CVE Intelligence
High Injection

CVE-2026-112942 — launch-editor: `fs.existsSync()` existence check can be bypassed on Windows

launch-editor allows users to open files with line numbers in editor from Node.js. Prior to 2.14.2, launch-editor-middleware processes an attacker-controlled Windows file argument where the file argument ends in a parent-directory component plus a line-and-column suffix: the path is resolved while the suffix is still present, and launch-editor removes the suffix before its existsSync check, leaving the existing parent directory for existsSync and allowing the attacker-controlled file argument to pass filename existence validation without requiring the malicious filename to exist. The bypass can lead to OS command injection when combined with the separately described Windows percent-expansion flaw. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.2.

Published Oct 20, 2026 · Updated Oct 20, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: GitHub_M

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • Technical severity (high)+6

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
—
No EPSS score.
Affects
Vitejs
Launch-editor and 2 more
CVSS base
7.5
High · 2 source(s)

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Vitejs Launch-editor, Vitejs Vite, Vitejs Vite-plus).
  2. The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
  3. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  4. Exploitation requires user interaction: tighten email/web filtering and warn affected users.
  5. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (injection), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Vitejs Launch-editor version < 2.14.2 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Vitejs Vite version >= 8.3.0, < 8.3.3version >= 8.2.0, < 8.2.4version >= 8.0.0, < 8.1.6version >= 7.0.0, < 7.3.7version < 6.4.4 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Vitejs Vite-plus version < 1.1.0 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Active
Scope
X
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent)
None
Integrity (subsequent)
None
Availability (subsequent)
None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
7.5 CVSS 4.0 High — — security-advisories@github.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
7.5 CVSS 4.0 High — — GitHub_M via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X (score shown at the top: security-advisories@github.com)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-77 · Command Injection

Other CVEs with this weakness →

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
  • Look for parameters with command/query metacharacters and unexpected child processes of the service.
web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPSapplication logsendpoint telemetry (EDR)

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Source status changed · Received → Awaiting Analysis
    Oct 20, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Affected products added · vitejs/launch-editor, vitejs/vite, vitejs/vite-plus
    Oct 20, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 20, 2026
  • CVSS changed · 7.5
    Oct 20, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Received
    Oct 20, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 20, 2026 · Alertas do Telegram
  • CVE published
    Oct 20, 2026 · GitHub_M

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× References added · Oct 20, 2026 – Oct 20, 2026
  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 20, 2026 – Oct 20, 2026

References

3 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Vitejs
every CVE for this vendor
Injection
same class
CWE-77
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • Medium CVE-2026-112946 Vite: Files outside `server.fs.allow` could be served when project paths match system paths on non-Windows machine 14h
  • Low CVE-2026-112945 Vite: Cross origin script execution through Vite custom middleware 14h
  • Medium CVE-2026-112948 Vitest: Servers misapply `server.fs.deny`, serving `.env`, private keys, `.git`, and the API token file 14h
  • Medium CVE-2026-112947 Vite: First 4 bytes of files outside of `server.fs` setting is exposed by `?vite-wasm-instance` 14h
  • Medium CVE-2026-112943 launch-editor: escapeCmdArgs() omits % escaping on Windows 15h
  • Medium CVE-2026-112944 launch-editor: Editor CLI flag misinterpretation causing arbitrary command execution for some editors 15h

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No FIRST EPSS score.
  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No CISA SSVC assessment.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-112942 is "launch-editor: `fs.existsSync()` existence check can be bypassed on Windows", rated High. It affects Launch-editor (Vitejs); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.5 describes technical severity. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.