CVE-2026-33186 — gRPC-Go has an authorization bypass via missing leading slash in :path
gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omitted the mandatory leading slash (e.g., `Service/Method` instead of `/Service/Method`). While the server successfully routed these requests to the correct handler, authorization interceptors (including the official `grpc/authz` package) evaluated the raw, non-canonical path string. Consequently, "deny" rules defined using canonical paths (starting with `/`) failed to match the incoming request, allowing it to bypass the policy if a fallback "allow" rule was present. This affects gRPC-Go servers that use path-based authorization interceptors, such as the official RBAC implementation in `google.golang.org/grpc/authz` or custom interceptors relying on `info.FullMethod` or `grpc.Method(ctx)`; AND that have a security policy contains specific "deny" rules for canonical paths but allows other requests by default (a fallback "allow" rule). The vulnerability is exploitable by an attacker who can send raw HTTP/2 frames with malformed `:path` headers directly to the gRPC server. The fix in version 1.79.3 ensures that any request with a `:path` that does not start with a leading slash is immediately rejected with a `codes.Unimplemented` error, preventing it from reaching authorization interceptors or handlers with a non-canonical path string. While upgrading is the most secure and recommended path, users can mitigate the vulnerability using one of the following methods: Use a validating interceptor (recommended mitigation); infrastructure-level normalization; and/or policy hardening.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 1.6% (30-day exploitation probability)+11
- Technical severity (critical)+10
- Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
- Documented mitigation — github.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Grpc Grpc, Grpc Grpc-go).
- The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
- Apply the documented mitigations until a definitive fix is available.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (access control), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.1 | CVSS 3.1 | Critical | 3.9 | 5.2 | security-advisories@github.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 9.1 | CVSS 3.1 | Critical | 3.9 | 5.2 | 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 9.1 | CVSS 3.1 | Critical | — | — | GitHub_M via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N (score shown at the top: security-advisories@github.com) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 1.63%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
- Audit administrative actions and access to resources outside each user’s normal pattern.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Affected products added · grpc/grpc-go
- SSVC assessment updated
- Record published
- Fix documented
- CVSS changed · 9.1
- Source status changed · → Modified
- Record created in this database
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
References
100 on the record
- github.com/grpc/grpc-go/security/advisories/GHSA-p77j-4mvh-x3m3
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41941
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28964
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20943
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:53763
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24484
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17598
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36796
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25194
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26999
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11916
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29854
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10153
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:54191
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19099
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21696
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42240
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19207
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21769
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12283
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8483
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34097
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17599
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42151
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22485
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:43331
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14775
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22423
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20089
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34794
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:44235
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24853
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21692
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:53728
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36611
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:43692
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:27001
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10175
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10125
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:40792
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10158
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:50843
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22714
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41019
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:43225
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6564
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42049
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23228
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6174
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21697
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:27892
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:56366
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25201
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28893
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25127
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:18068
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:27957
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10130
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:48699
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21932
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22961
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:27712
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19109
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:53773
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22937
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7128
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23235
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12337
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23345
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19108
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6428
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8433
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11070
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22800
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20041
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12279
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10131
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17459
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22465
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25182
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24506
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20035
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19712
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25045
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42051
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34049
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20322
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21704
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17123
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17789
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:40795
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12118
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21931
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:54286
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21710
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8338
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21703
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7110
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9388
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:40030
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- High CVE-2023-44487 HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack Vulnerability KEV Oct 10, 2023
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-33186 is "gRPC-Go has an authorization bypass via missing leading slash in :path", rated Critical. It affects Grpc (Grpc); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 9.1 describes technical severity. EPSS 1.63% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.