CVE-2025-20393 — Cisco Multiple Products Improper Input Validation Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the Spam Quarantine feature of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary system commands on an affected device with root privileges. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of HTTP requests by the Spam Quarantine feature. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with root privileges.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- Confirmed exploitation (CISA KEV)+35
- Public exploit/PoC (github)+6
- EPSS 32.4% (30-day exploitation probability)+15
- Technical severity (critical)+10
- Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
CISA required action CISA
Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.
US federal deadline: Dec 24, 2025 — passed 295 day(s) ago
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Cisco Asyncos, Cisco Cisco Secure Email, Cisco Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager).
- Treat as emergency remediation: the CVE is in CISA KEV (confirmed exploitation).
- The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- EPSS ahead of 98% of scored CVEs: prioritize it in the patch queue.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (input validation), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco | Asyncos | ≥ 15.5 and < 15.5.4-012≥ 16.0 and < 16.0.4-016< 15.0.2-007≥ 15.5 and < 15.5.4-007≥ 16.0 and < 16.0.4-010< 15.0.5-016 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Cisco | Cisco Secure Email |
version 15.5.2-018version 16.0.1-017version 15.5.3-022version 16.0.0-054version 15.0.3-002version 16.0.0-050version 15.5.1-055version 15.5.0-048 and 10 moreversion 15.0.1-030version 14.3.0-032version 14.2.1-020version 15.0.0-104version 13.5.4-038version 13.0.5-007version 14.2.0-620version 13.0.0-392version 13.5.1-277version 14.0.0-698 |
Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Cisco | Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager |
version 12.8.1-021version 13.8.1-108version 14.2.0-224version 14.3.0-120version 15.0.0-334version 15.5.1-024version 15.5.1-029version 15.5.2-005 and 18 moreversion 16.0.0-195version 15.5.3-017version 16.0.1-010version 15.0.1-035version 16.0.2-088version 14.2.0-212version 14.2.0-203version 13.6.1-201version 14.1.0-227version 12.8.1-002version 14.0.0-404version 13.8.1-074version 13.8.1-068version 13.8.1-052version 13.0.0-277version 13.0.0-249version 13.6.2-078version 13.6.2-023 |
Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.0 | CVSS 3.1 | Critical | 3.9 | 6.0 | psirt@cisco.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 10.0 | CVSS 3.1 | Critical | — | — | GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories |
| 10.0 | CVSS 3.1 | Critical | — | — | cisco via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: psirt@cisco.com) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
CISA KEV details CISA
CISA lists a CVE once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.
CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a reference date.
Public exploits, PoCs and detection templates
Public code that demonstrates or tests the flaw raises the odds of mass exploitation — and Nuclei templates help find vulnerable assets in your environment.
- Cisco is aware of a potential vulnerability. Cisco is currently investigating and will update these details as appropriate as more information becomes available. ★ 2 Dec 18, 2025
- KingHacker353/CVE-2025-20393 ★ 0 Dec 18, 2025
- CVE-2025-20393 ★ 0 Dec 28, 2025
- This tool helps identify exposure to CVE-2025-20393 by checking for open TCP/6025 ports, responsive Spam Quarantine interfaces, and known post-exploitation IOCs. ★ 0 Jan 16, 2026
Warning: public PoCs are sometimes disguised malware. Use them only for authorized testing in an isolated environment. This portal does not host exploit code — it only points to the sources.
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 32.39%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
- Hunt retroactively in logs from before Dec 17, 2025 (KEV listing): exploitation may have started earlier.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Affected products added · cisco/cisco secure email, cisco/cisco secure email and web manager
- SSVC assessment updated
- Record published
- Affected products added · cisco/asyncos
- CVSS changed · 10.0
- Source status changed · → Analyzed
- Added to CISA KEV (detected)
- Record created in this database
- 2025
- CVE published
- Added to CISA KEV catalog
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 2× References added · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
References
4 on the record
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Critical CVE-2026-76519 Cisco Secure Email Gateway Relative Path Traversal Vulnerability KEV 1d
- Critical CVE-2026-76461 Cisco Secure Email Gateway SQL Injection Vulnerability KEV Sep 14, 2026
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2025-20393 is "Cisco Multiple Products Improper Input Validation Vulnerability", rated Critical. It affects Asyncos (Cisco); versions are in the scope table. It is in CISA KEV: there is evidence of real-world exploitation. CVSS 10.0 describes technical severity. EPSS 32.39% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.