CVE Intelligence
Medium Cryptography

CVE-2018-0734 — Timing attack against DSA

The OpenSSL DSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2q (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2p).

Published Oct 30, 2018 · Updated Oct 13, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: openssl

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 12.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+14
  • Technical severity (medium)+3
  • Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
12.15%
ahead of 96% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026
Affects
Canonical
Ubuntu Linux and 18 more
CVSS base
5.9
Medium · 1 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
Yes
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

  • Documented patch — www.oracle.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — www.oracle.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — www.oracle.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Canonical Ubuntu Linux, Debian Debian Linux, Netapp Cloud Backup…).
  2. The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
  3. Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
  4. EPSS ahead of 96% of scored CVEs: prioritize it in the patch queue.
  5. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (cryptography), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Canonical Ubuntu Linux version 14.04version 16.04version 18.04version 18.10 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Debian Debian Linux version 9.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Cloud Backup versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Cn1610 Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Oncommand Unified Manager versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Santricity Smi-s Provider versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Snapcenter versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Steelstore versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Storage Automation Store versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Nodejs Node.js ≥ 8.0.0 and ≤ 8.8.1≥ 6.0.0 and ≤ 6.8.1version 10.13.0≥ 10.0.0 and ≤ 10.12.0≥ 6.9.0 and < 6.15.0≥ 11.0.0 and < 11.3.0≥ 8.9.0 and < 8.14.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Openssl Openssl ≥ 1.0.2 and ≤ 1.0.2p≥ 1.1.0 and ≤ 1.1.0iversion 1.1.1 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Openssl Openssl version Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1)version Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i)version Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2q (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2p) Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Oracle Api Gateway version 11.1.2.4.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle E-business Suite Technology Stack version 1.0.0version 0.9.8version 1.0.1 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform version 13.3.0.0.0version 13.2.0.0.0version 12.1.0.5.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Enterprise Manager Ops Center version 12.3.3 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Mysql Enterprise Backup ≥ 3.0 and ≤ 3.12.3≥ 4.0 and ≤ 4.1.2 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Peoplesoft Enterprise Peopletools version 8.56version 8.55version 8.57 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Primavera P6 Professional Project Management ≥ 17.7 and ≤ 17.12version 8.4version 15.1version 15.2version 16.1version 16.2version 18.8 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Tuxedo version 12.1.1.0.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
5.9 CVSS 3.1 Medium 2.2 3.6 nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
4.3 CVSS 2.0 Medium 8.6 2.9 nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-327 · Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 12.15%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
  • Check TLS negotiations and unexpected certificates in the component’s traffic.
web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPS

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Affected products added · openssl/openssl
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 13, 2026
  • Fix documented
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVSS changed · 5.9
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Modified
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • 2018
  • CVE published
    Oct 30, 2018 · openssl

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

29 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Canonical
every CVE for this vendor
Cryptography
same class
CWE-327
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • High CVE-2026-84783 Use-After-Free in X.509 Extension Cache Under Concurrent Use 16d
  • High CVE-2026-84784 QUIC: Unbounded RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID Backlog 16d
  • High CVE-2026-84782 DTLS Retransmits Handshake Messages From a Stale Buffer Offset 16d
  • Medium CVE-2026-75806 Unauthenticated and Undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD Record Causes DoS 16d
  • Medium CVE-2026-75805 NULL Pointer Dereference in CMP Client Revocation Response Handling 16d
  • Low CVE-2026-77696 Timing Side-Channel in SM2 Signature Generation 16d

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2018-0734 is "Timing attack against DSA", rated Medium. It affects Ubuntu Linux (Canonical); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 5.9 describes technical severity. EPSS 12.15% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.