CVE Intelligence
Critical Injection

CVE-2026-12850 — GeoVision GV-I/O Box 4E OS Command Injection in libNetSetObj.so

Multiple OS command injection vulnerabilities exist in the libNetSetObj.so functionality of GeoVision GV-I/O Box 4E 2.09. A specially crafted network packet can lead to command execution. An attacker can send a network request to trigger this vulnerability. `libNetSetObj.so` is an internal library used by various binaries on the device to configure the network stack (start and stop various services, configure IP, Netmask, gateway, dns, etc.) #### CNetSetObj::m_F_n_Set_Gate_way command injection The following function takes a string as a gatewy address, performs no sanitization on it and calls `system`. This is a classic command injection vulnerability. The function is reachable from both the network-exposed `DVRSearch` service and the `Network.cgi` endpoint. int __fastcall CNetSetObj::m_F_n_Set_Gate_way(const char **this, char *gw, char *dev) { char s[324]; // [sp+4h] [bp-144h] BYREF if ( !dev && !*this || !gw ) return 0; system("/sbin/route del -net 224.0.0.0 netmask 224.0.0.0"); system("/sbin/route del default "); if ( dev ) sprintf(s, "/sbin/route add default gw %s dev %s", gw, dev); //attacker controlled gw string else sprintf(s, "/sbin/route add default gw %s dev %s", gw, *this); //attacker controlled gw string system(s); sprintf(s, "/sbin/route add -net 224.0.0.0 netmask 224.0.0.0 gw %s dev %s", gw, *this); //attacker controlled gw string system(s); return 1; }

Published Jun 24, 2026 · Updated Oct 13, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: GV

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 2.7% (30-day exploitation probability)+13
  • Technical severity (critical)+10

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
2.7%
ahead of 86% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026
Affects
Geovision
GV-I/O Box 4E
CVSS base
9.1
Critical · 2 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Geovision GV-I/O Box 4E).
  2. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  3. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (injection), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Geovision GV-I/O Box 4E version V2.09 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
9.1 CVSS 3.1 Critical 2.3 6.0 0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9 via NIST National Vulnerability Database
9.1 CVSS 3.1 Critical — — GV via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: 0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-78 · OS Command Injection

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 2.70%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
  • Look for parameters with command/query metacharacters and unexpected child processes of the service.
web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPSapplication logsendpoint telemetry (EDR)

Analysis and videos

CVE-2026-12850: GeoVision GV-I/O Box 4E OS Command Injection in libNetSetObj.so
GeoVision GV-I/O Box 4E 2.09 contains OS command injection flaws in the libNetSetObj.so library, where values received over the network are passed without sanitization into system calls. The record describes a gateway-address handler reachable through the DVRSearch service and the Network.cgi endpoint, and the CNA rates it critical with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.1. No confirmed exploitation appears in the sources consulted, and the record lists no fixed version.

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Affected products added · geovision inc./gv-i/o box 4e
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 13, 2026
  • CVSS changed · 9.1
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Deferred
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVE published
    Jun 24, 2026 · GV

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

2 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Geovision
every CVE for this vendor
Injection
same class
CWE-78
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • Critical CVE-2026-12851 GeoVision GV-I/O Box 4E OS command injection in libNetSetObj.so Jun 24, 2026
  • Critical CVE-2026-12846 GeoVision GV-I/O Box 4E: stack buffer overflow in DVRSearch service Jun 24, 2026
  • Critical CVE-2026-12486 GeoVision GV-I/O Box 4E OS Command Injection in libNetSetObj.so Jun 24, 2026
  • Critical CVE-2026-12849 GeoVision GV-I/O Box 4E OS Command Injection in libNetSetObj.so Jun 24, 2026
  • Critical CVE-2026-12847 GV-I/O Box 4E DVRSearch Stack Buffer Overflow Jun 24, 2026
  • Critical CVE-2026-12848 GV-I/O Box DVRSearch UDP Stack-Based Buffer Overflow (CVE-2026-12848) Jun 24, 2026

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-12850 is "GeoVision GV-I/O Box 4E OS Command Injection in libNetSetObj.so", rated Critical. It affects GV-I/O Box 4E (Geovision); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 9.1 describes technical severity. EPSS 2.70% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.