CVE Intelligence
High

CVE-2025-15080 — Information Disclosure, Information Tampering, and Denial of Service (DoS) Vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric proprietary protocol communication and SLMP communication for FA products

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R Series R08PCPU, R16PCPU, R32PCPU, and R120PCPU allows an unauthenticated attacker to read device data or part of a control program from the affected product, write device data in the affected product, or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on the affected product by sending a specially crafted packet containing a specific command to the affected product.

Published Feb 5, 2026 · Updated Oct 13, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: Mitsubishi

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 0.6% (30-day exploitation probability)+7
  • Technical severity (high)+6
  • Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
0.61%
ahead of 48% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026
Affects
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
MELSEC iQ-R Series R08PCPU and 3 more
CVSS base
8.8
High · 2 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
Yes
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series R08PCPU, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series R120PCPU, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series R16PCPU…).
  2. The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
  3. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  4. Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series R08PCPU version Firmware versions "48" and prior Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series R120PCPU version Firmware versions "48" and prior Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series R16PCPU version Firmware versions "48" and prior Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series R32PCPU version Firmware versions "48" and prior Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
X
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
Low
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent)
None
Integrity (subsequent)
None
Availability (subsequent)
None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
8.8 CVSS 4.0 High — — Mitsubishielectric.Psirt@yd.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp via NIST National Vulnerability Database
8.8 CVSS 4.0 High — — Mitsubishi via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X (score shown at the top: Mitsubishielectric.Psirt@yd.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-1284

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.61%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPS

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Affected products added · mitsubishi electric corporation/melsec iq-r series r08pcpu, mitsubishi electric corporation/melsec iq-r series r16pcpu,
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 13, 2026
  • CVSS changed · 8.8
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Deferred
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVE published
    Feb 5, 2026 · Mitsubishi

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

3 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
every CVE for this vendor
CWE-1284
other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2025-15080 is "Information Disclosure, Information Tampering, and Denial of Service (DoS) Vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric proprietary protocol communication and SLMP communication for FA products", rated High. It affects MELSEC iQ-R Series R08PCPU (Mitsubishi Electric Corporation); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 8.8 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.61% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.