CVE Intelligence
Critical Memory corruption

CVE-2021-3711 — SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow

In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the "out" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a maximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically heap allocated. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k).

Published Aug 24, 2021 · Updated Oct 13, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP, GitHub Security Advisories · CNA: openssl

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 87.8% (30-day exploitation probability)+15
  • Technical severity (critical)+10
  • Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
87.82%
ahead of 100% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026
Affects
Debian
Debian Linux and 31 more
CVSS base
9.8
Critical · 2 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
Yes
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

  • Documented patch — www.oracle.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — www.oracle.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — www.oracle.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Rust Openssl-src: fixed in version 111.16.0 — github.com (GitHub Security Advisories)

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Debian Debian Linux, Netapp Active Iq Unified Manager, Netapp Clustered Data Ontap…).
  2. The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
  3. Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
  4. EPSS ahead of 100% of scored CVEs: prioritize it in the patch queue.
  5. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (memory corruption), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Debian Debian Linux version 11.0version 10.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Active Iq Unified Manager versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Clustered Data Ontap versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Clustered Data Ontap Antivirus Connector versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp E-series Santricity Os Controller ≥ 11.0 and ≤ 11.50.2 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Hci Management Node versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Manageability Software Development Kit versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Oncommand Insight versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Oncommand Workflow Automation versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Santricity Smi-s Provider versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Snapcenter versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Solidfire versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Storage Encryption versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Openssl Openssl ≥ 1.1.1 and < 1.1.1l Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Openssl Openssl version Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k) Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Oracle Communications Cloud Native Core Security Edge Protection Proxy version 1.7.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Communications Cloud Native Core Unified Data Repository version 1.15.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Communications Session Border Controller version 8.4version 9.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Communications Unified Session Manager version 8.4.5version 8.2.5 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Enterprise Communications Broker version 3.2.0version 3.3.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Enterprise Session Border Controller version 9.0version 8.4 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Essbase < 11.1.2.4.47≥ 21.1 and < 21.3 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Health Sciences Inform Publisher version 6.3.1.1version 6.2.1.1 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Jd Edwards Enterpriseone Tools < 9.2.6.3 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Jd Edwards World Security version a9.4 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Mysql Connectors ≤ 8.0.27 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Mysql Enterprise Monitor ≤ 8.0.25 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Mysql Server ≥ 5.7.0 and ≤ 5.7.35≥ 8.0.0 and ≤ 8.0.26 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Peoplesoft Enterprise Peopletools version 8.58version 8.57version 8.59 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Zfs Storage Appliance Kit version 8.8 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Tenable Nessus Network Monitor ≤ 5.13.1 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Tenable Tenable.sc ≥ 5.16.0 and ≤ 5.19.1 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Rust Openssl-src < 111.16.0 Vulnerable GitHub Security Advisories

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
9.8 CVSS 3.1 Critical 3.9 5.9 nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
9.8 CVSS 3.1 Critical — — GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories
7.5 CVSS 2.0 High 10.0 6.4 nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-120 · Classic Buffer Overflow

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 87.82%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
  • Correlate service crashes/restarts with inbound traffic; repeated crashes may indicate attempts.
web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPSendpoint telemetry (EDR)crash dumps

Analysis and videos

CVE-2021-3711: OpenSSL SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow
CVE-2021-3711 is a buffer overflow in the SM2 decryption code of OpenSSL. The buffer size calculated during the first EVP_PKEY_decrypt() call can be smaller than the size needed by the second call, which may let attacker-chosen data overflow the buffer by up to 62 bytes. The NVD record gives it a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8 (critical), and the fix is in OpenSSL 1.1.1l. The CVE is not listed in CISA KEV and no confirmed exploitation appears in the sources consulted.

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Fix documented
    Oct 13, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisories
  • Affected products added · rust/openssl-src
    Oct 13, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisories
  • Affected products added · openssl/openssl
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 13, 2026
  • Fix documented
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVSS changed · 9.8
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Modified
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • 2021
  • CVE published
    Aug 24, 2021 · openssl

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× References added · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

26 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Debian
every CVE for this vendor
CWE-120
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • High CVE-2026-84782 DTLS Retransmits Handshake Messages From a Stale Buffer Offset 16d
  • High CVE-2026-84784 QUIC: Unbounded RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID Backlog 16d
  • High CVE-2026-84783 Use-After-Free in X.509 Extension Cache Under Concurrent Use 16d
  • Medium CVE-2026-75806 Unauthenticated and Undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD Record Causes DoS 16d
  • Low CVE-2026-77696 Timing Side-Channel in SM2 Signature Generation 16d
  • Medium CVE-2026-75805 NULL Pointer Dereference in CMP Client Revocation Response Handling 16d

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2021-3711 is "SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow", rated Critical. It affects Debian Linux (Debian); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 9.8 describes technical severity. EPSS 87.82% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.