CVE-2017-16932 — Nokogiri gem, via libxml, is affected by DoS vulnerabilities
parser.c in libxml2 before 2.9.5 does not prevent infinite recursion in parameter entities.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 6.5% (30-day exploitation probability)+14
- Technical severity (high)+6
- Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
- Documented patch — github.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
- Rubygems Nokogiri: fixed in version 1.8.1 — github.com (GitHub Security Advisories)
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Xmlsoft Libxml2, Rubygems Nokogiri).
- The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
- Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
- EPSS ahead of 94% of scored CVEs: prioritize it in the patch queue.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (denial of service), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | CVSS 3.1 | High | 3.9 | 3.6 | 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0 via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 7.5 | CVSS 3.1 | High | — | — | CISA-ADP via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| 7.5 | CVSS 3.0 | High | 3.9 | 3.6 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 7.5 | CVSS 3.0 | High | — | — | GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories |
| 5.0 | CVSS 2.0 | Medium | 10.0 | 2.9 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H (score shown at the top: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 6.45%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
- Track CPU/memory spikes and availability drops correlated with request patterns.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Fix documented
- Affected products added · rubygems/nokogiri
- SSVC assessment updated
- Record published
- Fix documented
- Affected products added · xmlsoft/libxml2
- CVSS changed · 7.5
- Source status changed · → Modified
- Record created in this database
- 2017
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 2× References added · Oct 14, 2026 – Oct 14, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 14, 2026 – Oct 14, 2026
References
17 on the record
- xmlsoft.org/news.html
- github.com/GNOME/libxml2/commit/899a5d9f0ed13b8e32449a08a361e0de127dd961
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-16932
- bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi
- lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/04/msg00004.html
- lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b
- gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/commit/899a5d9f0ed13b8e32449a08a361e0de127dd961
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-x2fm-93ww-ggvx
- github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/nokogiri/CVE-2017-16932.yml
- blog.clamav.net/2018/07/clamav-01001-has-been-released.html
- usn.ubuntu.com/3739-1/
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/11/msg00041.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-398330.html
- github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/issues/1714
- lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4
- lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- High CVE-2026-86144 Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres in Xmlsoft Libxml2 Sep 5, 2026
- High CVE-2026-86143 In xmlIO in libxml2 before 2.15.4, an inconsistency in xmlOutputWriteCallback and… Sep 5, 2026
- Low CVE-2026-86141 Unchecked Return Value in Xmlsoft Libxml2 Sep 5, 2026
- High CVE-2026-86142 Heap-based Buffer Overflow in Xmlsoft Libxml2 Sep 5, 2026
- High CVE-2026-86138 Integer Overflow or Wraparound in Xmlsoft Libxml2 Sep 5, 2026
- High CVE-2026-86140 Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Xmlsoft Libxml2 Sep 5, 2026
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2017-16932 is "Nokogiri gem, via libxml, is affected by DoS vulnerabilities", rated High. It affects Libxml2 (Xmlsoft); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.5 describes technical severity. EPSS 6.45% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.