High
Memory corruption exploit reference
CVE-2024-12085 — Rsync: info leak via uninitialized stack contents
A flaw was found in rsync which could be triggered when rsync compares file checksums. This flaw allows an attacker to manipulate the checksum length (s2length) to cause a comparison between a checksum and uninitialized memory and leak one byte of uninitialized stack data at a time.
28
Moderate
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 8.8% (30-day exploitation probability)+14
- Technical severity (high)+6
- CISA SSVC: exploitation "poc"+5
- Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
8.82%
ahead of 95% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026
Affects
Almalinux
Almalinux and 47 more
CVSS base
7.5
High · 2 source(s)
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
Proof of concept
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
Yes
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Almalinux Almalinux, Archlinux Arch Linux, Gentoo Linux…).
- The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- EPSS ahead of 95% of scored CVEs: prioritize it in the patch queue.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (memory corruption), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almalinux | Almalinux | version 10.0version 9.0version 8.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Archlinux | Arch Linux | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Gentoo | Linux | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Nixos | Nixos | < 24.11 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Compliance Operator 1 | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux | version 9.0version 8.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux Eus | version 8.8version 9.2version 9.4version 9.6 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux For Arm 64 | version 9.2_aarch64version 8.0_aarch64version 9.0_aarch64 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux For Arm 64 Eus | version 8.8_aarch64version 9.4_aarch64version 9.6_aarch64 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux For Ibm Z Systems | version 8.0_s390xversion 9.0_s390xversion 9.2_s390x | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux For Ibm Z Systems Eus | version 9.4_s390xversion 8.8_s390xversion 9.6_s390x | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux For Power Little Endian | version 8.0_ppc64leversion 8.8_ppc64leversion 9.0_ppc64leversion 9.2_ppc64le | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux For Power Little Endian Eus | version 9.4_ppc64leversion 9.6_ppc64le | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux Server | version 7.0version 6.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux Server Aus | version 8.4version 8.2version 9.6version 8.6version 9.2version 9.4 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux Server For Power Little Endian Update Services For Sap Solutions | version 9.6_ppc64leversion 9.4_ppc64leversion 9.2_ppc64leversion 9.0_ppc64leversion 8.4_ppc64leversion 8.6_ppc64leversion 8.8_ppc64le | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux Server Tus | version 8.4version 8.8version 8.6 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux Update Services For Sap Solutions | version 9.6version 9.2version 9.0version 8.6version 8.4 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Openshift | version 5.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Openshift Container Platform | version 4.17version 4.12version 4.14version 4.16version 4.15version 4.13 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Extended Lifecycle Support - EXTENSION | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Telecommunications Update Service | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Update Services for SAP Solutions | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12 | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.13 | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14 | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15 | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16 | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17 | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18 | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.9-RHEL-9 | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Samba | Rsync | < 3.3.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| SUSE | Suse Linux | versions not specified by the source | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Tritondatacenter | Smartos | < 20250123 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | CVSS 3.1 | High | 3.9 | 3.6 | secalert@redhat.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 7.5 | CVSS 3.1 | High | — | — | redhat via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N (score shown at the top: secalert@redhat.com) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 8.82%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
- Correlate service crashes/restarts with inbound traffic; repeated crashes may indicate attempts.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Affected products removed · 2
- Affected products added · red hat/compliance operator 1
- Affected products removed · 1
- Affected products added · red hat/openshift compliance operator 1, red hat/red hat openshift container platform 4
- Affected products added · red hat/red hat enterprise linux 10, red hat/red hat enterprise linux 6 extended lifecycle support - extension, red hat/
- SSVC assessment updated
- Record published
- CVSS changed · 7.5
- Source status changed · → Modified
- Record created in this database
- 2025
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
References
29 on the record
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0885
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2701
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0774
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0884
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0637
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0688
- kb.cert.org/vuls/id/952657
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-12085
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1225
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1123
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1242
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0790
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:6470
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0325
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1128
- github.com/google/security-research/security/advisories/GHSA-p5pg-x43v-mvqj
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00008.html
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1227
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0324
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0849
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250131-0002/
- www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/952657
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0714
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1120
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6122
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0787
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21885
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1451
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Medium CVE-2026-104046 Sssd: sssd: denial of service via incomplete identity provider authentication requests 9d
- Medium CVE-2026-104045 Sssd: sssd: denial of service via race condition in autofs responder 9d
- Medium CVE-2026-104047 Sssd: sssd: information disclosure via query injection in entra id lookups 9d
- High CVE-2026-104048 Sssd: sssd: authorization bypass via cross-domain username collision in hbac evaluation 9d
- High CVE-2026-102558 Libsoup: libsoup: heap buffer overflow during websocket receive-buffer growth 16d
- High CVE-2026-102555 Libsoup: libsoup: heap buffer overflow via uninitialized length in data-uri base64 decoding 16d
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2024-12085 is "Rsync: info leak via uninitialized stack contents", rated High. It affects Almalinux (Almalinux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.5 describes technical severity. EPSS 8.82% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.