Medium File handling exploit reference

CVE-2026-2864 — feng_ha_ha/megagao ssm-erp/production_ssm PictureController.java pictureDelete path traversal

A vulnerability has been found in feng_ha_ha/megagao ssm-erp and production_ssm up to 4288d53bd35757b27f2d070057aefb2c07bdd097. This affects the function pictureDelete of the file PictureController.java. Such manipulation of the argument picName leads to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. This product is distributed under two entirely different names. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published Feb 21, 2026 · Updated Oct 13, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: VulDB

Low

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.

How the score was calculated

EPSS 0.5% (30-day exploitation probability)+6
Technical severity (medium)+3
CISA SSVC: exploitation "poc"+5

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation

Not confirmed

Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.

EPSS FIRST

0.47%

ahead of 39% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026

Affects

Feng Ha Ha

Production Ssm and 1 more

CVSS base

5.4

Medium · 2 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation

Proof of concept

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

can an attacker script the kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Feng Ha Ha Production Ssm, Feng Ha Ha Ssm-erp, Megagao Production Ssm…).
No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (file handling), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

Vendor	Product	Versions	Status	Source
Feng Ha Ha	Production Ssm	version 4288d53bd35757b27f2d070057aefb2c07bdd097	Vulnerable	CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Feng Ha Ha	Ssm-erp	version 4288d53bd35757b27f2d070057aefb2c07bdd097	Vulnerable	CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Megagao	Production Ssm	version 4288d53bd35757b27f2d070057aefb2c07bdd097	Vulnerable	CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Megagao	Ssm-erp	version 4288d53bd35757b27f2d070057aefb2c07bdd097	Vulnerable	CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector

Network

Attack complexity

Low

Privileges required

Low

User interaction

None

Scope

Unchanged

Confidentiality

None

Integrity

Low

Availability

Low

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Score	Version	Severity	Expl.	Impact	Scored by
5.3	CVSS 4.0	Medium	—	—	VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
2.1	CVSS 4.0	Low	—	—	cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
5.4	CVSS 3.1	Medium	2.8	2.5	cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
5.4	CVSS 3.1	Medium	—	—	VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
5.4	CVSS 3.0	Medium	—	—	VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
5.5	CVSS 2.0	Medium	8.0	4.9	cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
5.5	CVSS 2.0	Medium	—	—	VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L (score shown at the top: cna@vuldb.com)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-22 · Path Traversal

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.47%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
Monitor file creation in web directories and paths with traversal sequences (../).

web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPSfile integrity (FIM)endpoint telemetry (EDR)

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

2026
Affected products added · feng ha ha/ssm-erp, feng ha ha/production ssm, megagao/ssm-erp, megagao/production ssm
Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
SSVC assessment updated
Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Record published
Oct 13, 2026
CVSS changed · 5.4
Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
Source status changed · → Deferred
Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
Record created in this database
Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
CVE published
Feb 21, 2026 · VulDB

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

5 on the record

vuldb.com/
vdb-entry, technical-description, NIST National Vulnerability Database
vuldb.com/
signature, permissions-required, NIST National Vulnerability Database
vuldb.com/
third-party-advisory, NIST National Vulnerability Database
github.com/megagao/production_ssm/issues/38
issue-tracking, NIST National Vulnerability Database
github.com/megagao/production_ssm/issues/38
exploit, issue-tracking, NIST National Vulnerability Database

Elsewhere on this site

Feng Ha Ha
every CVE for this vendor

File handling
same class

CWE-22
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

Medium CVE-2026-2863 feng_ha_ha/megagao ssm-erp/production_ssm FileServiceImpl.java deleteFile path traversal Feb 21, 2026
Medium CVE-2026-2860 feng_ha_ha/megagao ssm-erp/production_ssm EmployeeController.java improper authorization Feb 21, 2026

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-2864 is "feng_ha_ha/megagao ssm-erp/production_ssm PictureController.java pictureDelete path traversal", rated Medium. It affects Production Ssm (Feng Ha Ha); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 5.4 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.47% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.