CVE Intelligence
Critical Injection

CVE-2026-116207 — YesWiki 4.6.0 before 4.7.0 SQL Injection via Bazar Entries Search API

YesWiki 4.6.0 before 4.7.0 and 5.0.0-alpha1 before 5.0.0-alpha4 contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in SearchManager::prepareSearchRequest(). Field names from the query and searchfields parameters of the public Bazar entries search API are placed in a backtick-quoted alias escaped only with mysqli_real_escape_string. Attackers can supply a backtick to inject subqueries, reading data such as user password hashes or exhausting database threads with SLEEP().

Published Oct 25, 2026 · Updated Oct 26, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP, GitHub Security Advisories · CNA: VulnCheck

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 0.3% (30-day exploitation probability)+4
  • Technical severity (critical)+10
  • Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
0.31%
ahead of 23% of scored CVEs · Oct 29, 2026
Affects
Yeswiki
Yeswiki
CVSS base
9.1
Critical · 3 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
Yes
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Yeswiki Yeswiki).
  2. The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
  3. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  4. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (injection), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Yeswiki Yeswiki ≥ 4.6.0 and < 4.7.0≥ 5.0.0-alpha1 and < 5.0.0-alpha4 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
8.8 CVSS 4.0 High — — disclosure@vulncheck.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
8.8 CVSS 4.0 High — — VulnCheck via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
9.1 CVSS 3.1 Critical 3.9 5.2 disclosure@vulncheck.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
9.1 CVSS 3.1 Critical — — GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories
9.1 CVSS 3.1 Critical — — VulnCheck via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H (score shown at the top: disclosure@vulncheck.com)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-89 · SQL Injection

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 26, 2026 → Oct 29, 2026 · 4 reading(s) · max 0.31%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
  • Look for parameters with command/query metacharacters and unexpected child processes of the service.
web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPSapplication logsendpoint telemetry (EDR)

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 26, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Affected products added · yeswiki/yeswiki
    Oct 25, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 25, 2026
  • CVSS changed · 9.1
    Oct 25, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Deferred
    Oct 25, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 25, 2026 · Alertas do Telegram
  • CVE published
    Oct 25, 2026 · VulnCheck

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 2× References added · Oct 25, 2026 – Oct 26, 2026
  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 25, 2026 – Oct 25, 2026

References

5 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Yeswiki
every CVE for this vendor
Injection
same class
CWE-89
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • CVE-2026-116828 YesWiki before 4.7.0 SQL Injection via despam.php INTERVAL operand 3d
  • CVE-2026-116827 YesWiki before 4.7.0 SSRF via copyUrlToLocalFile in Bazar CSV Import 3d
  • CVE-2026-116826 YesWiki before 4.7.0 Authenticated SSRF via Page Duplication API downloadFile 3d
  • CVE-2026-116823 YesWiki before 4.7.0 Reflected XSS via BazarField $_REQUEST Fallback 3d
  • CVE-2026-116825 YesWiki from 4.6.2 before 4.7.0 HTTP Signature Replay via ActivityPub Inbox 3d
  • CVE-2026-116822 YesWiki before 4.7.0 Template Traversal via BazarListeAction template Parameter 3d

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-116207 is "YesWiki 4.6.0 before 4.7.0 SQL Injection via Bazar Entries Search API", rated Critical. It affects Yeswiki (Yeswiki); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 9.1 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.31% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.