CVE-2026-111440 — JDBC LogFactory 任意类加载/构造导致潜在 RCE
在 openGauss-connector-jdbc 的 pgjdbc/src/main/java/org/postgresql/log/LogFactory.java 中,LogFactory 根据 JDBC 连接参数中的 logger 类名调用 Class.forName 加载类后,直接反射调用以 String 为参数的构造函数,再转换为 Log。缺少 asSubclass(Log.class) 校验,非 Log 实现类也会在类型检查前被实例化。因此,当攻击者可控制 JDBC URL 或连接属性中的 logger 类名,且客户端 classpath 中存在可被加载的类时,可能在客户端触发非预期的类加载与构造副作用。 此漏洞自 JDBC 1.1.0引入,影响 1.1.0 及之后的 2.x、3.x、5.x、6.x 各版本及补丁(含 6.0.0 分支最新 6.0.6),以及 7.0.0-RC1、7.0.0-RC2、7.0.0-RC3,并在 7.0.0-LTS 版本修复。修复在 Class.forName 之后先执行 asSubclass(Log.class),仅允许 Log 子类进入构造。修复pr见https://gitcode.com/opengauss/openGauss-connector-jdbc/pull/423。
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+2
- Technical severity (high)+6
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (openGauss-server openGauss-connector-jdbc).
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| openGauss-server | openGauss-connector-jdbc |
version 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.1.0version 2.0.0, 2.1.0version 3.0.0-3.0.5version 5.0.0-5.0.3version 5.1.0version 5.0.0-RC1version 6.0.0-RC1version 6.0.0-6.0.6 and 2 moreversion 7.0.0-RC1, 7.0.0-RC2, 7.0.0-RC3version 3.1.0-3.1.1 |
Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | CVSS 3.1 | High | 1.0 | 5.9 | a1a479f7-907b-4ae8-a999-9148cadc9224 via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 7.0 | CVSS 3.1 | High | — | — | openGauss via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: a1a479f7-907b-4ae8-a999-9148cadc9224) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Local/physical vector: focus on endpoint telemetry (EDR) from affected hosts.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Source status changed · Received → Deferred
- SSVC assessment updated
- Affected products removed · 1
- Affected products added · opengauss-server/opengauss-connector-jdbc
- Affected products added · opengauss-server/opengauss-connector-jdbc
- Record published
- CVSS changed · 7.0
- Source status changed · → Received
- Record created in this database
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× References added · Oct 19, 2026 – Oct 19, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 19, 2026 – Oct 19, 2026
References
1 on the record
Elsewhere on this site
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-111440 is "JDBC LogFactory 任意类加载/构造导致潜在 RCE", rated High. It affects openGauss-connector-jdbc (openGauss-server); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.0 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.22% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.