High exploit reference

CVE-2026-2107 — yeqifu warehouse Log Info LoginfoController.java batchDeleteLoginfo improper authorization

A vulnerability was found in yeqifu warehouse up to aaf29962ba407d22d991781de28796ee7b4670e4. This affects the function loadAllLoginfo/deleteLoginfo/batchDeleteLoginfo of the file dataset\repos\warehouse\src\main\java\com\yeqifu\sys\controller\LoginfoController.java of the component Log Info Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published Feb 7, 2026 · Updated Oct 13, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: VulDB

Low

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.

How the score was calculated

EPSS 0.4% (30-day exploitation probability)+4
Technical severity (high)+6
CISA SSVC: exploitation "poc"+5

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation

Not confirmed

Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.

EPSS FIRST

0.37%

ahead of 29% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026

Affects

Yeqifu

Warehouse

CVSS base

8.8

High · 3 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation

Proof of concept

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

can an attacker script the kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Yeqifu Warehouse).
No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

Vendor	Product	Versions	Status	Source
Yeqifu	Warehouse	≤ 2025-10-06	Vulnerable	NIST National Vulnerability Database
Yeqifu	Warehouse	version aaf29962ba407d22d991781de28796ee7b4670e4	Vulnerable	CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector

Network

Attack complexity

Low

Privileges required

Low

User interaction

None

Scope

Unchanged

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Availability

High

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Score	Version	Severity	Expl.	Impact	Scored by
5.3	CVSS 4.0	Medium	—	—	VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
2.1	CVSS 4.0	Low	—	—	cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
8.8	CVSS 3.1	High	2.8	5.9	nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
6.3	CVSS 3.1	Medium	2.8	3.4	cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
6.3	CVSS 3.1	Medium	—	—	VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
6.3	CVSS 3.0	Medium	—	—	VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
6.5	CVSS 2.0	Medium	8.0	6.4	cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
6.5	CVSS 2.0	Medium	—	—	VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov)

Scoring entities (NIST, CNA, ADP) score independently; each score is shown with its origin. For prioritization we use 8.8 (NVD (NIST)) as a conservative provisional reference — not a definitive official score.

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-266

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.37%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).

web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPS

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

2026
Affected products added · yeqifu/warehouse
Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
SSVC assessment updated
Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Record published
Oct 13, 2026
CVSS changed · 8.8
Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
Source status changed · → Analyzed
Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
Record created in this database
Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
CVE published
Feb 7, 2026 · VulDB

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

6 on the record

github.com/yeqifu/warehouse/issues/59
Exploit, Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory, issue-tracking, NIST National Vulnerability Database
github.com/yeqifu/warehouse/issues/59
Exploit, Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory, exploit, issue-tracking, NIST National Vulnerability Database
vuldb.com/
Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry, third-party-advisory, NIST National Vulnerability Database
github.com/yeqifu/warehouse/
Product, product, NIST National Vulnerability Database
vuldb.com/
Permissions Required, VDB Entry, signature, permissions-required, NIST National Vulnerability Database
vuldb.com/
Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry, vdb-entry, technical-description, NIST National Vulnerability Database

Elsewhere on this site

Yeqifu
every CVE for this vendor

CWE-266
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

Medium CVE-2026-2852 yeqifu warehouse Sales Endpoint SalesController.java deleteSales access control Feb 20, 2026
Medium CVE-2026-2851 yeqifu warehouse Inport Endpoint InportController.java deleteInport access control Feb 20, 2026
Medium CVE-2026-2850 yeqifu warehouse Customer Endpoint CustomerController.java deleteCustomer access control Feb 20, 2026
Medium CVE-2026-2849 yeqifu warehouse Cache Sync CacheController.java syncCache access control Feb 20, 2026
High CVE-2026-2106 yeqifu warehouse Notice Management NoticeController.java batchDeleteNotice improper authorization Feb 7, 2026
High CVE-2026-2105 yeqifu warehouse Department Management DeptController.java deleteDept improper authorization Feb 7, 2026

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-2107 is "yeqifu warehouse Log Info LoginfoController.java batchDeleteLoginfo improper authorization", rated High. It affects Warehouse (Yeqifu); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 8.8 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.37% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.