CVE Intelligence
Medium Access control exploit reference

CVE-2025-15106 — getmaxun Authentication Endpoint auth.ts router.get improper authorization

A weakness has been identified in getmaxun maxun up to 0.0.28. The affected element is the function router.get of the file server/src/routes/auth.ts of the component Authentication Endpoint. Executing manipulation can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published Dec 27, 2025 · Updated Oct 13, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: VulDB

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 0.4% (30-day exploitation probability)+4
  • Technical severity (medium)+3
  • CISA SSVC: exploitation "poc"+5
  • Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
0.36%
ahead of 29% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026
Affects
Getmaxun
Maxun
CVSS base
4.3
Medium · 3 source(s)
Prioritization reference: 6.3 provisional

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
Proof of concept
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
Yes
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Getmaxun Maxun, Maxun Maxun).
  2. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  3. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (access control), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Getmaxun Maxun version 0.0.14version 0.0.28version 0.0.27version 0.0.26version 0.0.25version 0.0.24version 0.0.23version 0.0.22
and 20 more version 0.0.21version 0.0.20version 0.0.19version 0.0.18version 0.0.17version 0.0.16version 0.0.15version 0.0.13version 0.0.12version 0.0.11version 0.0.10version 0.0.9version 0.0.8version 0.0.7version 0.0.6version 0.0.5version 0.0.4version 0.0.3version 0.0.2version 0.0.1
Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Maxun Maxun ≤ 0.0.28 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
5.3 CVSS 4.0 Medium — — VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
2.1 CVSS 4.0 Low — — cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
6.3 CVSS 3.1 Medium 2.8 3.4 cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
6.3 CVSS 3.1 Medium — — VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
4.3 CVSS 3.1 Medium 2.8 1.4 nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
6.3 CVSS 3.0 Medium — — VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
6.5 CVSS 2.0 Medium 8.0 6.4 cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
6.5 CVSS 2.0 Medium — — VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov)
Scoring entities (NIST, CNA, ADP) score independently; each score is shown with its origin. For prioritization we use 6.3 (cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database) as a conservative provisional reference — not a definitive official score.

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (IDOR)

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.36%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
  • Audit administrative actions and access to resources outside each user’s normal pattern.
web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPSauthentication logsapplication logs

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Affected products added · getmaxun/maxun
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 13, 2026
  • CVSS changed · 4.3
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Analyzed
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • 2025
  • CVE published
    Dec 27, 2025 · VulDB

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

4 on the record

  • vuldb.com/
    Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry, third-party-advisory, NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • vuldb.com/
    Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry, vdb-entry, technical-description, NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • vuldb.com/
    Permissions Required, VDB Entry, signature, permissions-required, NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • gist.github.com/H2u8s/1a0bdb19d5c8c8f4dc72cb49ffe9a22b
    Exploit, exploit, NIST National Vulnerability Database

Elsewhere on this site

Getmaxun
every CVE for this vendor
Access control
same class
CWE-639
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • High CVE-2026-56767 Maxun < 0.0.42 - Cross-Tenant IDOR in Storage and Webhook API Handlers Jun 25, 2026
  • Medium CVE-2025-15105 getmaxun auth.ts hard-coded key Dec 27, 2025

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2025-15106 is "getmaxun Authentication Endpoint auth.ts router.get improper authorization", rated Medium. It affects Maxun (Getmaxun); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 4.3 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.36% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.