CVE-2026-113718 — virtualenv: Xonsh activation literals depend on the script decoding codec
virtualenv is a tool for creating isolated virtual python environments. Prior to 21.14.9, POSIX xonsh activation quote() uses repr() to write printable non-ASCII prompt or destination data into UTF-8 activate.xsh, while xonsh can read that script using $XONSH_ENCODING. Under a legacy multibyte codec such as GBK or Big5, a UTF-8 trail byte can consume the backslash before an adjacent quote, allowing the literal to close and attacker-influenced statements to execute when the user sources the generated script. This issue is fixed in version 21.14.9.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+2
- Technical severity (high)+6
- CISA SSVC: exploitation "poc"+5
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
- Pip Virtualenv: fixed in version 21.14.9 — github.com (GitHub Security Advisories)
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Pypa Virtualenv, Pip Virtualenv).
- Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
- Exploitation requires user interaction: tighten email/web filtering and warn affected users.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (injection), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pypa | Virtualenv | version < 21.14.9 | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Pip | Virtualenv | < 21.14.9 | Vulnerable | GitHub Security Advisories |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | CVSS 4.0 | High | — | — | security-advisories@github.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 7.1 | CVSS 4.0 | High | — | — | GitHub_M via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X (score shown at the top: security-advisories@github.com) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 21, 2026 → Oct 30, 2026 · 10 reading(s) · max 0.24%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Local/physical vector: focus on endpoint telemetry (EDR) from affected hosts.
- Look for parameters with command/query metacharacters and unexpected child processes of the service.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Source status changed · Awaiting Analysis → Undergoing Analysis
- Fix documented
- Affected products added · pip/virtualenv
- SSVC assessment updated
- Source status changed · Received → Awaiting Analysis
- Affected products added · pypa/virtualenv
- Record published
- CVSS changed · 7.1
- Source status changed · → Received
- Record created in this database
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× References added · Oct 27, 2026 – Oct 27, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 20, 2026 – Oct 20, 2026
References
6 on the record
- github.com/pypa/virtualenv/commit/e5fc2e6e189a877ff559af288919e3525d13e5e0
- github.com/pypa/virtualenv/releases/tag/21.14.9
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-394h-qwmc-48pf
- github.com/pypa/virtualenv/security/advisories/GHSA-394h-qwmc-48pf
- github.com/pypa/virtualenv/pull/3432
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-113718
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- High CVE-2026-115586 virtualenv: Bash activator leaves the --prompt value unescaped in PS1 when promptvars is off, so prompt expansion later executes it (regression in 21.14.9) 7d
- High CVE-2026-113776 virtualenv activation scripts run code from a path that contains a placeholder name 10d
- High CVE-2026-113732 virtualenv activate.fish runs commands from a path or prompt with a backslash before a quote 10d
- High CVE-2026-113726 virtualenv activate runs commands from the environment name in zsh with PROMPT_SUBST 10d
- Medium CVE-2026-113724 virtualenv: Deletion recovery can change a symlink target's mode 10d
- High CVE-2026-113725 virtualenv bash activate runs commands from an environment name with a backslash before $ 10d
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-113718 is "virtualenv: Xonsh activation literals depend on the script decoding codec", rated High. It affects Virtualenv (Pypa); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.1 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.24% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.