CVE Intelligence
Medium

CVE-2026-116194 — Rclone 1.52.0 before 1.75.2 CSRF via pCloud OAuth Callback

Rclone from 1.52.0 before 1.75.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the pCloud backend's localhost OAuth callback, which disables the state check and trusts the hostname parameter. Malicious web pages can send a stateless request to port 53682 during authorization, planting attacker tokens and API hosts so later transfers reach the attacker.

Published Oct 25, 2026 · Updated Oct 29, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP, GitHub Security Advisories · CNA: VulnCheck

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 0.1% (30-day exploitation probability)+0
  • Technical severity (medium)+3
  • CISA SSVC: exploitation "poc"+5

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
0.12%
ahead of 2% of scored CVEs · Oct 29, 2026
Affects
Rclone
Rclone
CVSS base
6.8
Medium · 3 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
Proof of concept
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Rclone Rclone).
  2. The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
  3. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  4. Exploitation requires user interaction: tighten email/web filtering and warn affected users.
  5. Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Rclone Rclone ≥ 1.52.0 and < 1.75.2 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Rclone Rclone ≥ 1.52.0 and < 1.75.2 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
7.6 CVSS 4.0 High — — disclosure@vulncheck.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
7.6 CVSS 4.0 High — — VulnCheck via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
6.8 CVSS 3.1 Medium 1.6 5.2 disclosure@vulncheck.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
6.8 CVSS 3.1 Medium — — GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories
6.8 CVSS 3.1 Medium — — VulnCheck via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N (score shown at the top: disclosure@vulncheck.com)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-346

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 26, 2026 → Oct 29, 2026 · 4 reading(s) · max 0.12%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPS

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 29, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Source status changed · Analyzed → Modified
    Oct 29, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Affected products added · rclone/rclone
    Oct 27, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · Awaiting Analysis → Analyzed
    Oct 27, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · Received → Awaiting Analysis
    Oct 26, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Affected products added · rclone/rclone
    Oct 25, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 25, 2026
  • CVSS changed · 6.8
    Oct 25, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Received
    Oct 25, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 25, 2026 · Alertas do Telegram
  • CVE published
    Oct 25, 2026 · VulnCheck

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 2× References added · Oct 25, 2026 – Oct 26, 2026
  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 25, 2026 – Oct 25, 2026

References

4 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Rclone
every CVE for this vendor
CWE-346
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • Medium CVE-2026-116196 Rclone before v1.75.2 B2 Credential Leak on Redirect via --b2-download-url 5d
  • High CVE-2026-116189 rclone 1.55.0 before 1.75.2 selfupdate Signature Verification Bypass via SHA256SUMS 5d
  • Low CVE-2026-116190 rclone v1.56.0 before v1.75.2 WebDAV Credential Header Leak on Redirect 5d
  • High CVE-2026-116191 Rclone before 1.75.2 Path Traversal via serve webdav MKCOL 5d
  • Medium CVE-2026-116192 rclone from 1.37 before 1.74.2 SSRF via --rc-serve scheme-relative remote roots 5d
  • Medium CVE-2026-116195 Rclone before 1.75.2 Path Traversal via translateLink .rclonelink Suffix Trim 5d

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-116194 is "Rclone 1.52.0 before 1.75.2 CSRF via pCloud OAuth Callback", rated Medium. It affects Rclone (Rclone); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 6.8 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.12% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.