CVE-2025-38181 — calipso: Fix null-ptr-deref in calipso_req_{set,del}attr().
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: calipso: Fix null-ptr-deref in calipso_req_{set,del}attr(). syzkaller reported a null-ptr-deref in sock_omalloc() while allocating a CALIPSO option. [0] The NULL is of struct sock, which was fetched by sk_to_full_sk() in calipso_req_setattr(). Since commit a1a5344ddbe8 ("tcp: avoid two atomic ops for syncookies"), reqsk->rsk_listener could be NULL when SYN Cookie is returned to its client, as hinted by the leading SYN Cookie log. Here are 3 options to fix the bug: 1) Return 0 in calipso_req_setattr() 2) Return an error in calipso_req_setattr() 3) Alaways set rsk_listener 1) is no go as it bypasses LSM, but 2) effectively disables SYN Cookie for CALIPSO. 3) is also no go as there have been many efforts to reduce atomic ops and make TCP robust against DDoS. See also commit 3b24d854cb35 ("tcp/dccp: do not touch listener sk_refcnt under synflood"). As of the blamed commit, SYN Cookie already did not need refcounting, and no one has stumbled on the bug for 9 years, so no CALIPSO user will care about SYN Cookie. Let's return an error in calipso_req_setattr() and calipso_req_delattr() in the SYN Cookie case. This can be reproduced by [1] on Fedora and now connect() of nc times out. [0]: TCP: request_sock_TCPv6: Possible SYN flooding on port [::]:20002. Sending cookies. Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000006: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000030-0x0000000000000037] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 12262 Comm: syz.1.2611 Not tainted 6.14.0 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:read_pnet include/net/net_namespace.h:406 [inline] RIP: 0010:sock_net include/net/sock.h:655 [inline] RIP: 0010:sock_kmalloc+0x35/0x170 net/core/sock.c:2806 Code: 89 d5 41 54 55 89 f5 53 48 89 fb e8 25 e3 c6 fd e8 f0 91 e3 00 48 8d 7b 30 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 26 01 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 8b RSP: 0018:ffff88811af89038 EFLAGS: 00010216 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff888105266400 RDX: 0000000000000006 RSI: ffff88800c890000 RDI: 0000000000000030 RBP: 0000000000000050 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88810526640e R10: ffffed1020a4cc81 R11: ffff88810526640f R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000820 R14: ffff888105266400 R15: 0000000000000050 FS: 00007f0653a07640(0000) GS:ffff88811af80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f863ba096f4 CR3: 00000000163c0005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 80000000 Call Trace: <IRQ> ipv6_renew_options+0x279/0x950 net/ipv6/exthdrs.c:1288 calipso_req_setattr+0x181/0x340 net/ipv6/calipso.c:1204 calipso_req_setattr+0x56/0x80 net/netlabel/netlabel_calipso.c:597 netlbl_req_setattr+0x18a/0x440 net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:1249 selinux_netlbl_inet_conn_request+0x1fb/0x320 security/selinux/netlabel.c:342 selinux_inet_conn_request+0x1eb/0x2c0 security/selinux/hooks.c:5551 security_inet_conn_request+0x50/0xa0 security/security.c:4945 tcp_v6_route_req+0x22c/0x550 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:825 tcp_conn_request+0xec8/0x2b70 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:7275 tcp_v6_conn_request+0x1e3/0x440 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:1328 tcp_rcv_state_process+0xafa/0x52b0 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6781 tcp_v6_do_rcv+0x8a6/0x1a40 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:1667 tcp_v6_rcv+0x505e/0x5b50 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:1904 ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x17c/0x1da0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:436 ip6_input_finish+0x103/0x180 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:480 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:308 [inline] ip6_input+0x13c/0x6b0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:491 dst_input include/net/dst.h:469 [inline] ip6_rcv_finish net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:79 [inline] ip6_rcv_finish+0xb6/0x490 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:69 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netf ---truncated---
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 0.6% (30-day exploitation probability)+7
- Technical severity (medium)+3
- Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
- Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
- Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
- Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
- Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
- Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
- Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
- Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
- Documented patch — git.kernel.org (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Debian Debian Linux, Linux Linux, Linux Linux Kernel).
- Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (memory corruption), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debian | Debian Linux | version 11.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Linux | Linux |
version 4.8≥ e1adea927080821ebfa7505bff752a4015955660 and < 10876da918fa1aec0227fb4c67647513447f53a9≥ e1adea927080821ebfa7505bff752a4015955660 and < d092c7fd8e220b23d6c47e03d7d0cc79e731f379≥ e1adea927080821ebfa7505bff752a4015955660 and < 988edde4d52d5c02ea4dd95d7619372a5e2fb7b7≥ e1adea927080821ebfa7505bff752a4015955660 and < bde8833eb075ba8e8674de88e32de6b669966451≥ e1adea927080821ebfa7505bff752a4015955660 and < 058dd4a370f23a5553a9449f2db53d5bfa88d45e≥ e1adea927080821ebfa7505bff752a4015955660 and < dc724bd34d56f5589f7587a091a8cda2386826c4≥ e1adea927080821ebfa7505bff752a4015955660 and < f4ae0f61dd9a63329ecb49b1e6356139d43240b8 and 1 more≥ e1adea927080821ebfa7505bff752a4015955660 and < 956f1499412ed0953f6a116df7fdb855e9f1fc66 |
Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Linux | Linux Kernel |
version 6.16-rc2version 6.16-rc1≥ 6.13 and < 6.15.4≥ 6.7 and < 6.12.35≥ 6.2 and < 6.6.95≥ 5.16 and < 6.1.142≥ 5.11 and < 5.15.186≥ 5.5 and < 5.10.239 and 1 more≥ 4.8 and < 5.4.295 |
Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | CVSS 3.1 | High | 3.9 | 3.6 | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 7.5 | CVSS 3.1 | High | — | — | Linux via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| 5.5 | CVSS 3.1 | Medium | 1.8 | 3.6 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 5.5 | CVSS 3.1 | Medium | — | — | GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Local/physical vector: focus on endpoint telemetry (EDR) from affected hosts.
- Correlate service crashes/restarts with inbound traffic; repeated crashes may indicate attempts.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Affected products added · linux/linux
- SSVC assessment updated
- Record published
- Fix documented
- Affected products added · linux/linux kernel, debian/debian linux
- CVSS changed · 5.5
- Source status changed · → Modified
- Record created in this database
- 2025
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 2× References added · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026
References
12 on the record
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/956f1499412ed0953f6a116df7fdb855e9f1fc66
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/bde8833eb075ba8e8674de88e32de6b669966451
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/d092c7fd8e220b23d6c47e03d7d0cc79e731f379
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/10876da918fa1aec0227fb4c67647513447f53a9
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/058dd4a370f23a5553a9449f2db53d5bfa88d45e
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/f4ae0f61dd9a63329ecb49b1e6356139d43240b8
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/dc724bd34d56f5589f7587a091a8cda2386826c4
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/988edde4d52d5c02ea4dd95d7619372a5e2fb7b7
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00007.html
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00008.html
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38181
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-5hp5-2vg6-w8h9
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Critical CVE-2026-99999 ipv4: validate checksum_start before completing checksum 15h
- Unknown CVE-2026-98432 ipv4: free inet_opt and ireq_opt after an RCU grace period 15h
- Unknown CVE-2026-98424 wifi: cfg80211: undo netns switch if renaming the wiphy fails 1d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98425 wifi: mac80211: don't warn when an IBSS has no channel to scan 1d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98426 wifi: mwifiex: fix IRQ leak using wrong index in MSI-X error path 1d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98427 net/sched: codel: bound the dropping loop per dequeue call 1d
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2025-38181 is "calipso: Fix null-ptr-deref in calipso_req_{set,del}attr().", rated Medium. It affects Debian Linux (Debian); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 5.5 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.56% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.