CVE Intelligence
Analysis AI-assisted

CVE-2025-4319: Birebirsoft Sufirmam Excessive Login Attempts and Weak Password Recovery

CVE-2025-4319 describes improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts and a weak password recovery mechanism in Birebirsoft Sufirmam, enabling brute force and abuse of the recovery process. The record lists a critical CVSS base score of 9.4 and affects versions through 23012026. No fixed version is listed, and no confirmed exploitation appears in the sources consulted.

Published Oct 24, 2026 · Updated Oct 24, 2026 · Ler em português

Overview

The record describes two weaknesses in Birebirsoft Software and Technology Solutions Sufirmam: improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts (CWE-307) and a weak password recovery mechanism for forgotten passwords. According to the record, these weaknesses allow brute force attempts and exploitation of the password recovery process.

Impact

  • The record assigns a CVSS base score of 9.4, rated critical. The listed profile is network reachable, low complexity, no privileges and no user interaction required.
  • The listed impact is high for confidentiality, low for integrity and high for availability.
  • Successful abuse could allow unauthorized access to user accounts. This is an inference from the weakness class, not a confirmed outcome.

Affected products and versions

  • Product: Birebirsoft Software and Technology Solutions Sufirmam.
  • Affected range: through 23012026, as stated in the record.
  • The record lists no fixed version.

Exploitation status

  • The KEV catalog flag in the record is false, so this CVE is not listed there.
  • No confirmed exploitation appears in the sources consulted.
  • The record's SSVC fields show exploitation as none and automatable as no.
  • The EPSS probability is 0.00405 with a percentile of 0.33615.

Remediation and mitigation

  • The record does not confirm a vendor fix or patch. The vendor reportedly did not respond when contacted before disclosure.
  • Organizations using Sufirmam should ask the vendor whether a supported corrected version exists and whether a patch is planned.
  • While the status is unclear, reduce exposure: restrict access to trusted networks, check whether the password recovery function is reachable from the internet, and consider compensating controls such as rate limiting, lockout monitoring and multi-factor authentication where the product supports it.
  • Review account recovery workflows and reset credentials for accounts that may have been affected, following internal policy.

Detection guidance

  • Monitor authentication logs for high volumes of failed logins from one source or against many accounts.
  • Watch password recovery requests for unusual frequency or patterns and alert on sudden spikes.
  • Correlate these events with successful logins from unfamiliar sources or locations.

Limitations of the available information

  • The record gives no fixed version, no vendor advisory and no affected versions before the end date.
  • Two CVSS entries with the same score come from the providers iletisim@usom.gov.tr and TR-CERT. The record does not include a separate NVD score.
  • One government reference is marked as a broken link in the record.
  • The EPSS date field reads 2026-10-23, which is later than the publication date, so the EPSS values should be treated with caution.
  • Details on affected endpoints, authentication design and exploitation requirements are unknown.

Frequently asked questions

What is CVE-2025-4319?

It is a vulnerability record for Birebirsoft Sufirmam involving excessive authentication attempts and a weak password recovery mechanism. The record says it allows brute force attempts and abuse of password recovery.

Is there a fixed version available?

The record does not list any fixed version, and it does not confirm a patch. Users should ask the vendor directly about a corrected release.

Is this vulnerability being actively exploited?

The record shows the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, and no confirmed exploitation appears in the sources consulted. This does not rule out future exploitation.

This analysis was drafted with AI assistance from verified source data and automatically checked against it.