CVE-2009-0927 — Adobe Reader and Adobe Acrobat Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Stack-based buffer overflow in Adobe Reader and Adobe Acrobat 9 before 9.1, 8 before 8.1.3 , and 7 before 7.1.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted argument to the getIcon method of a Collab object, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-0658.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- Confirmed exploitation (CISA KEV)+35
- Exploited by 1 threat actor(s) (MITRE ATT&CK)+10
- Public exploit/PoC (metasploit, exploitdb)+20
- EPSS 96.6% (30-day exploitation probability)+15
- Technical severity (high)+6
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
- Documented patch — www.adobe.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
CISA required action CISA
Apply updates per vendor instructions.
US federal deadline: Apr 15, 2022 — passed 1645 day(s) ago
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Adobe Acrobat Reader).
- Treat as emergency remediation: the CVE is in CISA KEV (confirmed exploitation).
- The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
- Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
- Exploitation requires user interaction: tighten email/web filtering and warn affected users.
- EPSS ahead of 100% of scored CVEs: prioritize it in the patch queue.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (input validation), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe | Acrobat Reader | ≥ 7.0 and < 7.1.1≥ 8.0 and < 8.1.3≥ 9.0 and < 9.1 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | CVSS 3.1 | High | 2.8 | 5.9 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 8.8 | CVSS 3.1 | High | 2.8 | 5.9 | 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0 via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 8.8 | CVSS 3.1 | High | — | — | GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories |
| 8.8 | CVSS 3.1 | High | — | — | CISA-ADP via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| 9.3 | CVSS 2.0 | High | 8.6 | 10.0 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
CISA KEV details CISA
CISA lists a CVE once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.
CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a reference date.
Public exploits, PoCs and detection templates
Public code that demonstrates or tests the flaw raises the odds of mass exploitation — and Nuclei templates help find vulnerable assets in your environment.
- Adobe Collab.getIcon() Buffer Overflow good Mar 24, 2009
- Adobe Collab.getIcon() Buffer Overflow good Mar 24, 2009
- Adobe Acrobat Reader 8.1.2 < 9.0 - 'getIcon()' Memory Corruption verified May 4, 2009
- Adobe Acrobat/Reader < 7.1.1/8.1.3/9.1 - Collab getIcon Universal verified Sep 3, 2009
- Adobe - 'Collab.getIcon()' Local Buffer Overflow (Metasploit) (1) verified Apr 30, 2010
- Adobe - 'Collab.getIcon()' Local Buffer Overflow (Metasploit) (2) verified Sep 25, 2010
Warning: public PoCs are sometimes disguised malware. Use them only for authorized testing in an isolated environment. This portal does not host exploit code — it only points to the sources.
Threat actors exploiting this CVE MITRE ATT&CK
According to MITRE ATT&CK.
APT12 G0005EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 15, 2026 · 3 reading(s) · max 96.63%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
- Hunt retroactively in logs from before Mar 25, 2022 (KEV listing): exploitation may have started earlier.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Fix documented
- Affected products added · adobe/acrobat reader
- Source status changed · Published → Analyzed
- Record published
- CVSS changed · 8.8
- Source status changed · → Published
- SSVC assessment updated
- Added to CISA KEV (detected)
- Record created in this database
- 2022
- Added to CISA KEV catalog
- 2009
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 3× References added · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
References
19 on the record
- www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-04.html
- www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-03/msg00005.html
- secunia.com/advisories/34706
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/34169
- www.exploit-db.com/exploits/9579
- www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-09-014
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0927
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-04/msg00010.html
- www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0770
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200904-17.xml
- www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/502116/100/0/threaded
- www.securitytracker.com/id
- www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1019
- secunia.com/advisories/34490
- secunia.com/advisories/34790
- sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-wr9v-3qgm-q33g
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/49312
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Medium CVE-2026-82001 Acrobat Reader | Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) Sep 8, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-81993 Acrobat Reader | Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122) Sep 8, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-81994 Acrobat Reader | Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') (CWE-1321) Sep 8, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-81997 Acrobat Reader | Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) Sep 8, 2026
- High CVE-2026-81996 Acrobat Reader | Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) Sep 8, 2026
- High CVE-2026-81988 Acrobat Reader | Use After Free (CWE-416) Sep 8, 2026
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2009-0927 is "Adobe Reader and Adobe Acrobat Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability", rated High. It affects Acrobat Reader (Adobe); versions are in the scope table. It is in CISA KEV: there is evidence of real-world exploitation. CVSS 8.8 describes technical severity. EPSS 96.63% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.