CVE Intelligence
Unknown

CVE-2023-54265 — ipv6: Fix an uninit variable access bug in __ip6_make_skb()

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: Fix an uninit variable access bug in __ip6_make_skb() Syzbot reported a bug as following: ===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in arch_atomic64_inc arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:88 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in arch_atomic_long_inc include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:161 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in atomic_long_inc include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:1429 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __ip6_make_skb+0x2f37/0x30f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1956 arch_atomic64_inc arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:88 [inline] arch_atomic_long_inc include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:161 [inline] atomic_long_inc include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:1429 [inline] __ip6_make_skb+0x2f37/0x30f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1956 ip6_finish_skb include/net/ipv6.h:1122 [inline] ip6_push_pending_frames+0x10e/0x550 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1987 rawv6_push_pending_frames+0xb12/0xb90 net/ipv6/raw.c:579 rawv6_sendmsg+0x297e/0x2e60 net/ipv6/raw.c:922 inet_sendmsg+0x101/0x180 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:827 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline] sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:734 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0xa8e/0xe70 net/socket.c:2476 ___sys_sendmsg+0x2a1/0x3f0 net/socket.c:2530 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2559 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2568 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2566 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x367/0x540 net/socket.c:2566 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:766 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3452 [inline] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x71f/0xce0 mm/slub.c:3491 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:967 [inline] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x114/0x3b0 mm/slab_common.c:988 kmalloc_reserve net/core/skbuff.c:492 [inline] __alloc_skb+0x3af/0x8f0 net/core/skbuff.c:565 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1270 [inline] __ip6_append_data+0x51c1/0x6bb0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1684 ip6_append_data+0x411/0x580 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1854 rawv6_sendmsg+0x2882/0x2e60 net/ipv6/raw.c:915 inet_sendmsg+0x101/0x180 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:827 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline] sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:734 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0xa8e/0xe70 net/socket.c:2476 ___sys_sendmsg+0x2a1/0x3f0 net/socket.c:2530 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2559 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2568 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2566 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x367/0x540 net/socket.c:2566 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd It is because icmp6hdr does not in skb linear region under the scenario of SOCK_RAW socket. Access icmp6_hdr(skb)->icmp6_type directly will trigger the uninit variable access bug. Use a local variable icmp6_type to carry the correct value in different scenarios.

Published Dec 30, 2025 · Updated Oct 13, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: Linux

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+2

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
0.21%
ahead of 10% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026
Affects
Linux
Linux
CVSS base
—
Score not published yet.

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux).
  2. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  3. Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Linux Linux ≥ 14878f75abd5bf1d38becb405801cd491ee215dc and < 165370522cc48127da564a08584a7391e6341908≥ 14878f75abd5bf1d38becb405801cd491ee215dc and < f394f690a30a5ec0413c62777a058eaf3d6e10d5≥ 14878f75abd5bf1d38becb405801cd491ee215dc and < 0cf600ca1bdf1d52df977516ee6cee0cadb1f6b1≥ 14878f75abd5bf1d38becb405801cd491ee215dc and < 605b056d63302ae84eb136e88d4df49124bd5e0d≥ 14878f75abd5bf1d38becb405801cd491ee215dc and < d65ff2fe877c471aa6e79efa7bd8ff66e147c317≥ 14878f75abd5bf1d38becb405801cd491ee215dc and < 2c9cefc142c1dc2759e19a92d3b2b3715e985beb≥ 14878f75abd5bf1d38becb405801cd491ee215dc and < 02ed5700f40445af02d1c97db25ffc2d04971d9f≥ 14878f75abd5bf1d38becb405801cd491ee215dc and < ea30388baebcce37fd594d425a65037ca35e59e8
and 1 more version 2.6.24
Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.21%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Not enough vector or weakness data: use the affected application’s logs as a starting point.
application logs

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Record published
    Oct 13, 2026
  • Affected products added · linux/linux
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Source status changed · → Deferred
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • 2025
  • CVE published
    Dec 30, 2025 · Linux

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

8 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Linux
every CVE for this vendor

Related CVEs (same products)

  • CVE-2026-99999 ipv4: validate checksum_start before completing checksum 8h
  • CVE-2026-98432 ipv4: free inet_opt and ireq_opt after an RCU grace period 8h
  • CVE-2026-98424 wifi: cfg80211: undo netns switch if renaming the wiphy fails 1d
  • CVE-2026-98425 wifi: mac80211: don't warn when an IBSS has no channel to scan 1d
  • CVE-2026-98426 wifi: mwifiex: fix IRQ leak using wrong index in MSI-X error path 1d
  • CVE-2026-98427 net/sched: codel: bound the dropping loop per dequeue call 1d

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No CVSS score published by NVD, the CNA, CISA or GitHub so far.
  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No CISA SSVC assessment.
  • No CWE classification.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2023-54265 is "ipv6: Fix an uninit variable access bug in __ip6_make_skb()", rated Unknown. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. EPSS 0.21% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.