CVE Intelligence
Medium

CVE-2024-50095 — RDMA/mad: Improve handling of timed out WRs of mad agent

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/mad: Improve handling of timed out WRs of mad agent Current timeout handler of mad agent acquires/releases mad_agent_priv lock for every timed out WRs. This causes heavy locking contention when higher no. of WRs are to be handled inside timeout handler. This leads to softlockup with below trace in some use cases where rdma-cm path is used to establish connection between peer nodes Trace: ----- BUG: soft lockup - CPU#4 stuck for 26s! [kworker/u128:3:19767] CPU: 4 PID: 19767 Comm: kworker/u128:3 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE ------- --- 5.14.0-427.13.1.el9_4.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R740/01YM03, BIOS 2.4.8 11/26/2019 Workqueue: ib_mad1 timeout_sends [ib_core] RIP: 0010:__do_softirq+0x78/0x2ac RSP: 0018:ffffb253449e4f98 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: 00000000ffffffff RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000000000001f RDX: 000000000000001d RSI: 000000003d1879ab RDI: fff363b66fd3a86b RBP: ffffb253604cbcd8 R08: 0000009065635f3b R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000040 R11: ffffb253449e4ff8 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000040 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8caa1fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fd9ec9db900 CR3: 0000000891934006 CR4: 00000000007706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1c4/0x2df ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1c4/0x2df ? __irq_exit_rcu+0xa1/0xc0 ? watchdog_timer_fn+0x1b2/0x210 ? __pfx_watchdog_timer_fn+0x10/0x10 ? __hrtimer_run_queues+0x127/0x2c0 ? hrtimer_interrupt+0xfc/0x210 ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5c/0x110 ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x37/0x90 ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 ? __do_softirq+0x78/0x2ac ? __do_softirq+0x60/0x2ac __irq_exit_rcu+0xa1/0xc0 sysvec_call_function_single+0x72/0x90 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x16/0x20 RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x14/0x30 RSP: 0018:ffffb253604cbd88 EFLAGS: 00000247 RAX: 000000000001960d RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: ffff8cad2a064800 RDX: 000000008020001b RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8cad5d39f66c RBP: ffff8cad5d39f600 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff8caa443e0c00 R11: ffffb253604cbcd8 R12: ffff8cacb8682538 R13: 0000000000000005 R14: ffffb253604cbd90 R15: ffff8cad5d39f66c cm_process_send_error+0x122/0x1d0 [ib_cm] timeout_sends+0x1dd/0x270 [ib_core] process_one_work+0x1e2/0x3b0 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 worker_thread+0x50/0x3a0 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xdd/0x100 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50 </TASK> Simplified timeout handler by creating local list of timed out WRs and invoke send handler post creating the list. The new method acquires/ releases lock once to fetch the list and hence helps to reduce locking contetiong when processing higher no. of WRs

Published Nov 5, 2024 · Updated Oct 14, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP, GitHub Security Advisories · CNA: Linux

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 0.7% (30-day exploitation probability)+8
  • Technical severity (medium)+3

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
0.74%
ahead of 54% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026
Affects
Linux
Linux and 1 more
CVSS base
5.5
Medium · 6 source(s)
Prioritization reference: 7.5 provisional

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

  • Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
  • Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux, Linux Linux Kernel).
  2. Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
  3. Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Linux Linux ≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < 713adaf0ecfc49405f6e5d9e409d984f628de818≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < 7022a517bf1ca37ef5a474365bcc5eafd345a13a≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < e80eadb3604a92d2d086e956b8b2692b699d4d0a≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < a195a42dd25ca4f12489687065d00be64939409f≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < 3e799fa463508abe7a738ce5d0f62a8dfd05262a≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < 2a777679b8ccd09a9a65ea0716ef10365179caacversion 2.6.12 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Linux Linux Kernel < 5.10.227≥ 5.11 and < 5.15.168≥ 5.16 and < 6.1.113≥ 6.2 and < 6.6.57≥ 6.7 and < 6.11.4 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
7.5 CVSS 3.1 High 3.9 3.6 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 via NIST National Vulnerability Database
7.5 CVSS 3.1 High — — Linux via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
5.5 CVSS 3.1 Medium 1.8 3.6 nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
5.5 CVSS 3.1 Medium 1.8 3.6 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0 via NIST National Vulnerability Database
5.5 CVSS 3.1 Medium — — GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories
5.5 CVSS 3.1 Medium — — CISA-ADP via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov)
Scoring entities (NIST, CNA, ADP) score independently; each score is shown with its origin. For prioritization we use 7.5 (416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 via NIST National Vulnerability Database) as a conservative provisional reference — not a definitive official score.

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Local/physical vector: focus on endpoint telemetry (EDR) from affected hosts.
endpoint telemetry (EDR)

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Affected products added · linux/linux
    Oct 14, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 14, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 14, 2026
  • Fix documented
    Oct 14, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVSS changed · 5.5
    Oct 14, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Modified
    Oct 14, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 14, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • 2024
  • CVE published
    Nov 5, 2024 · Linux

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× References added · Oct 14, 2026 – Oct 14, 2026
  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 14, 2026 – Oct 14, 2026

References

12 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Linux
every CVE for this vendor

Related CVEs (same products)

  • CVE-2026-99999 ipv4: validate checksum_start before completing checksum 8h
  • CVE-2026-98432 ipv4: free inet_opt and ireq_opt after an RCU grace period 8h
  • CVE-2026-98424 wifi: cfg80211: undo netns switch if renaming the wiphy fails 1d
  • CVE-2026-98425 wifi: mac80211: don't warn when an IBSS has no channel to scan 1d
  • CVE-2026-98426 wifi: mwifiex: fix IRQ leak using wrong index in MSI-X error path 1d
  • CVE-2026-98427 net/sched: codel: bound the dropping loop per dequeue call 1d

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No CWE classification.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2024-50095 is "RDMA/mad: Improve handling of timed out WRs of mad agent", rated Medium. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 5.5 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.74% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.