Critical Memory corruption

CVE-2025-58750 — rAthena missing bound check in chclif_parse_moveCharSlot

rAthena is an open-source cross-platform massively multiplayer online role playing game (MMORPG) server. Versions prior to commit 0cc348b are missing a bound check in `chclif_parse_moveCharSlot` that can result in reading and writing out of bounds using input from the user. The problem has been fixed in commit 0cc348b.

Published Sep 9, 2025 · Updated Oct 19, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: GitHub_M

Low

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.

How the score was calculated

EPSS 0.3% (30-day exploitation probability)+3
Technical severity (critical)+10
Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation

Not confirmed

Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.

EPSS FIRST

0.3%

ahead of 21% of scored CVEs · Oct 19, 2026

Affects

Rathena

CVSS base

9.1

Critical · 3 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script the kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

Documented patch — github.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Rathena Rathena).
The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (memory corruption), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

Vendor	Product	Versions	Status	Source
Rathena	Rathena	< 2025-09-06	Vulnerable	NIST National Vulnerability Database
Rathena	Rathena	version < 0cc348b	Vulnerable	CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector

Network

Attack complexity

Low

Privileges required

None

User interaction

None

Scope

Unchanged

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Availability

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Score	Version	Severity	Expl.	Impact	Scored by
9.1	CVSS 3.1	Critical	3.9	5.2	nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
8.2	CVSS 3.1	High	3.9	4.2	security-advisories@github.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
8.2	CVSS 3.1	High	—	—	GitHub_M via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov)

Scoring entities (NIST, CNA, ADP) score independently; each score is shown with its origin. For prioritization we use 9.1 (NVD (NIST)) as a conservative provisional reference — not a definitive official score.

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

Other CVEs with this weakness →

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
Correlate service crashes/restarts with inbound traffic; repeated crashes may indicate attempts.

web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPSendpoint telemetry (EDR)crash dumps

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

2026
Affected products added · rathena/rathena
Oct 19, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
SSVC assessment updated
Oct 19, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Record published
Oct 19, 2026
Fix documented
Oct 19, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
Affected products added · rathena/rathena
Oct 19, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
CVSS changed · 9.1
Oct 19, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
Source status changed · → Analyzed
Oct 19, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
Record created in this database
Oct 19, 2026 · Alertas do Telegram
2025
CVE published
Sep 9, 2025 · GitHub_M

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

1× References added · Oct 19, 2026 – Oct 19, 2026
1× Official description updated · Oct 19, 2026 – Oct 19, 2026

References

2 on the record

github.com/rathena/rathena/security/advisories/GHSA-pjh7-jgr8-4ff6
Vendor Advisory, x_refsource_CONFIRM, NIST National Vulnerability Database
github.com/rathena/rathena/commit/0cc348b186bbcc3c604c17c39589a319f27d469b
Patch, x_refsource_MISC, NIST National Vulnerability Database

Elsewhere on this site

Rathena
every CVE for this vendor

Memory corruption
same class

CWE-125
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

High CVE-2025-62170 rAthena map-server use-after-free vulnerability in RODEX Oct 13, 2025
Critical CVE-2025-58447 rAthena has heap-based buffer overflow in login server Sep 9, 2025
Critical CVE-2025-58448 rAthena has SQL Injection in PartyBooking component via `WorldName` parameter. Sep 9, 2025

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2025-58750 is "rAthena missing bound check in chclif_parse_moveCharSlot", rated Critical. It affects Rathena (Rathena); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 9.1 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.30% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.