Critical Injection

CVE-2026-48322 — ColdFusion | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94)

ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

Published Jul 14, 2026 · Updated Oct 15, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: adobe

Low

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.

How the score was calculated

Technical severity (critical)+10

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation

Not confirmed

Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.

EPSS FIRST

—

No EPSS score.

Affects

Adobe

Coldfusion and 2 more

CVSS base

9.9

Critical · 3 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

can an attacker script the kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Adobe Coldfusion, Adobe ColdFusion 2023, Adobe ColdFusion 2025).
No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (injection), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

Vendor	Product	Versions	Status	Source
Adobe	Coldfusion	version 2025-update10version 2023-update4version 2023-update5version 2023-update6version 2023-update7version 2023-update8version 2023-update9version 2025 and 25 more version 2025-update1version 2023-update3version 2025-update2version 2025-update3version 2025-update4version 2025-update5version 2025-update6version 2025-update7version 2025-update8version 2025-update9version 2023-update21version 2023version 2023-update1version 2023-update10version 2023-update11version 2023-update12version 2023-update13version 2023-update14version 2023-update15version 2023-update16version 2023-update17version 2023-update18version 2023-update19version 2023-update2version 2023-update20	Vulnerable	NIST National Vulnerability Database
Adobe	ColdFusion 2023	≤ 21	Vulnerable	CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Adobe	ColdFusion 2025	≤ 10	Vulnerable	CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector

Network

Attack complexity

Low

Privileges required

Low

User interaction

None

Scope

Changed

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Availability

High

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Score	Version	Severity	Expl.	Impact	Scored by
9.9	CVSS 3.1	Critical	3.1	6.0	psirt@adobe.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
9.9	CVSS 3.1	Critical	3.1	6.0	nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database
9.9	CVSS 3.1	Critical	—	—	adobe via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: psirt@adobe.com)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-94 · Code Injection

Other CVEs with this weakness →

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
Look for parameters with command/query metacharacters and unexpected child processes of the service.

web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPSapplication logsendpoint telemetry (EDR)

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

2026
Affected products added · adobe/coldfusion 2025, adobe/coldfusion 2023
Oct 15, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
SSVC assessment updated
Oct 15, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Record published
Oct 15, 2026
CVSS changed · 9.9
Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
Source status changed · → Analyzed
Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
Record created in this database
Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
CVE published
Jul 14, 2026 · adobe

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026

References

1 on the record

helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-82.html
Vendor Advisory, vendor-advisory, NIST National Vulnerability Database

Elsewhere on this site

Adobe
every CVE for this vendor

Injection
same class

CWE-94
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

Critical CVE-2026-90530 ColdFusion | Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') (CWE-22) 2d
High CVE-2026-75995 ColdFusion | Improper Input Validation (CWE-20) 2d
High CVE-2026-75748 ColdFusion | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918) 2d
Critical CVE-2026-75994 ColdFusion | Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) 2d
High CVE-2026-75996 ColdFusion | Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) 2d
High CVE-2026-76001 ColdFusion | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918) 2d

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No FIRST EPSS score.
No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-48322 is "ColdFusion | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94)", rated Critical. It affects Coldfusion (Adobe); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 9.9 describes technical severity. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.