CVE-2016-6366 — Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) SNMP Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Buffer overflow in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software through 9.4.2.3 on ASA 5500, ASA 5500-X, ASA Services Module, ASA 1000V, ASAv, Firepower 9300 ASA Security Module, PIX, and FWSM devices allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via crafted IPv4 SNMP packets, aka Bug ID CSCva92151 or EXTRABACON.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- Confirmed exploitation (CISA KEV)+35
- Public exploit/PoC (metasploit, exploitdb)+20
- EPSS 87.6% (30-day exploitation probability)+15
- Technical severity (high)+6
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
CISA required action CISA
Apply updates per vendor instructions.
US federal deadline: Jun 14, 2022 — passed 1584 day(s) ago
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Cisco Asa 1000v Cloud Firewall Software, Cisco Pix Firewall Software).
- Treat as emergency remediation: the CVE is in CISA KEV (confirmed exploitation).
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- EPSS ahead of 100% of scored CVEs: prioritize it in the patch queue.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (memory corruption), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco | Adaptive Security Appliance Software | ≥ 7.2.1 and < 9.0.4.40≥ 9.1.1 and < 9.1.7\(9\)≥ 9.2.0 and < 9.2.4\(14\)≥ 9.3.0 and < 9.3.3\(10\)≥ 9.4.0.115 and < 9.4.3\(8\)≥ 9.5.0 and ≤ 9.5\(3\)≥ 9.6.0 and < 9.6.1\(11\) | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Cisco | Asa 1000v Cloud Firewall Software | version 8.7.1version 8.7.1.1 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Cisco | Pix Firewall Software | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | CVSS 3.1 | High | 2.8 | 5.9 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 8.8 | CVSS 3.1 | High | 2.8 | 5.9 | 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0 via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 8.8 | CVSS 3.1 | High | — | — | CISA-ADP via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| 8.8 | CVSS 3.0 | High | — | — | GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories |
| 8.5 | CVSS 2.0 | High | 6.8 | 10.0 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
CISA KEV details CISA
CISA lists a CVE once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.
CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a reference date.
Public exploits, PoCs and detection templates
Public code that demonstrates or tests the flaw raises the odds of mass exploitation — and Nuclei templates help find vulnerable assets in your environment.
- Cisco ASA 8.x - 'EXTRABACON' Authentication Bypass Aug 18, 2016
Warning: public PoCs are sometimes disguised malware. Use them only for authorized testing in an isolated environment. This portal does not host exploit code — it only points to the sources.
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 87.57%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
- Correlate service crashes/restarts with inbound traffic; repeated crashes may indicate attempts.
- Hunt retroactively in logs from before May 24, 2022 (KEV listing): exploitation may have started earlier.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- SSVC assessment updated
- Record published
- Affected products added · cisco/pix firewall software, cisco/adaptive security appliance software, cisco/asa 1000v cloud firewall software
- CVSS changed · 8.8
- Source status changed · → Analyzed
- Added to CISA KEV (detected)
- Record created in this database
- 2022
- Added to CISA KEV catalog
- 2016
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 2× References added · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
References
12 on the record
- tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewErp.x
- tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20160817-asa-s
- blogs.cisco.com/security/shadow-brokers
- www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
- github.com/offensive-security/exploit-database-bin-sploits/raw/master/sploits/40
- www.securitytracker.com/id/1036637
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-pfgh-2mw6-962h
- www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40258/
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/92521
- zerosum0x0.blogspot.com/2016/09/reverse-engineering-cisco-asa-for.html
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-6366
- www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40258
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- High CVE-2026-20349 Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Heap Inspection Vulnerability KEV Aug 11, 2026
- High CVE-2026-20012 Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime in Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Mar 25, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-20024 Buffer Errors (Improper Restriction of Operations within Memory Bounds) in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Mar 4, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-20025 Integer Overflow or Wraparound in Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Mar 4, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-20023 Out-of-bounds Write in Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Mar 4, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-20021 Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Mar 4, 2026
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2016-6366 is "Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) SNMP Buffer Overflow Vulnerability", rated High. It affects Adaptive Security Appliance Software (Cisco); versions are in the scope table. It is in CISA KEV: there is evidence of real-world exploitation. CVSS 8.8 describes technical severity. EPSS 87.57% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.