other metadata, and in limited cases allows modification of retention-lease state on the unauthorized index.
CVE-2026-102406
Alta · 8.8
CWE-639 06/10/2026
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in Kibana Leading to Cross-Tenant Data Interception
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana could lead to cross-tenant data interception. In this context, "tenant" refers to a user or team sharing the same Kibana deployment, not a separate Elastic Cloud organization or customer. Kibana's Fleet package installation process allowed a user holding delegated Fleet package-management privileges, without direct Elasticsearch administrative privileges, to claim a data stream identifier already in use by another tenant. Because ownership of that identifier was not verified before Fleet applied the uploaded package's generated index and ingest-pipeline settings to already-existing infrastructure, an attacker could redirect an existing tenant's data stream through infrastructure under their control. This exposed the affected tenant's subsequently ingested data to unauthorized disclosure and modification, and prevented that data from reaching its intended destination. Interception could continue even after the malicious package was removed, requiring separate remediation of the affected infrastructure.
CVE-2026-102157
Média · 5.9
CWE-639 06/10/2026
Security Advisory 0190
An insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability in a CloudVision CUE file-serving interface may allow an authenticated network user, under specific attack conditions, to access another user's transient data.
CVE-2026-106100
Alta · 7.1
CWE-639 06/10/2026
Payload: Field-level write access bypass in Payload on MongoDB
Payload is a free and open source headless content management system. In @payloadcms/db-mongodb versions before 3.87.0 and canary versions before 4.0.0-canary.20, an authenticated user who can update a document can modify fields that field-level write access control does not permit that user to change. The Postgres and SQLite adapters are not affected. This issue is fixed in versions 3.87.0 and 4.0.0-canary.20.
CVE-2026-105867
Média · 6.5
CWE-639 06/10/2026
Payload: Client uploads could overwrite S3 objects
Payload is a free and open source headless content management system. In @payloadcms/storage-s3 versions before 3.90.0 and canary versions before 4.0.0-canary.34, an authenticated user can overwrite an existing S3 object belonging to another upload collection when client uploads are enabled for multiple collections sharing a bucket and useCompositePrefixes is false or unset. This bypasses the target collection's access controls and prior file validation. This issue is fixed in versions 3.90.0 and 4.0.0-canary.34.
CVE-2026-105859
Crítica · 9.8
CWE-639 06/10/2026
Payload CMS: atualização não autorizada de documentos de coleções
Payload é um sistema de gerenciamento de conteúdo headless gratuito e de código aberto. Nas versões anteriores à 3.90.0 e nas versões canary anteriores à 4.0.0-canary.34, um atacante pode enviar uma requisição a um endpoint de atualização específico que modifica documentos de coleções sem aplicar o controle de acesso em nível de coleção ou de campo quando orderable está habilitado em uma coleção ou campo de junção. Este problema está corrigido nas versões 3.90.0 e 4.0.0-canary.34.
CVE-2026-87975
Média · 4.3
CWE-639 06/10/2026
Privilege abuse in model formsets with editable primary keys
An issue was discovered in Django 6.1 before 6.1.2, 6.0 before 6.0.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.18.
`django.forms.models.BaseModelFormSet.save_existing_objects()` used the presence of a primary key on a submitted form's instance as evidence that the instance belonged to the formset's limiting queryset. An object outside that queryset is represented by a newly constructed instance whose primary key can still be populated from submitted data when the model's primary key is a field accepted by the form, such as a `OneToOneField` or parent link used as the primary key of an inline formset's model, or a natural or UUID primary key included in the form's fields. This allows an authenticated user permitted to submit such a formset to delete rows outside the limiting queryset, without any permission on the targeted object, via forged management-form data marking an out-of-queryset object for deletion. Models using the default AutoField primary key are not affected.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Seonggwon Yoon for reporting this issue.
CVE-2026-105836
Média · 5.4
CWE-639 06/10/2026
QloApps through 1.7.0 Authorization Bypass via ajaxProcessBulkUpdateRooms
QloApps through 1.7.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in AdminProductsController::ajaxProcessBulkUpdateRooms that allows hotel-restricted back-office employees to modify rooms of other hotels. Attackers can submit foreign room IDs in the id_rooms parameter to change status, floor, comments, or inactive dates, disrupting availability and bookings.
CVE-2026-39756
Média · 6.5
CWE-639 06/10/2026
WordPress Wappointment plugin <= 2.7.7 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability
Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in Wappointment <= 2.7.7 versions.
CVE-2026-32576
Média · 6.5
CWE-639 06/10/2026
WordPress Faktur Pro for WooCommerce plugin <= 3.2.2 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in ZWEISCHNEIDER Faktur Pro for WooCommerce woorechnung allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Faktur Pro for WooCommerce: from n/a through 3.2.2.
CVE-2026-105761
Alta · 7.1
CWE-639 05/10/2026
Dify: IDOR in AppMCPServer PUT Endpoint Allows Modification of Other Apps' MCP Servers
Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.