CVE-2023-3338 — Crash due to a null pointer dereference in the dn_nsp_send function
A null pointer dereference flaw was found in the Linux kernel's DECnet networking protocol. This issue could allow a remote user to crash the system.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 8.3% (30-day exploitation probability)+14
- Technical severity (medium)+3
- CISA SSVC: exploitation "poc"+5
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Debian Debian Linux, Fedora Fedora, Linux Linux Kernel…).
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- EPSS ahead of 95% of scored CVEs: prioritize it in the patch queue.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (memory corruption), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debian | Debian Linux | version 10.0version 11.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Fedora | Fedora | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | < 6.5 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Netapp | Active Iq Unified Manager | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | CVSS 3.1 | High | — | — | GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories |
| 6.5 | CVSS 3.1 | Medium | 2.8 | 3.6 | secalert@redhat.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 6.5 | CVSS 3.1 | Medium | 2.8 | 3.6 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 6.5 | CVSS 3.1 | Medium | — | — | redhat via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
- Correlate service crashes/restarts with inbound traffic; repeated crashes may indicate attempts.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Affected products added · fedora/fedora
- SSVC assessment updated
- Record published
- Affected products added · linux/linux kernel, netapp/active iq unified manager, debian/debian linux
- CVSS changed · 6.5
- Source status changed · → Modified
- Record created in this database
- 2023
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 2× References added · Oct 14, 2026 – Oct 14, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 14, 2026 – Oct 14, 2026
References
11 on the record
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-qj9w-7hh5-mf2q
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00027.html
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-3338
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230824-0005/
- www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5480
- seclists.org/oss-sec/2023/q2/276
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794697.html
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-3338
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230824-0005
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/07/msg00030.html
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Medium CVE-2026-98164 KVM: x86/mmu: Check write tracking in all address spaces 16d
- High CVE-2026-98163 cgroup: Avoid iteration of dying tasks with zero refcount 19d
- Medium CVE-2026-98162 smb/server: fix tree connection leak in smb2_tree_connect() 20d
- High CVE-2026-98156 drm/virtio: use the DMA API for resource backing on Xen 20d
- Medium CVE-2026-98159 wifi: mt76: mt7921: validate CLC firmware records 20d
- High CVE-2026-98136 ntfs: bound $AttrDef table walk to the loaded table size 20d
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2023-3338 is "Crash due to a null pointer dereference in the dn_nsp_send function", rated Medium. It affects Debian Linux (Debian); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 6.5 describes technical severity. EPSS 8.29% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.