CVE Intelligence
High Injection exploit reference

CVE-2020-26217 — Remote Code Execution in XStream

XStream before version 1.4.14 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution.The vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to run arbitrary shell commands only by manipulating the processed input stream. Only users who rely on blocklists are affected. Anyone using XStream's Security Framework allowlist is not affected. The linked advisory provides code workarounds for users who cannot upgrade. The issue is fixed in version 1.4.14.

Published Nov 16, 2020 · Updated Oct 13, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: GitHub_M

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

How the score was calculated
  • Public exploit/PoC (nuclei)+4
  • EPSS 85% (30-day exploitation probability)+15
  • Technical severity (high)+6
  • Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
85%
ahead of 100% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026
Affects
Apache Software Foundation
Apache ActiveMQ and 14 more
CVSS base
8.8
High · 3 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
Yes
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

  • Documented patch — github.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented mitigation — github.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — www.oracle.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — www.oracle.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — www.oracle.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented mitigation — x-stream.github.io (NIST National Vulnerability Database)

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Apache Software Foundation Apache ActiveMQ, Debian Debian Linux, Netapp Snapmanager…).
  2. Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
  3. EPSS ahead of 100% of scored CVEs: prioritize it in the patch queue.
  4. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (injection), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Apache Software Foundation Apache ActiveMQ < 5.15.14version 5.16.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Debian Debian Linux version 10.0version 9.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Snapmanager versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Banking Cash Management version 14.5version 14.3version 14.2 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Banking Corporate Lending Process Management version 14.5version 14.3version 14.2 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Banking Credit Facilities Process Management version 14.2version 14.3version 14.5 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Banking Platform version 2.4.0version 2.7.1version 2.9.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Banking Supply Chain Finance version 14.2version 14.3version 14.5 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Banking Trade Finance Process Management version 14.5version 14.3version 14.2 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Banking Virtual Account Management version 14.5.0version 14.3.0version 14.2.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Business Activity Monitoring version 11.1.1.9.0version 12.2.1.3.0version 12.2.1.4.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Communications Policy Management version 12.5.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Endeca Information Discovery Studio version 3.2.0.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Retail Xstore Point Of Service version 16.0.6version 17.0.4version 19.0.2version 18.0.3 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Xstream Xstream < 1.4.14 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Xstream Xstream version < 1.4.14 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
8.8 CVSS 3.1 High 2.8 5.9 nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
8.0 CVSS 3.1 High 1.3 6.0 security-advisories@github.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
8.0 CVSS 3.1 High — — GitHub_M via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
9.3 CVSS 2.0 High 8.6 10.0 nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov)
Scoring entities (NIST, CNA, ADP) score independently; each score is shown with its origin. For prioritization we use 8.8 (NVD (NIST)) as a conservative provisional reference — not a definitive official score.

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-78 · OS Command Injection

Other CVEs with this weakness →

Public exploits, PoCs and detection templates

Public code that demonstrates or tests the flaw raises the odds of mass exploitation — and Nuclei templates help find vulnerable assets in your environment.

Detection templates (Nuclei)

Warning: public PoCs are sometimes disguised malware. Use them only for authorized testing in an isolated environment. This portal does not host exploit code — it only points to the sources.

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 85.00%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
  • Look for parameters with command/query metacharacters and unexpected child processes of the service.
web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPSapplication logsendpoint telemetry (EDR)

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Affected products added · x-stream/xstream
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 13, 2026
  • Fix documented
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVSS changed · 8.8
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Analyzed
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • 2020
  • CVE published
    Nov 16, 2020 · GitHub_M

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

15 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Apache Software Foundation
every CVE for this vendor
Injection
same class
CWE-78
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • High CVE-2026-83206 Improper Access Control in Oracle Banking Corporate Lending Process Management Sep 15, 2026
  • High CVE-2026-74761 Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ: Spoofing of RemoveSubscription clientId Sep 9, 2026
  • High CVE-2026-12996 A use-after-free in OpenVPN 2.6.0 through 2.6.20 and 2.7_alpha1 through 2.7.4 allows remote... Jul 30, 2026
  • High CVE-2026-59878 Apache ActiveMQ AMQP, Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ All: AMQP NIO negative frame size validation bypass leading to DoS Jul 28, 2026
  • Medium CVE-2026-61487 Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ: Authorization bypass via temporary composite destinations Jul 28, 2026
  • Critical CVE-2026-61097 Improper Access Control in Oracle Banking Trade Finance Process Management Jul 21, 2026

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2020-26217 is "Remote Code Execution in XStream", rated High. It affects Apache ActiveMQ (Apache Software Foundation); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 8.8 describes technical severity. EPSS 85.00% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.