CVE Intelligence
Unknown

CVE-2025-40052 — smb: client: fix crypto buffers in non-linear memory

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix crypto buffers in non-linear memory The crypto API, through the scatterlist API, expects input buffers to be in linear memory. We handle this with the cifs_sg_set_buf() helper that converts vmalloc'd memory to their corresponding pages. However, when we allocate our aead_request buffer (@creq in smb2ops.c::crypt_message()), we do so with kvzalloc(), which possibly puts aead_request->__ctx in vmalloc area. AEAD algorithm then uses ->__ctx for its private/internal data and operations, and uses sg_set_buf() for such data on a few places. This works fine as long as @creq falls into kmalloc zone (small requests) or vmalloc'd memory is still within linear range. Tasks' stacks are vmalloc'd by default (CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y), so too many tasks will increment the base stacks' addresses to a point where virt_addr_valid(buf) will fail (BUG() in sg_set_buf()) when that happens. In practice: too many parallel reads and writes on an encrypted mount will trigger this bug. To fix this, always alloc @creq with kmalloc() instead. Also drop the @sensitive_size variable/arguments since kfree_sensitive() doesn't need it. Backtrace: [ 945.272081] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 945.272774] kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:209! [ 945.273520] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI [ 945.274412] CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 56 Comm: kworker/u33:0 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.15.0-lku-11779-g8e9d6efccdd7-dirty #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) [ 945.275736] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-2-gc13ff2cd-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 945.276877] Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-cifs-2) [ 945.277457] RIP: 0010:crypto_gcm_init_common+0x1f9/0x220 [ 945.278018] Code: b0 00 00 00 48 83 c4 08 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc 48 c7 c0 00 00 00 80 48 2b 05 5c 58 e5 00 e9 58 ff ff ff <0f> 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 48 c7 04 24 01 00 00 00 48 8b [ 945.279992] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000a27360 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 945.280578] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc90001d85060 RCX: 0000000000000030 [ 945.281376] RDX: 0000000000080000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffc90081d85070 [ 945.282145] RBP: ffffc90001d85010 R08: ffffc90001d85000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 945.282898] R10: ffffc90001d85090 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffffc90001d85070 [ 945.283656] R13: ffff888113522948 R14: ffffc90001d85060 R15: ffffc90001d85010 [ 945.284407] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8882e66cf000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 945.285262] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 945.285884] CR2: 00007fa7ffdd31f4 CR3: 000000010540d000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 [ 945.286683] Call Trace: [ 945.286952] <TASK> [ 945.287184] ? crypt_message+0x33f/0xad0 [cifs] [ 945.287719] crypto_gcm_encrypt+0x36/0xe0 [ 945.288152] crypt_message+0x54a/0xad0 [cifs] [ 945.288724] smb3_init_transform_rq+0x277/0x300 [cifs] [ 945.289300] smb_send_rqst+0xa3/0x160 [cifs] [ 945.289944] cifs_call_async+0x178/0x340 [cifs] [ 945.290514] ? __pfx_smb2_writev_callback+0x10/0x10 [cifs] [ 945.291177] smb2_async_writev+0x3e3/0x670 [cifs] [ 945.291759] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [ 945.292212] ? netfs_advance_write+0xf2/0x310 [ 945.292723] netfs_advance_write+0xf2/0x310 [ 945.293210] netfs_write_folio+0x346/0xcc0 [ 945.293689] ? __pfx__raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x10/0x10 [ 945.294250] netfs_writepages+0x117/0x460 [ 945.294724] do_writepages+0xbe/0x170 [ 945.295152] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [ 945.295600] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x11/0x20 [ 945.296103] __writeback_single_inode+0x56/0x4b0 [ 945.296643] writeback_sb_inodes+0x229/0x550 [ 945.297140] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x4c/0xe0 [ 945.297642] wb_writeback+0x2f1/0x3f0 [ 945.298069] wb_workfn+0x300/0x490 [ 945.298472] process_one_work+0x1fe/0x590 [ 945.298949] worker_thread+0x1ce/0x3c0 [ 945.299397] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 945.299900] kthr ---truncated---

Published Oct 28, 2025 · Updated Oct 13, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: Linux

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+2

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
0.22%
ahead of 11% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026
Affects
Linux
Linux
CVSS base
—
Score not published yet.

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux).
  2. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  3. Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Linux Linux ≥ d08089f649a0cfb2099c8551ac47eef0cc23fdf2 and < ba905a567105dde21cdb8e6d3a87110fa434b393≥ d08089f649a0cfb2099c8551ac47eef0cc23fdf2 and < 7a8a8c15468f0c99685e9964451feffd1a3cc859≥ d08089f649a0cfb2099c8551ac47eef0cc23fdf2 and < 4a61b68abd2788db0364c9a0b6a39f1699fea440≥ d08089f649a0cfb2099c8551ac47eef0cc23fdf2 and < 998a67b954680f26f3734040aeeed08642d49721version 6.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.22%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Not enough vector or weakness data: use the affected application’s logs as a starting point.
application logs

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Record published
    Oct 13, 2026
  • Affected products added · linux/linux
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Source status changed · → Deferred
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • 2025
  • CVE published
    Oct 28, 2025 · Linux

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

4 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Linux
every CVE for this vendor

Related CVEs (same products)

  • CVE-2026-99999 ipv4: validate checksum_start before completing checksum 10h
  • CVE-2026-98432 ipv4: free inet_opt and ireq_opt after an RCU grace period 10h
  • CVE-2026-98424 wifi: cfg80211: undo netns switch if renaming the wiphy fails 1d
  • CVE-2026-98425 wifi: mac80211: don't warn when an IBSS has no channel to scan 1d
  • CVE-2026-98426 wifi: mwifiex: fix IRQ leak using wrong index in MSI-X error path 1d
  • CVE-2026-98427 net/sched: codel: bound the dropping loop per dequeue call 1d

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No CVSS score published by NVD, the CNA, CISA or GitHub so far.
  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No CISA SSVC assessment.
  • No CWE classification.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2025-40052 is "smb: client: fix crypto buffers in non-linear memory", rated Unknown. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. EPSS 0.22% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.