CVE Intelligence
High Memory corruption

CVE-2016-10165 — The Type_MLU_Read function in cmstypes.c in Little CMS (aka lcms2) allows remote attackers to...

The Type_MLU_Read function in cmstypes.c in Little CMS (aka lcms2) allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service via an image with a crafted ICC profile, which triggers an out-of-bounds heap read.

Published Feb 3, 2017 · Updated Oct 15, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP, GitHub Security Advisories · CNA: mitre

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 2.8% (30-day exploitation probability)+13
  • Technical severity (high)+6

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
2.76%
ahead of 86% of scored CVEs · Oct 15, 2026
Affects
Canonical
Ubuntu Linux and 18 more
CVSS base
7.1
High · 2 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

  • Documented patch — www.openwall.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — www.openwall.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — www.oracle.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — github.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Canonical Ubuntu Linux, Debian Debian Linux, Littlecms Little Cms Color Engine…).
  2. Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
  3. Exploitation requires user interaction: tighten email/web filtering and warn affected users.
  4. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (memory corruption), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Canonical Ubuntu Linux version 12.04version 14.04version 16.04version 18.04 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Debian Debian Linux version 8.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Littlecms Little Cms Color Engine < 2.11 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Active Iq Unified Manager ≥ 9.5≥ 7.3 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp E-series Santricity Management versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp E-series Santricity Os Controller version 11.0.0version 11.20version 11.25version 11.30version 11.30.5r3version 11.40version 11.0version 11.40.3r2
and 10 more version 11.40.5version 11.50.1version 11.50.2version 11.50.2-p1version 11.60version 11.60.0version 11.60.1version 11.60.3version 11.70.1version 11.70.2
Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Oncommand Balance versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Oncommand Insight versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Oncommand Performance Manager versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Oncommand Shift versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Oncommand Unified Manager versions not specified by the sourceversion 7.1 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Opensuse Leap version 42.1 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop version 5.0version 6.0version 7.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server version 5.0version 6.0version 7.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Aus version 7.3version 7.4version 7.6version 7.7 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Eus version 7.6version 7.3version 7.4version 7.5version 7.7 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Tus version 7.7version 7.6version 7.3 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation version 5.0version 6.0version 7.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Red Hat Satellite version 5.8 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
7.1 CVSS 3.1 High 1.8 5.2 nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
7.1 CVSS 3.0 High — — GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories
5.8 CVSS 2.0 Medium 8.6 4.9 nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

Other CVEs with this weakness →

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Local/physical vector: focus on endpoint telemetry (EDR) from affected hosts.
  • Correlate service crashes/restarts with inbound traffic; repeated crashes may indicate attempts.
endpoint telemetry (EDR)crash dumps

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 15, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 15, 2026
  • Fix documented
    Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Affected products added · littlecms/little cms color engine, canonical/ubuntu linux, debian/debian linux, opensuse/leap, redhat/satellite, redhat/
    Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVSS changed · 7.1
    Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Modified
    Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 15, 2026 · Alertas do Telegram
  • 2017
  • CVE published
    Feb 3, 2017 · mitre

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 2× References added · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026
  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026

References

24 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Canonical
every CVE for this vendor
CWE-125
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • High CVE-2026-12540 Foreman: command injection in foreman-rake errors:fetch_log via request_id parameter 14d
  • High CVE-2026-12544 Foreman: ssti and insecure deserialization in foreman-rake configuration 14d
  • High CVE-2026-12541 Foreman: command injection in foreman-rake database tasks 14d
  • High CVE-2026-12423 Foreman: unauthenticated information disclosure via provisioning token validation flaw 14d
  • Medium CVE-2026-81658 Foreman: cross-tenant disclosure of template revisions via unauthorized audit lookup Aug 27, 2026
  • High CVE-2026-12996 A use-after-free in OpenVPN 2.6.0 through 2.6.20 and 2.7_alpha1 through 2.7.4 allows remote... Jul 30, 2026

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2016-10165 is "The Type_MLU_Read function in cmstypes.c in Little CMS (aka lcms2) allows remote attackers to...", rated High. It affects Ubuntu Linux (Canonical); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.1 describes technical severity. EPSS 2.76% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.