CVE Intelligence
High Injection

CVE-2022-1292 — The c_rehash script allows command injection

The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd).

Published May 3, 2022 · Updated Oct 14, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP, GitHub Security Advisories · CNA: openssl

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 82.6% (30-day exploitation probability)+15
  • Technical severity (high)+6
  • CISA SSVC: exploitation "poc"+5
  • Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
82.61%
ahead of 100% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026
Affects
Debian
Debian Linux and 34 more
CVSS base
7.3
High · 4 source(s)
Prioritization reference: 9.8 provisional

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
Proof of concept
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
Yes
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Debian Debian Linux, Fedoraproject Fedora, Netapp A250 Firmware…).
  2. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  3. Exploitation requires user interaction: tighten email/web filtering and warn affected users.
  4. EPSS ahead of 100% of scored CVEs: prioritize it in the patch queue.
  5. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (injection), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Debian Debian Linux version 9.0version 10.0version 11.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Fedoraproject Fedora version 36version 35 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp A250 Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp A700s Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Active Iq Unified Manager versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Aff 500f Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Aff 8300 Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Aff 8700 Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Aff A400 Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Clustered Data Ontap versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Clustered Data Ontap Antivirus Connector versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Fabric-attached Storage A400 Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Fas 500f Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Fas 8300 Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Fas 8700 Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp H300e Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp H300s Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp H410s Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp H500e Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp H500s Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp H700e Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp H700s Firmware versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Oncommand Insight versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Oncommand Workflow Automation versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Santricity Smi-s Provider versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Smi-s Provider versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Snapcenter versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Snapmanager versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Solidfire & Hci Management Node versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Netapp Solidfire, Enterprise Sds & Hci Storage Node versions not specified by the source Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Openssl Openssl version Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd)version Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n)version Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2) Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Openssl Openssl ≥ 1.0.2 and < 1.0.2ze≥ 3.0.0 and < 3.0.3≥ 1.1.1 and < 1.1.1o Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Enterprise Manager Ops Center version 12.4.0.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Mysql Server ≥ 8.0.0 and ≤ 8.0.29≥ 5.0.0 and ≤ 5.7.38 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Oracle Mysql Workbench ≤ 8.0.29 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Siemens Brownfield Connectivity Gateway < 2.15 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
9.8 CVSS 3.1 Critical 3.9 5.9 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0 via NIST National Vulnerability Database
9.8 CVSS 3.1 Critical — — GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories
9.8 CVSS 3.1 Critical — — CISA-ADP via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
7.3 CVSS 3.1 High 1.3 5.9 nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
10.0 CVSS 2.0 High 10.0 10.0 nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov)
Scoring entities (NIST, CNA, ADP) score independently; each score is shown with its origin. For prioritization we use 9.8 (CISA ADP via NIST National Vulnerability Database) as a conservative provisional reference — not a definitive official score.

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-78 · OS Command Injection

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 82.61%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Local/physical vector: focus on endpoint telemetry (EDR) from affected hosts.
  • Look for parameters with command/query metacharacters and unexpected child processes of the service.
endpoint telemetry (EDR)application logs

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Affected products added · openssl/openssl
    Oct 14, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 14, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 14, 2026
  • Affected products added · siemens/brownfield connectivity gateway, openssl/openssl, debian/debian linux, netapp/active iq unified manager, netapp/
    Oct 14, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVSS changed · 7.3
    Oct 14, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Modified
    Oct 14, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 14, 2026 · Alertas do Telegram
  • 2022
  • CVE published
    May 3, 2022 · openssl

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 2× References added · Oct 14, 2026 – Oct 14, 2026
  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 14, 2026 – Oct 14, 2026

References

32 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Debian
every CVE for this vendor
Injection
same class
CWE-78
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • High CVE-2026-84784 QUIC: Unbounded RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID Backlog 16d
  • High CVE-2026-84782 DTLS Retransmits Handshake Messages From a Stale Buffer Offset 16d
  • High CVE-2026-84783 Use-After-Free in X.509 Extension Cache Under Concurrent Use 16d
  • Low CVE-2026-77696 Timing Side-Channel in SM2 Signature Generation 16d
  • Medium CVE-2026-75805 NULL Pointer Dereference in CMP Client Revocation Response Handling 16d
  • Medium CVE-2026-75806 Unauthenticated and Undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD Record Causes DoS 16d

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2022-1292 is "The c_rehash script allows command injection", rated High. It affects Debian Linux (Debian); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.3 describes technical severity. EPSS 82.61% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.