CVE Intelligence
High Denial of service

CVE-2024-3056 — Podman: kernel: containers in shared ipc namespace are vulnerable to denial of service attack

A flaw was found in Podman. This issue may allow an attacker to create a specially crafted container that, when configured to share the same IPC with at least one other container, can create a large number of IPC resources in /dev/shm. The malicious container will continue to exhaust resources until it is out-of-memory (OOM) killed. While the malicious container's cgroup will be removed, the IPC resources it created are not. Those resources are tied to the IPC namespace that will not be removed until all containers using it are stopped, and one non-malicious container is holding the namespace open. The malicious container is restarted, either automatically or by attacker control, repeating the process and increasing the amount of memory consumed. With a container configured to restart always, such as `podman run --restart=always`, this can result in a memory-based denial of service of the system.

Published Aug 2, 2024 · Updated Oct 29, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP, GitHub Security Advisories · CNA: redhat

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 0.5% (30-day exploitation probability)+7
  • Technical severity (high)+6

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
0.53%
ahead of 45% of scored CVEs · Oct 29, 2026
Affects
Fedoraproject
Fedora and 11 more
CVSS base
7.7
High · 4 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Fedoraproject Fedora, Podman Project Podman, Red Hat Enterprise Linux…).
  2. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  3. Exploitation requires user interaction: tighten email/web filtering and warn affected users.
  4. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (denial of service), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Fedoraproject Fedora version 40 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Podman Project Podman ≤ 5.2.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 8.0version 9.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Red Hat Openshift Container Platform version 4.0 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 versions not specified by the source Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 versions not specified by the source Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 versions not specified by the source Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Go Github.com/containers/podman ≤ 5.2.0 Vulnerable GitHub Security Advisories
Go Github.com/containers/podman/v2 ≤ 5.2.0 Vulnerable GitHub Security Advisories
Go Github.com/containers/podman/v3 ≤ 5.2.0 Vulnerable GitHub Security Advisories
Go Github.com/containers/podman/v4 ≤ 5.2.0 Vulnerable GitHub Security Advisories
Go Github.com/containers/podman/v5 ≤ 5.2.0 Vulnerable GitHub Security Advisories

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
7.7 CVSS 3.1 High 1.3 5.8 secalert@redhat.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
7.7 CVSS 3.1 High — — redhat via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
4.8 CVSS 3.1 Medium 1.2 3.6 nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
4.8 CVSS 3.1 Medium — — GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:H (score shown at the top: secalert@redhat.com)
Scoring entities (NIST, CNA, ADP) score independently; each score is shown with its origin. For prioritization we use 7.7 (secalert@redhat.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database) as a conservative provisional reference — not a definitive official score.

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 28, 2026 → Oct 29, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.55%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
  • Track CPU/memory spikes and availability drops correlated with request patterns.
web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPSresource metrics

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Affected products added · go/github.com/containers/podman/v5, go/github.com/containers/podman, go/github.com/containers/podman/v2, go/github.com/c
    Oct 29, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisories
  • Affected products added · red hat/red hat enterprise linux 10, red hat/red hat enterprise linux 8, red hat/red hat enterprise linux 9
    Oct 29, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 29, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 29, 2026
  • Affected products added · podman project/podman, redhat/openshift container platform, redhat/enterprise linux, fedoraproject/fedora
    Oct 29, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVSS changed · 7.7
    Oct 29, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Modified
    Oct 29, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 29, 2026 · Alertas do Telegram
  • 2024
  • CVE published
    Aug 2, 2024 · redhat

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 2× References added · Oct 29, 2026 – Oct 29, 2026
  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 29, 2026 – Oct 29, 2026

References

7 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Fedoraproject
every CVE for this vendor
CWE-400
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • High CVE-2026-119777 Gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free: stack buffer overflow in h.266/vvc parser 32m
  • High CVE-2026-119528 Gimp: gimp: stack buffer overflow in psd image resource header loader 4h
  • Low CVE-2026-115456 Gcc: out-of-bounds read in std::from_chars 9h
  • Medium CVE-2026-114690 Gcc: confirmed out-of-bounds read/write in libstdc++ parallel `std 10h
  • Medium CVE-2026-115455 Gcc: stack overflow in std::bitset on libstdc++ 10h
  • Medium CVE-2026-114691 Gcc: integer wrap in `std 10h

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2024-3056 is "Podman: kernel: containers in shared ipc namespace are vulnerable to denial of service attack", rated High. It affects Fedora (Fedoraproject); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.7 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.53% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.