CVE-2025-8848 — HTML Injection in Accept-Language Header in danny-avila/librechat
A vulnerability in danny-avila/librechat version 0.7.9 allows for HTML injection via the Accept-Language header. When a logged-in user sends an HTTP GET request with a crafted Accept-Language header, arbitrary HTML can be injected into the <html lang=""> tag of the response. This can lead to potential security risks such as cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- Public exploit/PoC (nuclei)+4
- EPSS 0.5% (30-day exploitation probability)+6
- Technical severity (medium)+3
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Danny-avila Danny-avila/librechat, Librechat Librechat).
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- Exploitation requires user interaction: tighten email/web filtering and warn affected users.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (cross-site scripting), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danny-avila | Danny-avila/librechat | ≤ latest | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Librechat | Librechat | version 0.7.9 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | CVSS 3.1 | Medium | 2.3 | 2.7 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 4.8 | CVSS 3.0 | Medium | 1.7 | 2.7 | security@huntr.dev via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 4.8 | CVSS 3.0 | Medium | — | — | GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories |
| 4.8 | CVSS 3.0 | Medium | — | — | @huntr_ai via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
Public exploits, PoCs and detection templates
Public code that demonstrates or tests the flaw raises the odds of mass exploitation — and Nuclei templates help find vulnerable assets in your environment.
Warning: public PoCs are sometimes disguised malware. Use them only for authorized testing in an isolated environment. This portal does not host exploit code — it only points to the sources.
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.45%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
- Monitor CSP violation reports and script payloads in reflected parameters.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Affected products added · danny-avila/danny-avila/librechat
- SSVC assessment updated
- Record published
- CVSS changed · 5.4
- Source status changed · → Analyzed
- Record created in this database
- 2025
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× References added · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
References
3 on the record
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- High CVE-2026-54040 LibreChat: 2FA Backup Code Regeneration Without OTP Verification Allows 2FA Bypass Jun 25, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-54037 LibreChat: Incomplete Fix for CVE-2025-7105 — /api/convos/duplicate Lacks Rate Limiting Applied to /api/convos/fork Jun 25, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-54027 LibreChat: Image Upload Route Bypasses Agent Permission Check — Incomplete Fix for File Upload Authorization Jun 25, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-54029 LibreChat: IDOR in Message Deletion — Incomplete Fix for CVE-2024-41703 Leaves deleteMessages() Without User Filter Jun 25, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-54025 LibreChat: Stored XSS via unescaped image alt text in markdown artifact preview Jun 25, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-54024 LibreChat: Incomplete Fix for CVE-2024-11171 — Conversation Import Multer Instance Missing File Size Limits Jun 25, 2026
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2025-8848 is "HTML Injection in Accept-Language Header in danny-avila/librechat", rated Medium. It affects Danny-avila/librechat (Danny-avila); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 5.4 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.45% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.