CVE-2025-9906 — Arbitrary Code execution in Keras Safe Mode
The Keras Model.load_model method can be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True. One can create a specially crafted .keras model archive that, when loaded via Model.load_model, will trigger arbitrary code to be executed. This is achieved by crafting a special config.json (a file within the .keras archive) that will invoke keras.config.enable_unsafe_deserialization() to disable safe mode. Once safe mode is disable, one can use the Lambda layer feature of keras, which allows arbitrary Python code in the form of pickled code. Both can appear in the same archive. Simply the keras.config.enable_unsafe_deserialization() needs to appear first in the archive and the Lambda with arbitrary code needs to be second.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+1
- Technical severity (high)+6
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
- Pip Keras: fixed in version 3.11.0 — github.com (GitHub Security Advisories)
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Keras Keras, Keras-team Keras-team/keras, Pip Keras).
- Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
- Exploitation requires user interaction: tighten email/web filtering and warn affected users.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (insecure deserialization), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keras | Keras | ≥ 3.0.0 and < 3.11.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| Keras-team | Keras-team/keras | ≥ 3.0.0 and < 3.11.0 | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Pip | Keras | < 3.11.0 | Vulnerable | GitHub Security Advisories |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | CVSS 4.0 | High | — | — | cve-coordination@google.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 8.6 | CVSS 4.0 | High | — | — | Google via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| 7.3 | CVSS 3.1 | High | 1.3 | 5.9 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 7.3 | CVSS 3.1 | High | — | — | GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 19, 2026 → Oct 20, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.20%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Local/physical vector: focus on endpoint telemetry (EDR) from affected hosts.
- Monitor serialized objects in requests and unexpected processes spawned by the runtime.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Fix documented
- Affected products added · pip/keras
- Affected products added · keras-team/keras
- SSVC assessment updated
- Record published
- Affected products added · keras/keras
- CVSS changed · 7.3
- Source status changed · → Analyzed
- Record created in this database
- 2025
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 2× References added · Oct 19, 2026 – Oct 19, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 19, 2026 – Oct 19, 2026
References
7 on the record
- github.com/keras-team/keras/pull/21429
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-36fq-jgmw-4r9c
- osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-9906
- github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/keras/PYSEC-2025-76.yaml
- github.com/keras-team/keras/releases/tag/v3.11.0
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9906
- github.com/keras-team/keras/commit/713172ab56b864e59e2aa79b1a51b0e728bba858
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Medium CVE-2026-12570 Denial of Service via HDF5 Shape Bomb in keras.models.load_model() in keras-team/keras Aug 10, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-9335 Improper Handling of HDF5 ExternalLinks in keras-team/keras Aug 2, 2026
- High CVE-2026-12484 Unsafe Deserialization in keras.layers.TorchModuleWrapper.from_config Jul 19, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-12482 Path Traversal via Symlink Name Validation Bypass in keras-team/keras Jul 14, 2026
- Critical CVE-2026-12481 Deserialization of Untrusted Data in keras-team/keras Jul 3, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-12480 Arbitrary HDF5 File Read via Virtual Dataset Bypass in keras-team/keras Jul 1, 2026
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2025-9906 is "Arbitrary Code execution in Keras Safe Mode", rated High. It affects Keras (Keras); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.3 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.20% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.