CVE Intelligence
Low SSRF

CVE-2026-3189 — feiyuchuixue sz-boot-parent download server-side request forgery

A weakness has been identified in feiyuchuixue sz-boot-parent up to 1.3.2-beta. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /api/admin/common/files/download. Executing a manipulation of the argument url can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is stated that the exploitability is difficult. Upgrading to version 1.3.3-beta is able to resolve this issue. This patch is called aefaabfd7527188bfba3c8c9eee17c316d094802. Upgrading the affected component is advised. The project was informed beforehand and acted very professional: "We have added a URL protocol whitelist validation to the file download interface, allowing only http and https protocols."

Published Feb 25, 2026 · Updated Oct 13, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: VulDB

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 0.4% (30-day exploitation probability)+4
  • CISA SSVC: exploitation "poc"+5

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
0.36%
ahead of 28% of scored CVEs · Oct 14, 2026
Affects
Feiyuchuixue
Sz-boot-parent
CVSS base
3.1
Low · 2 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
Proof of concept
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Feiyuchuixue Sz-boot-parent).
  2. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  3. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (ssrf), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Feiyuchuixue Sz-boot-parent version 1.3.2-beta Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
2.3 CVSS 4.0 Low — — cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
2.3 CVSS 4.0 Low — — VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
3.1 CVSS 3.1 Low 1.6 1.4 cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
3.1 CVSS 3.1 Low — — VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
3.1 CVSS 3.0 Low — — VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
2.1 CVSS 2.0 Low 3.9 2.9 cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
2.1 CVSS 2.0 Low — — VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N (score shown at the top: cna@vuldb.com)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.36%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
  • Monitor outbound requests from the server to internal IPs and cloud metadata endpoints.
web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPSegress traffic

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Affected products added · feiyuchuixue/sz-boot-parent
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 13, 2026
  • CVSS changed · 3.1
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Deferred
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVE published
    Feb 25, 2026 · VulDB

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

7 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Feiyuchuixue
every CVE for this vendor
SSRF
same class
CWE-918
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • Medium CVE-2026-3188 feiyuchuixue sz-boot-parent API templates path traversal Feb 25, 2026
  • Critical CVE-2026-3187 feiyuchuixue sz-boot-parent API Endpoint upload unrestricted upload Feb 25, 2026
  • Medium CVE-2026-3185 feiyuchuixue sz-boot-parent API Endpoint sys-message authorization Feb 25, 2026
  • Medium CVE-2026-3186 feiyuchuixue sz-boot-parent Password Reset password default password Feb 25, 2026

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-3189 is "feiyuchuixue sz-boot-parent download server-side request forgery", rated Low. It affects Sz-boot-parent (Feiyuchuixue); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 3.1 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.36% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.