CVE-2016-9840 — inftrees.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified…
inftrees.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging improper pointer arithmetic.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 4.9% (30-day exploitation probability)+14
- Technical severity (high)+6
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
- Documented patch — github.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Apple Iphone Os, Apple Mac Os X, Apple Tvos…).
- The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
- Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
- Exploitation requires user interaction: tighten email/web filtering and warn affected users.
- EPSS ahead of 92% of scored CVEs: prioritize it in the patch queue.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple | Iphone Os | < 11 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Apple | Mac Os X | ≥ 10.0.0 and < 10.13.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Apple | Tvos | < 11.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Apple | Watchos | < 4 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Boost | Boost | < 1.78.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Canonical | Ubuntu Linux | version 16.04version 18.04 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Debian | Debian Linux | version 8.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Nodejs | Node.js | ≥ 4.0.0 and ≤ 4.1.2≥ 7.0.0 and < 7.6.0≥ 6.9.0 and < 6.10.2≥ 6.0.0 and ≤ 6.8.1≥ 4.2.0 and < 4.8.2 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Opensuse | Leap | version 42.1version 42.2 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Opensuse | Opensuse | version 13.2 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Oracle | Database Server | version 18c | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Oracle | Jdk | version 1.6.0-update161version 1.7.0-update151version 1.8.0-update144 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Oracle | Jre | version 1.8.0-update144version 1.7.0-update151version 1.6.0-update161 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Oracle | Mysql | ≥ 8.0.0 and ≤ 8.0.12≥ 5.7.0 and ≤ 5.7.23≥ 5.6.0 and ≤ 5.6.41≥ 5.5.0 and ≤ 5.5.61 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux Desktop | version 7.0version 6.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux Eus | version 7.4version 7.5 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux Server | version 6.0version 7.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux Workstation | version 7.0version 6.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Satellite | version 5.8 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Zlib | Zlib | ≥ 1.2.0.6 and < 1.2.9 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | CVSS 3.1 | High | 2.8 | 5.9 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 6.8 | CVSS 2.0 | Medium | 8.6 | 6.4 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov) EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 4.88%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- SSVC assessment updated
- Record published
- Fix documented
- CVSS changed · 8.8
- Source status changed · → Modified
- Record created in this database
- 2017
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
References
31 on the record
- github.com/madler/zlib/commit/6a043145ca6e9c55184013841a67b2fef87e44c0
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/95131
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
- support.apple.com/HT208113
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2999
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-470355.html
- usn.ubuntu.com/4246-1/
- www.securitytracker.com/id/1039427
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/202007-54
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1222
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3453
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00050.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html
- wiki.mozilla.org/MOSS/Secure_Open_Source/Completed
- support.apple.com/HT208112
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1220
- www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html
- usn.ubuntu.com/4292-1/
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3046
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2017-01/msg00053.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-12/msg00127.html
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00027.html
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3047
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/12/05/21
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-56
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1221
- wiki.mozilla.org/images/0/09/Zlib-report.pdf
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/01/msg00030.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html
- support.apple.com/HT208144
- support.apple.com/HT208115
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- High CVE-2026-12544 Foreman: ssti and insecure deserialization in foreman-rake configuration 14d
- High CVE-2026-12540 Foreman: command injection in foreman-rake errors:fetch_log via request_id parameter 14d
- High CVE-2026-12541 Foreman: command injection in foreman-rake database tasks 14d
- High CVE-2026-12423 Foreman: unauthenticated information disclosure via provisioning token validation flaw 14d
- High CVE-2026-86950 Apple Multiple Products Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability KEV 17d
- Medium CVE-2026-86903 Out-of-bounds Read in Apple Ipados Sep 14, 2026
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No CWE classification.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2016-9840 is "inftrees.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified…", rated High. It affects Iphone Os (Apple); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 8.8 describes technical severity. EPSS 4.88% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.