CVE-2022-22950 — Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in Spring Framework
n Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.16 and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL expression that may cause a denial of service condition.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 36.1% (30-day exploitation probability)+15
- Technical severity (medium)+3
- Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
- Documented mitigation — tanzu.vmware.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
- Maven Org.springframework:spring-expression: fixed in version 5.3.17 — github.com (GitHub Security Advisories)
- Maven Org.springframework:spring-expression: fixed in version 5.2.20.RELEASE — github.com (GitHub Security Advisories)
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Vmware Spring Framework, Maven Org.springframework:spring-expression).
- Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
- EPSS ahead of 98% of scored CVEs: prioritize it in the patch queue.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (denial of service), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vmware | Spring Framework | < 5.2.20≥ 5.3.0 and < 5.3.17 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Maven | Org.springframework:spring-expression | ≥ 5.3.0 and < 5.3.17< 5.2.20.RELEASE | Vulnerable | GitHub Security Advisories |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.5 | CVSS 3.1 | Medium | 2.8 | 3.6 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 6.5 | CVSS 3.1 | Medium | — | — | GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories |
| 4.0 | CVSS 2.0 | Medium | 8.0 | 2.9 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
CWE-770 · Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 36.08%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
- Track CPU/memory spikes and availability drops correlated with request patterns.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Fix documented
- Affected products added · maven/org.springframework:spring-expression
- SSVC assessment updated
- Record published
- Fix documented
- CVSS changed · 6.5
- Source status changed · → Modified
- Record created in this database
- 2022
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× References added · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
References
8 on the record
- tanzu.vmware.com/security/cve-2022-22950
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-22950
- github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28145
- github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/releases/tag/v5.2.20.RELEASE
- github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commit/83ac65915871067c39a4fb255e0d4
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-558x-2xjg-6232
- github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/28257
- github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/releases/tag/v5.3.17
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Low CVE-2026-59314 HTTP Response Splitting in Vmware Spring Framework Aug 27, 2026
- Critical CVE-2026-59313 Spring MVC applications using the functional web framework are vulnerable to stream… Aug 27, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-59281 Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in Vmware Spring Framework Aug 27, 2026
- High CVE-2026-59282 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Vmware Spring Framework Aug 27, 2026
- Critical CVE-2026-59283 Improper Control of Dynamically-Managed Code Resources in Vmware Spring Framework Aug 27, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-59280 Path Traversal in Vmware Spring Framework Aug 27, 2026
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2022-22950 is "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in Spring Framework", rated Medium. It affects Spring Framework (Vmware); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 6.5 describes technical severity. EPSS 36.08% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.